DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.00359

Acta Psychologica Sinica (心理学报) 2017/49:3 PP.359-369

Family supportive supervisor behavior and marital satisfaction among Chinese dual-earner couples: Testing a positive spillover-crossover model

Marital satisfaction has become an increasingly important research topic due to the increasing divorce rates in mainland China in the past decade. To understand potential causes of decreased marital satisfaction, previous studies have mainly focused on the negative effects of employees' work demands. However, this approach has limited implications for practice for several reasons. First, emphasizing the negative influence of work demands on marital satisfaction may negatively impact employees' work attitude, because to maintain a successful marriage is a central task of adult development. Second, even when organizations realize that work demands are harmful to employees' marital satisfaction, they still may not be able to reduce the work demands due to intense market competition. Given these reasons, identifying poten tial factors to improve martial satisfaction may have more achievable practical implications, and researchers have begun to investigate the positive effect of work resources on employees' family roles. In line with this trend, the primary goal of this study was to examine the relationship between family supportive supervisor behavior (FSSB) and dual-earner couples' marital satisfaction.
Drawing upon prior research on social support and the resource-gain-development perspective, the present study tested a positive spillover-crossover model in which FSSB is predicted to promote work-to-family enrichment that increases the reciprocal effect of social support between husbands and wives, and the reciprocal effect will further positively predict the couple's marital satisfaction. We surveyed 370 Chinese dual-earner couples to measure their FSSB, work-to-family enrichment, spousal support and marital satisfaction. Structural equation modeling (SEM) and dyadic data analysis method were used to test the hypotheses. Additionally, whether having children under the age of 18 and whether having elderly domestic helpers were statistically controlled in all hypothesis testing.
Analysis results largely provided support for the proposed positive spillover-crossover model. First, FSSB was positively related to the couple's marital satisfaction, and FSSB positively predicted spousal support through increased work-to-family enrichment. Second, work-to-family enrichment positively predicted marital satisfaction through increased spousal support. Third, wives' and husbands' spousal support had a reciprocal positive impact on each other. Fourth, husbands' marital satisfaction positively predicted wives' marital satisfaction, but not the other way around. Lastly, husbands' marital satisfaction mediated the positive effect of both husbands' and wives' FSSB on wives' marital satisfaction.
The present study examined the effect of FSSB on employee's family life outcomes based on a system approach, and demonstrated the important effect of FSSB on dual-earner couples' marital satisfaction. Our findings suggests that FSSB can be an important resources to promote dual-earner couples' marital satisfaction. Since previous research have shown that supervisors' FSSB could be improved by supervisor training and self-monitoring intervention, organizations can potentially promote dual-earner couples' marital satisfaction by implementing these programs designed to increase supervisors' FSSB.

Key words:family supportive supervisor behavior,marital satisfaction,positive spillover-crossover model,spousal support,work-to-family enrichment

ReleaseDate:2017-04-10 17:47:50

Bagger, J., & Li, A. (2014). How does supervisory family support influence employees' attitudes and behaviors? A social exchange perspective. Journal of Management, 40(4), 1123-1150.

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2013). The spillover-crossover model. In J. G. Grzywacz & E. Demerouti (Eds.), New frontiers in work and family research (pp. 54-70). Hove:Psychology Press.

Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Burke, R. (2009). Workaholism and relationship quality:A spillover-crossover perspective. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14, 23-33.

Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Dollard, M. F. (2008). How job demands affect partners' experience of exhaustion:Integrating work-family conflict and crossover theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4), 901-911.

Bakker, A. B., Shimazu, A., Demerouti, E., Shimada, K., & Kawakami, N. (2013). Work engagement versus workaholism:A test of the spillover-crossover model. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 29(1), 63-80.

Boeding, S. E., Pukay-Martin, N. D., Baucom, D. H., Porter, L. S., Kirby, J. S., Gremore, T. M., & Keefe, F. J. (2014). Couples and breast cancer:Women's mood and partners' marital satisfaction predicting support perception. Journal of Family Psychology, 28(5), 675-683.

