doi:

DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2011.00021

Acta Psychologica Sinica (心理学报) 2011/43:1 PP.21-29

Women’s Cue Preferences and Information Processing Mode in Mate Choice


Abstract:
Among the wide range of theoretical and empirical findings on mate choice, the focus of much research has been on two important questions: What mate choice preferences do people have, and what is the information processing mode used in mate choice (Shackelford, Schmitt & Buss, 2005; Regan, Levin, Sprecher, Christopher, & Cate, 2000). However, most studies of these questions have been based on methods using personal advertisements, questionnaires, and interviews. Few researchers have used experiments methods to explore the preferences and information processing mode used in mate choice. In this study, the information board technology was used to explore Chinese women’s cue preferences and information processing mode when they made mate choices under high or low time pressure, and with more or fewer candidates. The subjects were 68 young Chinese women from 20 to 33 years old. The selected eight cues appeared in the information board columns, and four or eight candidates appeared in the information board rows. This study used a 2×2 [low time pressure (60s)/ high time pressure (20s)]×[more candidates(8)/fewer candidates(4)] within-subject design. The recorded dependent variables were as follows: (1) the mean hit rate of each cue; (2) the mean processing time of each cue; (3) the mean decision time of finishing each information board; (4) depth of search, DS = the number of the opened cells / the total number of cells; (5) pattern of search, PS = (within options – within cues) / (within options + within cues), where “within options” refers to the number of movements from one cue to another in the same option, and “within cues” refers to the number of movements from one option to another on the same cue, and PS > 0 means that the decision-maker adopted a sophisticated search strategy based on options, while PS < 0 means that the decision-maker adopted a heuristic search strategy based on cues (Rieskamp & Hoffrage, 1999). In addition, subjects’ subjective rating of the importance of each cue and their satisfaction with the choices were recorded. The results of the experiments showed that: (1) The candidate's personality, state of health, and sense of responsibility were the top three cues that Chinese women consider; (2) Attribute preferences which were indirectly shown in completing the information board task were not equivalent to attribute preferences which were given directly in the subjective evaluation; (3) Mate choice used a heuristic searching process based on bounded rationality, and the number of candidates and time pressure affected individuals’ mode of information processing of mate cues; (4) There was not a simple linear relationship between the number of candidate and mate choice satisfaction—the increase in the number of candidates did not increase “satisfaction” of the mate choice. These results concur with the hypothesis that human rationality is bounded (Simon, 1956; Kahneman, Slovic, & Tversky, 1982; Gigerenzer, Todd, & the ABC Research Group, 1999) and suggest that sophisticated decision tasks combined with little decision time will force people to use simpler information processing strategies (Payne, Bettman, & Johnson, 1993; Billings & Marcus, 1983; Timmermans, 1993). In some situations, the simpler rules can lead to better results (Goldstein & Gigerenzer, 1999).

Key words:women,mate choice decision,information board,cue preference,information processing mode

ReleaseDate:2014-07-21 16:09:19



Bateson, M., & Healy, S. D. (2005). Comparative evaluation and its implications for mate choice. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 12, 659–664.

Buss, D. M. (2003). The evolution of desire (rev. ed.). New York: Basic Books.

Buss, D. M., Abbott, M., Angleitner, A., Asherian, A., Biaggio, A., Blanco-Villasenor, A., et al. (1990). International preferences in selecting mates. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21, 5–47.

Buss, D. M., Shackelford, T. K., Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Larsen, R. J. (2001). A half century of American mate preferences: The cultural evolution of values. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63, 491–503.

Buston, P. M., & Emlen, S. T. (2003). Cognitive processes underlying human mate choice: The relationship between self-perception and mate preference in western society. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 15, 8805–8810.

Buunk, B. P., Dijkstra, P., Fetchenhauea, D., & Kenrick, D. T. (2002). Age and gender differences in mate selection criteria for various involvement levels. Personal Relationships, 9, 271–278.

Candolin, U. (2003). The use of multiple cues in mate choice. Biological Review, 78, 575–595.

Castellano, S. (2009a). Unreliable preferences, reliable choice, and sexual selection in leks. Animal Behavior, 77, 1225–1232.

Castellano, S. (2009b). Towards an information-processing theory of mate choice. Animal Behavior, 78, 1493–1497.

Dijksterhuis, A. (2004). Think different: The merits of unconscious thought in preference development and decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 586–598.

Edland, A., & Svenson, O. (1993). Judgment and decision making under time pressure: Studies and findings. In Svenson, O. & Maule, A. J. (Eds.), Time Pressure and Stress in Human Judgment and Decision Making (pp. 27–38). New York: Plenum.

Fletcher, G. J. O., Simpson, J. A., Thomas, G., & Giles, L. (1999). Ideals in romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 72–89.

Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M. & the ABC Research Group. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press.

Goldstein, D. G., & Gigerenzer, G. (1999). The recognition heuristics: How ignorance makes us smart. In G. Gigerenzer, P. M. Todd & the ABC group. Simple heuristics that make us smart (pp. 37–58). New York: Oxford University Press.

