doi:

DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2008.00474

Acta Psychologica Sinica (心理学报) 2008/40:4 PP.474-486

The Relationship between Sex-role and Subjective Well-being in China


Abstract:
Since the development of the Bem Sex Role Inventory (BSRI) in 1974, numerous studies have been devoted to sex role. Among these studies, the relation of sex-role to psychological well-being has received the most attention. To date, three theories regarding the utility of sex-roles have been proposed: the congruency model, the androgyny model, and the masculinity model. The congruency model posits that masculinity facilitates male's mental health but not female's while femininity facilitates female's well-being but not male's. Androgyny model states that people with high levels of both masculinity and femininity enjoy the highest level of well-being independent of their gender. Masculinity model holds that masculinity is the dominant factor that promotes one's psychological well-being. Since most related studies have been done in individualistic cultures, the present study aims to test the generality of the findings in a collectivistic culture, China, by examining the relation of sex-role to subjective well-being. Sex-role was measured by a Chinese version of the BSRI(for masculine subscale, α=0.86; for feminine subscale, α=0.82); Subjective Well-Being was measured by scale developed by Diener and his colleagues (1985)(for the Satisfaction with Life Scale(SWLS), α=0.85; for the Positive Affections and Negative Affections Scale(PANAS), α=0.85). Both scales were rated on a 7-point likert scale. A total of 1242 college students completed the above mentioned two scales online among which 394 were male and 848 were female. The age of the sample ranged from 17 to 25 with a mean of 20.88 (SD=1.46). Chinese college students scored higher on feminine scale than on masculine scale, confirming the collectivistic characteristics of Chinese culture. Two hierarchical regression analyses were conducted with sex, masculinity and femininity as predictors and SWL and PANAS as criteria, respectively. Results demonstrated that the main effects of sex, masculinity and femininity were significant, but none of the interactions were significant. This suggests that the addictive androgyny model is most appropriate in explaining the relation of sex-role to subjective well-being in Chinese culture. Currently, the traditional congruency model is not applicable to neither Western nor Eastern cultures. However, a masculine sex role is ideal in western world while androgyny is ideal in China, suggesting differences exist across cultures in ideal sex-role type. The study also suggests that findings of sex role related research based on a western sample should not be assumed to generalize to other cultures without further examination.

Key words:sex role, masculine, feminine, androgyny, China.

ReleaseDate:2014-07-21 14:19:45



1 Masuda T, Nisbett R E. Attending holistically versus analytically: Comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001, 81: 922~934

2 Ji L, Zhang Z, Nisbett R E. Is it culture or is it language? Examination of language effects in cross-cultural research on categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2004, 87: 57~65

3 Peng K, Nisbett R E. Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. American Psychologist, 1999, 54: 741~754

4 Menon T, Morris M W, Chiu C, Hong Y. Culture and the construal of agency: Attribution to individual versus group dispositions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1999, 76: 701~717

5 Heine S J, Lehman D R, Markus H R, Kitayama S. Is there a universal need for positive self-regard? Psychological Review, 1999, 106: 766~794

6 Lee A Y, Aaker J L, Gardner W L. The pleasure and pains of distinct self-construals: The role of interdependence in regulatory focus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2000, 78: 1122~1134

7 Ji L, Nisbett R E, Su Y. Culture, change, and prediction. Psychological Science, 2000, 12: 450~456

8 Iyengar S S, Lepper M R. Rethinking the value of choice: A cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1999, 76: 349~366

9 Cohen D, Gunz A. As seen by the other : Perspectives on the self in the memories and emotional perceptions of Easterners and Westerners. Psychological Science, 2002, 13: 55~59

10 Oishi S, Wyer R S, Colcombe S J. Cultural variation in the use of current life satisfaction to predict the future. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2000, 78: 434~445

11 Suh E M, Diener E, Oishi S, Triandis H C. The shifting basis of life satisfaction judgments across cultures: Emotions versus norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, 74: 482~493

