doi:

DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2008.00975

Acta Psychologica Sinica (心理学报) 2008/40:9 PP.975-986

The Effect of Rewards and Punishment on Affective Decision-Making in Children-with Two Subtypes of ADHD


Abstract:
Although most of the theories on attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) assumed that deficit in behavioral inhibition was probably the core problem of ADHD, recent studies implied that ADHD patients have aberrant sensitivity to reinforcement, such as rewards and punishment (Sergeant J et al.2000, 2005; Luman M et al. 2005), or emotional control deficit.This aberrant sensibility hypothesis challenges the traditional view on ADHD.However, whether the patients are aberrant sensitive to rewards or to punishment are not clear.Moreover, some relevant studies indicated that Skin conductance responses could reflect their physical arousal while subject responding to cognitive, emotional and social stimulus (Fishbein D et al.2005).Using two experimental designs, the present study examined the effect of rewards and punishment on affective decision-making on two subtypes of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and normal controls, and recorded their anticipatory Skin conductance recordings (SCRs) as well.Thirty-eight children between 7 and 12 years old with a clinical diagnosis of ADHD (22 of predominantly inattentive, i.e, ADHD-I; and 16 of combined, i.e, ADHD-C) were compared to 38 normal controls who were matched in age, IQ and the year of education in affective decision-making.Two variations of the Iowa Gambling Task (Bechara et al, 2000) were used, which typically involved two sets of cards in computer.On each of 100 trails, children chose from 1of 2 decks of cards, when turned, which displayed happy and sad faces (experiment 1), or red and green star (experiment 2) corresponding to rewards or punishment respectively, that means won (happy face or red star) or lost (sad face or green star) cartoon cards by each choice.Cards in 1 deck offered more rewards per trail, but were disadvantageous across trails due to occasional large losses; cards in the other deck offered fewer rewards per trial, but were advantageous overall.Different from the previous studies, the intension of rewards and punishment was manipulated in this study.The results showed that ADHD children were impaired in affective decision-making, and generated lower anticipatory SCRs during the later part of task before choosing from disadvantage card compared with normal controls at the conditions of instant rewards, but were intact at the condition of instant punishment.No significant differences were observed between the two subtypes of ADHD. The results of which suggested that the children with the two subtypes of ADHD only have aberrant sensibility to rewards, therefore impaired their decision-making.However, they showed the same pattern with normal children when avoiding punishment.

Key words:affective decision-making,the Gambling task,Skin conductance recordings,subtypes of ADHD

ReleaseDate:2014-07-21 14:25:34



1 Clark L, Manes F, Antoun N, et al.The contributions of lesion laterality and lesion volume to decision-making impairment following frontal lobe damage.Neuropsychologia,2003,41(11):1474~1483

2 Barkley R A.Issues in the diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children.Brain and Development,2003,25(2):77~83

3 Barkley R A.Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD.Psychological Bulletin,1997,121(1):65~94

4 Wang Y H, Zhou X L, Wang Y F, et al.Response inhibition in two subtypes of children with ADHD (in Chinese).Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2005, 37 (2): 178~188(王勇慧,周晓林,王玉凤等.两种亚型ADHD儿童在停止信号任务中的反应抑制.心理学报,2005,37(2):178~188)

5 Sergeant J A, Geurts H, Oosterlaan J.How specific is a deficit of executive functioning for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.Behavioural Brain Research, 2002, 130: 3~28

6 Sergeant J A.The cognitive-energetic model: An empirical approach to attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.Neuroscience Biobehavioral Review, 2000, 24 (1): 7~12

7 Sergeant J A.Modeling Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A critical appraisal of the Cognitive-Energetic Model.Biological Psychiatry, 2005, 57 (11): 1248~1255

8 Luman M, Oosterlaan J, Sergeant J A.The impact of reinforcement contingencies on ADHD: A review and theoretical appraisal.Clinical Psychology Review, 2005, 25 (2): 183~213