Cai, L. (2013). The impacts of familial factors on the marital satisfaction of contemporary youth:Based on the empirical investigation of Huibei province. Contemporary Youth Research, (3), 56-62.

[蔡玲. (2013). 青年婚姻满意度影响因素研究. 当代青年研究, (3), 56-62.]

Chen, L. H., & Li, T. S. (2012). Role balance and marital satisfaction in Taiwanese couples:An actor-partner interdependence model approach. Social Indicators Research, 107(1), 187-199.

Cutrona, C. E. (1996). Social support as a determinant of marital quality. In G. R. Pierce, B. R. Sarason, & I. G. Sarason (Eds.), Handbook of social support and the family (pp. 173-194). US:Springer.

Dehle, C., Larsen, D., & Landers, J. E. (2001). Social support in marriage. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 29(4), 307-324.

Demerouti, E. (2012). The spillover and crossover of resources among partners:The role of work-self and family-self facilitation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17, 184-195.

Duan, J. Y., & Chen, W. P. (2012). Ambulatory-assessment based sampling method:Experience sampling method. Advances in Psychological Science, 20(7), 1110-1120.

[段锦云, 陈文平. (2012). 基于动态评估的取样法:经验取样法. 心理科学进展, 20(7), 1110-1120.]

Feeney, B. C., & Collins, N. L. (2015). A new look at social support:A theoretical perspective on thriving through relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19(2) 113-147.

Ferguson, M., Carlson, D., Boswell, W., Whitten, D., Butts, M. M., & Kacmar, K. M. (2016). Tethered to work:A family systems approach linking mobile device use to turnover intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(4), 520-534.

Ferguson, M., Carlson, D., & Kacmar, K. M. (2015). Flexing work boundaries:The spillover and crossover of workplace support. Personnel Psychology, 68(3), 581-614.

Gleason, M. E. J., Iida, M., Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2008). Receiving support as a mixed blessing:Evidence for dual effects of support on psychological outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(5), 824-838.

Greenhaus, J. H., Ziegert, J. C., & Allen, T. D. (2012). When family-supportive supervision matters:Relations between multiple sources of support and work-family balance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(2), 266-275.

Hammer, L. B., Kossek, E. E., Anger, W. K., Bodner, T., & Zimmerman, K. L. (2011). Clarifying work-family intervention processes:The roles of work-family conflict and family-supportive supervisor behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(1), 134-150.

Hammer, L. B., Kossek, E. E., Bodner, T., & Crain, T. (2013). Measurement development and validation of the family supportive supervisor behavior short-form (FSSB-SF). Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18(3), 285-296.

Hammer, L. B., Kossek, E. E., Yragui, N. L., Bodner, T. E., & Hanson, G. C. (2009). Development and validation of a multidimensional measure of family supportive supervisor behaviors (FSSB). Journal of Management, 35(4), 837-856.

Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1994). Emotional contagion. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

Jiang, H., Ma, H. Y., Xie, J. L., & Zhang, S. X. (2015). The effects of family-supported supervisor behavior on work attitudes:A moderated mediating model. Journal of Psychological Science, 38(5), 1194-1200.

[姜海, 马红宇, 谢菊兰, 张淑霞. (2015). 家庭支持型主管行为对员工工作态度的影响:有调节的中介效应分析. 心理科学, 38(5), 1194-1200.]

Kenny, D. A., & Acitelli, L. K. (2001). Accuracy and bias in the perception of the partner in a close relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 439-448.

Kossek, E. E., Baltes, B. B., & Matthews, R. A. (2011). How work-family research can finally have an impact in organizations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 4(3), 352-369.

Kossek, E. E., Hammer, L. B., Kelly, E. L., & Moen, P. (2014). Designing work, family & health organizational change initiatives. Organizational Dynamics, 43(1), 53-63.

Liu, H. M., Ngo, H. Y., & Cheung, F. M. (2016). Work-family enrichment and marital satisfaction among Chinese couples:A crossover-spillover perspective. International Journal of Stress Management, 23(2), 209-231.

Lu, L., Chang, T.-T., Kao, S.-F., & Cooper, C. L. (2015). Testing an integrated model of the work-family interface in Chinese employees:A longitudinal study. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 18(1), 12-21.