12 Fiske A P, Kitayama S, Markus H R Nisbett R E. The cultural matrix of social psychology. In: D T Gilbert, S T Fiske, Lindzey G (Eds.). The Handbook of Social Psychology. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1995. 868~981

13 Lehman D, Chiu C, Schaller M. Culture and psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 2004, 55: 689~714

14 Bern S L. The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974, 42: 155~162

15 Bern S L. Probing the promise of androgyny. In: A G Kaplan, J P Bean (Eds.), Beyond sex-role stereotypes: Readings toward a psychology of androgyny. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976

16 Cook E P. Psychological Androgyny. Pergamon Press Inc, 1985. 70~125

17 Whitley B E. Sex role orientation and self-esteem: A critical meta-analytic review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983, 44: 765~778

18 Whitley B E. Sex role orientation and psychological. well-being: Two meta-analyses. Sex Roles, 1984, 12: 207~225

19 Lubinski D, Tellegen A, Butcher J N. Masculinity, femininity and androgyny viewed and assessed as distinct concepts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983, 44: 428~439

20 Taylor M C, Hall J A. Psychological androgyny: A review and reformulation of theories, methods and conclusions. Psychological Bulletin, 1982, 92: 347~366

21 Bassoff E S, Glass G V. The relation between sex roles and mental health: A meta-analysis of twenty-six studies. Counseling Psychologist, 1982, 10: 105~110

22 Dimitrovsky L, Singer J, Yinon Y. Masculine and feminine traits: Their relation to suitedness for and success in training for traditionally masculine and feminine army functions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989, 57: 839~847

23 Mischel W. Sex-typing and socialization. In: P E Mussen (Ed.) Carmichael's Manual of Child Psychology. Vol. 2. Wiley, New York, 1970 

24 Oyserman D, Coon H M, Kemmelmeier M. Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 2002, 128: 3~72

25 Markus H, Kitayama S. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 1991, 98: 224~253

26 Diener E, Diener M. Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1995, 68: 653~663

27 Kwan V S Y, Bond M H, Singelis T M. Pancultural explanations for life satisfaction: Adding relationship harmony to self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1997, 73: 1038~1051

28 Oishi S, Diener E. Goals, culture, and subjective well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2001, 27: 1674~1682

29 Oishi S, Wyer R S Jr, Colcombe S J. Cultural variation in the use of current life satisfaction to predict the future. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2000, 78: 434~445

30 Schimmack U, Radhakrishnan P, Oishi S, Dzokoto V. Culture, personality, and subjective well-being: Integrating process models of life satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2002, 82: 582~593

31 Suh E M. Culture, identity consistency, and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2002, 83: 1378~1391

32 Suh E M, Diener E, Oishi S, Triandis H C. The shifting basis of life satisfaction judgments across cultures: Emotions versus norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, 74: 482~493

33 Elegant S. China's me generation. Times, 2007, July 26

34 Shi Y L. Review on sex role types and related factors in college students (in Chinese). Journal of Shandong Science Engineering University: Social Science Division, 2005, 21(5): 97~100(石艳玲. 大学生性别角色类型及相关因素研究综述. 山东理工大学学报: 社会科学版,2005,21(5): 97~100)

35 Song L L. Review on androgyny research in college students. Journal of Northeast Financial University, 2006, (3): 87~88(宋丽丽. 大学生性别角色双性化研究综述. 东北财经大学学报,2006,(3): 87~88)

36 Qian M Y, Zhang G J, Luo S H, Zhang X. Sex Role Inventory for college students (CSRI) (in Chinese). Chinese Journal of Psychology. 2000, 32 (1): 99~104(钱铭怡,张光健,罗珊红,张莘. 大学生性别角色量表(CSRI)的编制. 心理学报, 2000,32 (1): 99~104)

37 Lu Q, Su Y J. Revision of Bem Sex Role Inventory (in Chinese). Chinese Journal of Mental Health, 2003, 17(8): 550~553(卢勤,苏彦捷. 对Bem 性别角色量表的考察与修订. 中国心理卫生杂志,2003,17(8): 550~553)

