DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2016.01462

Acta Agronomica Sinica (作物学报) 2016/42:10 PP.1462-1470

Transcription Characteristics of ZmPHYA1 and ZmPHYA2 under Different Light Treatments in Maize

Plant phytochromes are a family of red/far-red light photoreceptors, which have two forms in plant: inactive red light absorbing form (Pr) and active far-red light absorbing form (Pfr). During plant growth and developmental processes, phytochromes play pivotal roles in regulations of seed germination, plant height, flowering time, and shade-avoidance. In the grasses, three subfamilies are present: PHYA, PHYB and PHYC. In maize, an ancient genome duplication has increased the family member to six: PHYA1, PHYA2, PHYB1, PHYB2, PHYC1, and PHYC2. Phytochrome A facilitates the inhibition of hypocotyl elongation, opening of the apical hook, expansion of cotyledons, accumulation of anthocyanin and blocking of greening by continuous FR (FRc) light. In order to evaluate the light response capability and difference of transcription abundance between ZmPHYA1 and ZmPHYA2, we employed quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) assay to investigate the expression patterns of ZmPHYA1 and ZmPHYA2 in the inbred line B73 and Mo17 with different light treatments. The results indicated that both ZmPHYA1 and ZmPHYA2 had a high expression level in leaf and silk, and the transcription abundance of ZmPHYA1 was 2-8 times higher than that of ZmPHYA2. Inbred lines of both B73 and Mo17 possessed longer mesocotyls in dark, far-red and blue light conditions than in red or white light conditions. Both ZmPHYA1 and ZmPHYA2 had a high expression level in far-red and blue lights and rapidly responded to dark-to-far-red and dark-to-blue transitions. ZmPHYA1 was more important under far-red light, so was ZmPHYA2 in blue light. Both of the genes could rapidly respond to transi-tions from dark to red or white light with similar expression pattern. The both genes also respond to long-day or short-day treatments, however the transcription abundance of ZmPHYA1 was 2-5 times higher than that of ZmPHYA2 during the treatments. All the results suggested that the transcription of both ZmPHYA1 and ZmPHYA2 could rapidly responded to different light treatments; ZmPHYA1 might be more effective than ZmPHYA2 in crop improvement. Our results provide a theoretical basis for the function study and evaluation of light response ability for both ZmPHYA1 and ZmPHYA2.

Key words:Maize,Phytochrome,Light signaling transduction,Expression analysis,Light treatment

ReleaseDate:2017-01-12 13:30:44

[1] Fankhauser C, Chory J. Light control of plant development. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol, 1997, 13: 203-229

Zhan K H, Li Z Y, Hou P, Xi Y L, Xiao Y, Meng F H, Yang J P. A new strategy for crop improvement through modification of phy-tochrome signaling pathways. Sci Agric Sin, 2012, 45: 3249-3255 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[2] Deng X W, Quail P H. Signalling in light-controlled development. Semin Cell Dev Biol, 1999, 10: 121-129

[3] Casal J J, Candia A N, Sellaro R. Light perception and signalling by phytochrome A. J Exp Bot, 2014, 65: 2835-2845

[4] Wang H Y, Deng X W. Dissecting the phytochrome A-dependent signaling network in higher plants. Trends Plant Sci, 2003, 8: 172-178

[5] Jiao Y, Lau O, Deng X. Light-regulated transcriptional networks in higher plants. Nat Rev Genet, 2007, 8: 217-230

[6] Li J, Li G, Wang H, Deng X W. Phytochrome Signaling Mecha-nisms. Arabidopsis Book, 2011, 9: e0149

[7] Quail P H. Phytochrome photosensory signalling networks. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2002, 3: 85-93

[8] Bae G, Choi G. Decoding of light signals by plant phytochromes and their interacting proteins. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2008, 59: 281-311

[9] Quail P H. Phytochrome photosensory signalling networks. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2002, 3: 85-93

[10] 詹克慧, 李志勇, 侯佩, 习雨琳, 肖阳, 孟凡华, 杨建平. 利用修饰光敏色素信号途径进行品种改良的可行性. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45: 3249-3255

[11] Boylan M T, Quil P H. Oat phytochrome is biologically active in transgenic tomatoes. Plant Cell, 1989, 1: 765-773

[12] Gyula P, Schäfer E, Nagy F. Light perception and signalling in higher plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2003, 6: 446-452

[13] Quail P H. Photosensory perception and signalling in plant cells: new paradigms? Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2002, 14: 180-188