9 Sergeant J A, Geurts H, Huijbregts S, et al.The top and the bottom of ADHD: a neuropsychological perspective.Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 2003, 27 (7): 583~592

10 Johansen E B, Sagvolden T.Response disinhibition may be explained as an extinction deficit in an animal model of ADHD.Behavioural brain research, 2004, 149 (2): 183~196

11 Kollins S H, Shapiro S K, Newland M C, et al.Discriminative and participant-rated effects of methylphenidate in children diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 1998, 6 (4): 375~389

12 Carlson C L, Mann M, Alexander D K.Effects of reinforcement on the performance and motivation of ADHD children.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 2000, 24 (1): 87~98

13 van Meel C S, Oosterlaan J, Heslenfeld D J, et al.Motivational effects on Motor Timing in Attention-Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder.Journal of American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2005, 44 (5): 451~460

14 Oosterlaan J, Sergeant J A.Effects of reward and response cost on response inhibition in ADHD, disruptive, anxious, and normal children.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology,1998,26(3):161~174

15 Bechara A.The role of emotion in decision-making: Evidence from neurological patients with orbitofrontal damage.Brain and Cognition, 2004, 55 (1): 30~40

16 Ernst M, Kimes A S, London E D, et al.Neural substrates of decision making in adults with ADHD.The American Journal of Psychiatry, 2003, 160 (6): 1061~1070

17 Fishbein D, Hyde C, Eldreth D, et al.Cognitive performance and autonomic reactivity in abstinent drug abusers and nonusers.Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology,2005,13(1):25~40

18 Bechara A.Risky business: emotion, decision-making and addiction.Journal of gambling studies, 2003, 19 (1): 23~25

19 Bechara A, Damasio H, Damasio A R. Emotion, decision making and the orbito-frontal cortex. Cerebral cortex, 2000, 10 (3): 295~307

20 Sonuga-Barke E J S.Psychological heterogeneity in ADHD-A dual pathway model of behaviour and cognition.Behavioural Brain Research, 2002, 130: 29~36

21 Crone E A, Jennings R, van der Molen M W.Sensitivity to interference and response contingencies in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.Journal of Children Psychology and Psychiatry, 2003, 44 (2): 214~226.

22 Suzuki A, Hirota A, Takasawa N, et al.Application of the somatic marker hypothesis to individual differences in decision making. Biological Psychology, 2003, 65 (1): 81~88

23 van Meel C S, Oosterlaan J, Heslenfeld D J, et al.Telling good from bad news: ADHD differentially affects processing of positive and negative feedback during guessing.Neuropsychologia, 2005, 43 (13): 1946~1954.

24 Crone E A.Vendel I, van der Molen M W.Decision-making in disinhibited adolescents and adults: to future consequences or driven by immediate reward.Personality and Individual Differences, 2003, 35 (7): 1625~1641

25 Corr P J.Gray's reinforcement sensitivity theory: Tests of the joint subsystems hypothesis of anxiety and impulsivity.Personality and Individual Differences, 2002, 33 (4): 511~532

26 Braaten E B, Beiderman J, Monuteaux M C, et al.Revisiting the association between attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder and anxiety disorders: A familial risk analysis.Biological Psychiatry, 2003, 53 (1): 93~99

27 Bechara A, Tranel D, Damasio H.Characterization of the decision-making deficit of patients with ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions.Brain, 2000, 123 (11): 2189~2202

28 Boyce W T, Qas J, Alkon A, et al.Autonomic reactivity and psychopathology in middle childhood.The British Journal of Psychiatry.2001, 179: 144~150

29 Steinberg L.Cognitive and affective development in adolescence.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2005, 9 (2): 69~74

30 Kerr A, Zelazo P D.Development of "hot" executive function: The children's gambling task.Brain and Cognition, 2004, 55 (1): 148~157

PDF