38 Cui H, Wang D F. Construction of Sex Role Adjective Scale for Chinese (in Chinese). Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medical Science, 2005, 14 (10): 948~951(崔红,王登峰. 中国人性别角色形容词评定量表的建构. 中国行为医学科学,2005,14 (10): 948~951)

39 Cai H J, Yang Z L. Using IAT to study the structure of gender self-concept (in Chinese). Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2002, 34(2): 168~174(蔡华俭,杨治良. 大学生性别自我概念的结构. 心理学报,2002, 34(2): 168~174)

40 Ren B X, Zhang X F. Distribution of university students’ gender traits (in Chinese). Chinese Journal of School Health, 2006, 27(2): 147~148(任伯绪,张晓方. 大学生性别特质分布特点研究. 中国学校卫生,2006,27(2): 147~148)

41 Yang L, Wang X X. Relationship between university students’ sex role and psychological health (in Chinese). Higher Education of Sciences, 2005, 05: 23~28(杨玲,王雄雄. 大学生性别角色与心理健康水平关系的研究. 高等理科教育,2005,05: 23~28)

42 Lu S D, Yuan L X. The relationship between sex role and mental health (in Chinese). China Journal of Health Psychology, 2002, 10 (6): 470~471(卢声达,袁立新. 性别角色与心理健康的相关研究. 健康心理学杂志, 2002,10 (6): 470~471)

43 Cui H, Wang D F. Research on relationship between sex stereotypes and psychosocial adjustment for Chinese subjects (in Chinese). Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2005, 13(4): 411~413(崔红,王登峰. 性别角色类型与心理社会适应的关系研究. 中国临床心理学杂志,2005,13(4): 411~413)

44 Du J. The influence of androgyny to university student’s subjective well-being (in Chinese). Science of Social Psychology, 2007, Z1: 131~135(杜军. 双性化对大学生主观幸福感的影响. 社会心理科学,2007,Z1: 131~135)

45 Wang Z H, Zhang J X. Impacts of sex, sex role and gender belief on undergraduates’ personality traits (in Chinese). Psychological Development and Education, 2007, 23(3): 50~55(王中会,张建新. 性别、性别角色和性别观念对大学生人格特征的影响. 心理发展与教育,2007,23(3): 50~55) 

46 Zhai X J. Correlation between sex role types and personality of college students (in Chinese). Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative, 2006, 10(30): 45~47(翟秀军. 大学生性别特质类型与人格特征的相关性. 中国临床康复,2006,10(30): 45~47)

47 Li S M. Research on relationship between androgyny and personality of college students (in Chinese). Journal of Shanxi Normal University: Philosophy and Social Science Division, 1998, 27(4): 148~152(李少梅. 大学生双性化性别特质与人格特征的相关研究. 陕西师范大学学报:哲学社会科学版,1998,27(4): 148~152)

48 Liu Y M. Androgyny and interpersonal relations of university students (in Chinese). Journal of Ningbo Radio TV University, 2006, 4(1): 64~66(刘玉梅. 大学生的双性化人格与人际交往. 宁波广播电视大学学报,2006,4(1): 64~66)

49 Wang H R. Relationship between androgyny and emotional state of college students (in Chinese). Journal of Shandong Youth Administrative Cadres’ College, 2005, 01: 49~50(王红瑞. 大学生双性化人格特质与情绪状态的相关研究. 山东省青年管理干部学院学报,2005,01: 49~50)

50 Yu X F, Deng X N, Wang L H. Relationship between sex role, anxiety and depression (in Chinese). Chinese Journal of School Health, 2004, 25(1): 39~40(余小芳,邓小农,王立皓. 性别角色与焦虑及抑郁的相关研究. 中国学校卫生,2004,25(1): 39~40)

51 Xu Y, Ji L Q, Zhang W X. Urban fathers’ involvement in children-parenting and its relationship with gender roles (in Chinese). Psychological Development and Education, 2006, 03: 35~40(许岩,纪林芹,张文新. 城市父亲参与儿童教养的特点及其与性别角色的关系. 心理发展与教育,2006,03: 35~40)