[14] Sharrock R A, Clack T, Goosey L. Differential activities of the Arabidopsis PHYB/D/E phytochromes in complementing PHYB mutant phenotypes. Plant Mol Biol Rep, 2003, 52: 135-142

[15] Reed J W, Nagatani A, Elich T D, Fagan M, Chory J. Phyto-chrome A and phytochrome B have overlapping but distinct func-tions in Arabidopsis development. Plant Physiol, 1994, 104: 1139-1149

[16] Botto J F, Sanchez R A, Whitelam G C, Casal J J. Phytochrome A mediates the promotion of seed germination by very low fluences of light and canopy shade light in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol, 1996, 110: 439-444

[17] Shinomura T, Nagatani A, Hanzawa H, Kubota M, Watanabe M, Furuya M. Action spectra for phytochrome A- and B-specific photoinduction of seed germination in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1996, 93: 8129-8133

[18] Furuya M. Molecular properties and biogenesis of phytochrome I and II. Adv Biophys, 1989, 25: 133-167

[19] Quail P H. An emerging molecular map of the phytochromes. Plant Cell Environ, 1997, 20: 657-665

[20] Franklin K A, Whitelam G C. Phytochrome a function in red light sensing. Plant Signal Behav, 2007, 2: 383-385

[21] Whitelam G C, Devlin P F. Roles of different phytochromes in Arabidopsis photomorphogenesis. Plant Cell Environ, 1997, 20: 752-758

[22] Casal J J, Luccioni L G, Oliverio K A, Boccalandro H E. Light, phytochrome signalling and photomorphogenesis in Arabidopsis. Photochem Photobiol Sci, 2003, 2: 625-636

[23] Clough R C, Vierstra R D. Phytochrome degradation. Plant Cell Environ, 1997, 20: 713-721

[24] Nagy F, Schäfer E. Phytochromes control photomorphogenesis by differentially regulated, interacting signaling pathways in higher plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 53: 329-355

[25] Sharrock R A, Clack T. Patterns of expression and normalized levels of the five Arabidopsis phytochromes. Plant Physiol, 2002, 130: 442-456

[26] Johnson E, Bradley M, Harberd N P, Whitelam G C. Photore-sponses of light-grown phyA mutants of Arabidopsis (phyto-chrome A is required for the perception of daylength extensions). Plant Physiol, 1994, 105: 141-149

[27] Yanovsky M J, Kay S A. Molecular basis of seasonal time measurement in Arabidopsis. Nature, 2002, 419: 308-312

[28] Yanovsky M J, Casal J J, Whitelam G C. Phytochrome A, phyto-chrome B and HY4 are involved in hypocotyl growth responses to natural radiation in Arabidopsis: weak de-etiolation of the phyA mutant under dense canopies. Plant Cell Environ, 1995, 18: 788-794

[29] Casal J J. Phytochrome A enhances the promotion of hypocotyl growth caused by reductions in levels of phytochrome B in its far-red-light-absorbing form in light-grown Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol, 1996, 112: 965-973

[30] Yanovsky M J, Alconada-Magliano T M, Mazzella M A, Gatz C, Thomas B, Casal J J. Phytochrome A affects stem growth, anthocyanin synthesis, sucrose-phosphate-synthase activity and neighbour detection in sunlight-grown potato. Planta, 1998, 205: 235-241

[31] Takano M, Inagaki N, Xie X, Yuzurihara N, Hihara F, Ishizuka T, Yano M, Nishimura M, Miyao A, Hirochika H, Shinomura T. Distinct and cooperative functions of phytochromes A, B, and C in the control of deetiolation and flowering in rice. Plant Cell, 2005, 17: 3311-3325

[32] Garg A K, Sawers R J H, Wang H, Kim J K, Walker J M, Brutnell T P, Wu R J. Light-regulated overexpression of an Arabidopsis phytochrome A gene in rice alters plant architecture and increases grain yield. Planta, 2006, 223: 627-636

[33] Thiele A, Herold M, Lenk I, Quail P H, Gatz C. Heterologous expression of Arabidopsis phytochrome B in transgenic potato influences photosynthetic performance and tuber development. Plant Physiol, 1999, 120: 73-82

[34] Heyer A G, Mozley D, Landschutze V, Thomas B, Gatz C. Func-tion of phytochrome A in potato plants as revealed through the study of transgenic plants. Plant Physiol, 1995, 109: 53-61

[35] Boccalandro H E, Ploschuk E L, Yanovsky M J, Sánchez R A, Gatz C, Casal J J. Increased phytochrome B alleviates density effects on tuber yield of field potato crops. Plant Physiol, 2003, 133: 1539-1546