Han, R. W. (2002). Study of the difference of criterions between female and male in choosing spouse (in Chinese). Northwest Population, 1, 42–44. [韩荣炜. (2002). 两性择偶标准的差异研究. 西北人口, 1, 42–44]

Harrison, G. W., & McCabe, K. A. (1996). Stability and preference distortion in resource matching: An experimental study of the marriage problem. In R. M. Isaac (Ed.), Research in experimental economics (Vol.8).Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Harte, J. M., Westenberg, M. R. M., Someren, M. W. (1994). Process models of decision making. Acta Psychologica, 87, 95–120.

Hey, J. D. (1982). Search for rules for search. Journal of Economics Behavior and Organization, 3, 65–81.

Hey, J. D. (1987). Still searching. Journal of Economics Behavior and Organization, 8, 137–144.

Jankowiak, W. R. (1995). Romantic passion: A universal experience? Columbia University Press, New York.

Jankowiak, W. R., & Fischer, E. F. (1992). A cross-cultural perspective on romantic love. Ethnology, 31, 149–155.

Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kenrick, D. T., Groth, G. E., Trost, M. R., & Sadalla, E. K. (1993). Integrating evolutionary and social exchange perspectives on relationships: Effects of gender, self appraisal and involvement level on mate selection criteria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 951–969.

Kerstholt, J. H. (1994). The effect of time pressure on decision making behavior in a dynamic task environment. Acta Psychologica, 86, 89–104.

Liu, Y. F., & Ma, M. N. (2009). A research on the consistency of implicit attitudes with explicit attitudes and its prediction of consumer behavior (in Chinese). Psychological Science, 32, 563–567. [刘永芳, 马明娜. (2009). 内隐和外显态度预测消费者行为的一致性研究. 心理科学, 32, 563–567]

Martin, A., & Moon, P. (1992). Purchasing decisions, partial knowledge, and economic search: Experimental and simulation evidence. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 4, 253–266.

Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge University Press.

Qian, M. Y., Wang, Y. P., Zhang, X. Y., & Zhu, S. (2003). Changes of mate selection of Chinese women in the last 15 years (in Chinese). Journal of Peking University, 5, 121–128. [钱铭怡, 王易平, 章晓云, 朱松. (2003). 十五年来中国女性择偶标准的变化. 北京大学学报, 5, 121–128]

Regan, P. C., Levin, L., Sprecher, S., Christopher, F. S., & Cate, R. (2000). Partner preferences: What characteristics do men and women desire in their short-term sexual and long-term romantic partners? Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 12, 1–20.

Rieskamp, J., & Hoffrage, U. (1999). When do people use simple heuristics and how can we tell. In G. Gigerenzer, P. M. Todd, & the ABC Research Group (eds.), Simple heuristics that make us smart (pp. 141–167).New York: Oxford University Press.

Shackelford, K. T., Schmitt, P. D., & Buss, D. M. (2005). Universal dimensions of human mate preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 447–458.

Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of environments. Psychological Review, 63, 129–123.

Svenson, O. (1996). Decision making and the search for fundamental psychological regularities: What can be learned from a process perspective? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 252–267.

Timmermans, D. (1993). The impact of task complexity on information use in multi-attribute decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 6, 95–111.

Todd, P. M., & Miller, G. F. (1999). From pride and prejudice to persuasion: Satisficing in mate search. In G. Gigerenzer, P. M. Todd and the ABC Research Group, Simple Heuristics that make us smart (pp. 287–308). New York: Oxford University Press.

Todd, P. M., Penke, L., Fasolo, B., & Lenton, A. (2007). Different cognitive processes underlie human mate choices and mate preferences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 38, 15011–15016.

Todosijević, B., Ljubinković, S., & Arančić, A. (2003). Mate selection criteria: A trait desirability assessment study of sex differences in Serbia. Evolutionary Psychology, 1, 116–126.

Toro-Morn, M., & Sprecher, S. (2003). A cross-cultural comparison of mate preferences among university students: The United States vs. the People’s Republic of China. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 1, 151–170.

Xu, X. L. (2004). From the changes of the view of mate choice to see the modern standard of mate choice: On the Chinese females’ mate choice of 50 years since the founding of the China (in Chinese). Journal of Wuhan University of Technology (Social Science Edition) ,17, 631–635. [许小玲. (2004). 从择偶观的变迁看择偶标准的时代性——论中国女性建国至今50多年的配偶选择. 武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版), 17, 631–635]

Yue, G. A., Chen, H., Zhang, Y. Y. (2005). Verification of evolutionary hypothesis on human mate selection mechanism in cross-culture context (in Chinese). Acta Psychologica Sinica, 37(4), 561–568. [乐国安, 陈浩, 张彦彦. (2005). 进化心理学择偶心理机制假设的跨文化检验. 心理学报, 37(4), 561–568]

Yue, G. A., Zhang, Y. Y., Chen, H. (2005). Studies and disputes on personal advertisements in the west (in Chinese). Advances in Psychological Science, 13(2), 248–256. [乐国安, 张彦彦, 陈浩. (2005).西方有关择偶启事的研究和论争. 心理科学进展, 13(2), 248–256]

Zhang, L. (2000). Marriage is a springboard (in Chinese)? Society, 7, 14–17. [张亮. (2005).婚姻是一块跳板?社会, 7, 14–17]

PDF