52 Li S G, Zheng Y. A research on effects of parental rearing styles on children’s dual-gender role development (in Chinese). Journal of Shijiazhuang University, 2006, 8(3): 99~102(李曙光,郑艳. 父母教养方式对儿童性别双性化发展影响的研究. 石家庄学院学报,2006,8(3): 99~102)

53 Cohen J. The cost of dichotomization. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1983, 7: 249~253

54 Aiken L S, West S G. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1991

55 McClelland G H, Judd C M. Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin, 1993, 114: 376~390

56 Stone-Romero E F, Anderson L E. Relative power of moderated multiple regression and the comparison of subgroup correlation coefficients for detecting moderating effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1994, 79: 354~459

57 Gosling S D, Vazire S, Srivastava S, Oliver J. Should we trust beb-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires. American Psychologist, 2004, 59(2): 93~104 

58 Cai H J, Lin Y J, Wu Q P, et al. Examining the measurement invariance between paper-and-pencil and internet-administered test: Take life-satisfaction scale for example (in Chinese). Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2008, 40(2): 228~239(蔡华俭,林永佳,伍秋萍,严乐,黄玄凤. 网络测验和纸笔测验的测量不变性研究:以生活满意度量表为例. 心理学报,2008,40(2): 228~239)

59 Nosek B A, Banaji M, Greenwald A G. Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site. Group Dynamics, 2002, 6: 101~115

60 Srivastava S, John O P, Gosling S D. Development of personality in early and middle adulthood: Set like plaster or persistent change? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2003, 84(5): 1041~1053

61 Robins R W, Trzesniewski K H, Tracy J L, Gosling S D, Potter J. Global self-esteem across the lifespan. Psychology and Aging, 2002, 17: 423~434

62 Diener E, Emmons R A, Larsen R J, et al. The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1985, 49: 71~75

63 Pavot W, Diener E. Review of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Psychological Assessment, 1993, 5: 164~172

64 Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, 1988

65 He Y H, Peng S Q, Zhao Z Y. An exploration of Chinese psychology (in Chinese). Beijing: Beijing University Press, 2006. 146~158(何友晖, 彭泗清, 赵志裕. 世道人心:对中国人心理的探索. 北京大学出版社,2006. 146~158)

66 Cai H, Brown J D, Deng C, Oakes M. Self-esteem and culture: Differences in cognitive self-evaluations or affective self-regard? Journal of Asian Social Psychology, 2007, 10:162~170 

67 Tafarodi R W, Swann W B. Self-liking and self-competence as dimensions of global self-esteem: Initial validation of a measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1995, 65: 322~342

68 West S G, Aiken L A, Krull J L. Experimental personality designs: Analyzing categorical by continuous variable interactions. Journal of Personality, 1996, 64: 1~68

69 Hu Y, Tang R X, Zhang L F. A Review of research on androgyny in last ten years: Idea from Li Yuchun's neutral beauty (in Chinese). Entrepreneur World: Theory Division, 2006, 04: 153~154(胡燕,唐日新,张丽芳. 近十年来的双性化人格研究综述——由李宇春中性之美想到的. 企业家天地:理论版,2006,04: 153~154)

70 Cheng C. Processes underlying gender-role flexibility: Do androgynous individuals know more or know how to cope? Journal of Personality, 2005, 73: 645~674

71 Xu W D, Wu M Z, Qiu F D. A research on the relationship between self-esteem and subjective well-being (in Chinese). Psychological Science, 2005, 28 (3): 562 ~ 565(徐维东,吴明证,邱扶东. 自尊与主观幸福感关系研究. 心理科学,2005,28 (3) :562 ~ 565)

72 Wang F, Chen F G. The factors influencing subjective well-being (in Chinese). Chinese Journal of Behavioral and Medical Science, 2005, 14(6) : 575~576(王芳,陈福国. 主观幸福感的影响因素. 中国行为医学科学,2005,14 (6): 575~576)

73 Marsh H W, Byrne B M. Differentiated additive androgyny model: Relations between masculinity, femininity, and multiple dimensions of self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1991, 61: 811~828

PDF