Ma, H. Y., Xie, J. L., Tang, H. Y., Shen, C. G., & Zhang, X. X. (2016). Relationship between working through information and communication technologies after hours and well-being among Chinese dual-earner couples:A spillover-crossover perspective. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 48(1), 48-58.

[马红宇, 谢菊兰, 唐汉瑛, 申传刚, 张晓翔. (2016). 工作性通信工具使用与双职工夫妻的幸福感:基于溢出-交叉效应的分析. 心理学报, 48(1), 48-58.]

Matthews, R. A., Mills, M. J., Trout, R. C., & English, L. (2014). Family-supportive supervisor behaviors, work engagement, and subjective well-being:A contextually dependent mediated process. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19(2), 168-181.

McHale, S. M., Lawson, K. M., Davis, K. D., Casper, L., Kelly, E. L., & Buxton, O. (2015). Effects of a workplace intervention on sleep in employees' children. Journal of Adolescent Health, 56(6), 672-677.

Mills, M. J., Matthews, R. A., Henning, J. B., & Woo, V. A. (2014). Family-supportive organizations and supervisors:How do they influence employee outcomes and for whom? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(12), 1763-1785.

Newman, D. A. (2014). Missing data:Five practical guidelines. Organizational Research Methods, 17(4), 372-411.

Odle-Dusseau, H. N., Britt, T. W., & Greene-Shortridge, T. M. (2012). Organizational work-family resources as predictors of job performance and attitudes:The process of work-family conflict and enrichment. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17(1), 28-40.

Reis, H. T. (2012). Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing theme for the study of relationships and well-being. In L. Campbell & T. J. Loving (Eds.), Interdisciplinary research on close relationships:The case for integration (pp. 27-52). Washington, DC:American Psychological Association.

Rodríguez-Muñoz, A., Sanz-Vergel, A. I., Demerouti, E., & Bakker, A. B. (2014). Engaged at work and happy at home:A spillover-crossover model. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(2), 271-283.

Sanz-Vergel, A. I., Rodríguez-Muñoz, A., & Nielsen, K. (2015). The thin line between work and home:The spillover and crossover of daily conflicts. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 88(1), 1-18.

Sullivan, K. T., Pasch, L. A., Johnson, M. D., & Bradbury, T. N. (2010). Social support, problem solving, and the longitudinal course of newlywed marriage. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(4), 631-644.

van Steenbergen, E. F., Kluwer, E. S., & Karney, B. R. (2014). Work-family enrichment, work-family conflict, and marital satisfaction:A dyadic analysis. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19(2), 182-194.

Vinokur, A. D., & van Ryn, M. (1993). Social support and undermining in close relationships:Their independent effects on the mental health of unemployed persons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(2), 350-359.

Wang, X. D., Wang, X. L., & Ma, H. (1999). Rating scales for Mental health (updated version). Beijing:Chinese Mental Health Magazine Publishing.

[汪向东, 王希林, 马弘. (1999). 心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版). 北京:中国心理卫生杂志社.]

Wayne, J. H., Musisca, N., & Fleeson, W. (2004). Considering the role of personality in the work-family experience:Relationships of the big five to work-family conflict and facilitation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64(1), 108-130.

Wayne, J. H., Grzywacz, J. G., Carlson, D. S., & Kacmar, K. M. (2007). Work-family facilitation:A theoretical explanation and model of primary antecedents and consequences. Human Resource Management Review, 17(1), 63-76.

Westman, M. (2001). Stress and strain crossover. Human Relations, 54(6), 717-751.

Westman, M., Vinokur, A. D., Hamilton, V. L., & Roziner, I. (2004). Crossover of marital dissatisfaction during military downsizing among Russian army officers and their spouses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 769-779.

Williams, J. C., Berdahl, J. L., & Vandello, J. A. (2016). Beyond work-life "Integration". Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 515-539.

Yang, C. Y., Decety, J., Lee, S., Chen, C. Y., & Cheng, Y. W. (2009). Gender differences in the mu rhythm during empathy for pain:An electroencephalographic study. Brain Research, 1251, 176-184.