[36] Robson P R, McCormac A C, Irvine A S, Smith H. Genetic engi-neering of harvest index in tobacco through overexpression of a phytochrome gene. Nat Biotechnol, 1996, 14: 995-998

[37] Chen A, Li C X, Hu W, Lau M Y, Lin H Q, Rockwell N C, Martin S S, Jernstedt J A, Lagarias J C, Dubcovsky J, Lagarias J C. PHYTOCHROME C plays a major role in the acceleration of wheat flowering under long-day photoperiod. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2014, 111: 10037-10044

[38] Mathews S, Sharrock R A. The phytochrome gene family in grasses (Poaceae): a phylogeny and evidence that grasses have a subset of the loci found in dicot angiosperms. Mol Biol Evol, 1996, 13: 1141-1150

[39] Mathews S, Sharrock R A. Phytochrome gene diversity. Plant Cell Environ, 1997, 20: 666-671

[40] Liu X B, Zhang X Y, Wang Y X, Sui Y Y, Zhang S L, Herbert S J, Ding G. Soil degradation: a problem threatening the sustainable development of agriculture in Northeast China. Plant Soil Envi-ron, 2010, 56: 87-97

[41] Gao Y, Jiang W, Dai Y, Xiao N, Zhang C, Li H, Lu Y, Wu M, Tao X, Deng D, Chen J. A maize phytochrome interacting factor 3 improves drought and salt stress tolerance in rice. Plant Mol Biol, 2015, 87: 413-428

[42] Rajeevan M S, Ranamukhaarachi D G, Vernon S D, Unger E R. Use of real-time quantitative PCR to validate the results of cDNA array and differential display PCR technologies. Methods, 2001, 25: 443-451

[43] Sheehan M J, Farmer P R, Brutnell T P. Structure and expression of maize phytochrome family homeologs. Genetics, 2004, 167: 1395-1405

[44] Markelz N H, Costich D E, Brutnell T P. Photomorphogenic responses in maize seedling development. Plant Physiol, 2004, 133: 1578-1591

[45] Basu D, Dehesh K, Schneider-Poetsch H J, Harrington S E, McCouch S R, Quail P H. Rice PHYC gene: structure, expression, map position and evolution. Plant Mol Biol, 2000, 44: 27-42

[46] Childs K L, Miller F R, Cordonnier-Pratt M M, Pratt L H, Mor-gan P W, Mullet J E. The sorghum photoperiod sensitivity gene, Ma3, encodes a phytochrome B. Plant Physiol, 1997, 113: 611-619

[47] Gaut B S. Patterns of chromosomal duplication in maize and their implications for comparative maps of the grasses. Genome Res, 2001, 11: 55-66

[48] Gaut B S, Doebley J F. DNA sequence evidence for the segmen-tal allotetraploid origin of maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1997, 94: 6809-6814

[49] Wilson W A, Harrington S E, Woodman W L, Lee M, Sorrells M E, McCouch S R. Inferences on the genome structure of progeni-tor maize through comparative analysis of rice, maize and the domesticated panicoids. Genetics, 1999, 153: 453-473

[50] Sheehan M J, Kennedy L M, Costich D E, Lee M, Sorrells M E, McCouch S R. Subfunctionalization of PhyB1 and PhyB2 in the control of seedling and mature plant traits in maize. Plant J, 2007, 49: 338-353

[51] Boylan M T, Quail P H. Oat phytochrome is biologically active in transgenic tomatoes. Plant Cell, 1989, 1: 765-773

[52] Nagatani A, Kay S A, Deak M, Chua N H, Furuya M. Rice type I phytochrome regulates hypocotyl elongation in transgenic to-bacco seedlings. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1991, 88: 5207-5211

[53] Takano M, Kanegae H, Shinomura T, Miyao A, Hirochika H, Fu-ruya, M. Isolation and characterization of rice phytochrome A mutants. Plant Cell, 2001, 13: 521-534

[54] Sawers R J H, Linley P J, Farmer P R, Hanley N P, Costich D E, Terry M J, Brutnell T P. Elongated mesocotyl1, a phytochrome- deficient mutant of maize. Plant Physiol, 2002, 130: 155-163

[55] Halliday K J, Salter M G, Thingnaes E, Whitelam G C. Phyto-chrome control of flowering is temperature sensitive and corre-lates with expression of the floral integrator FT. Plant J, 2003, 33: 875-885

[56] Asami O, Hironori I, Kyoko I K, Takano M, Izawa T. Mo-lecular dissection of the roles of phytochrome in photoperiodic flowering in rice. Plant Physiol, 2011, 157: 1128-1137