doi:

DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.00393

Acta Psychologica Sinica (心理学报) 2017/49:3 PP.393-403

The effect of anger and sadness on prosocial decision making: The role of the interpersonal attribution of responsibility


Abstract:
Previous research suggested that emotions have an effect on prosocial decision making depending on the dimensions of emotional valence, little research has verified the role of specific emotions of the same valence. Drawing on the Appraisal-Tendency Framework (ATF), the present set of studies aimed to explore the carryover effect of two incidentally negative emotions, i.e. anger and sadness, on prosocial decision making and the role of the interpersonal attribution of responsibility in this effect.
We conducted two studies, where emotions were induced via the Autobiographical Emotional Memory Task (AEMT). Study 1 investigated the effects of anger and sadness on prosocial decision making with a between-subjects design. Participants were randomly assigned to angry, sad, or neutral conditions and were asked to indicate how much time they were willing to spend helping others. Study 2 explored whether the effects of anger and sadness on prosocial decision making depend on interpersonal attribution of responsibility. This study employed a 2 (emotions:anger/sadness)×3 (interpersonal attribution of responsibility:ambiguity/uncontrollable and external situation/controllable situation and recipient own) mixed design with emotions as a between-subjects variable. Participants were randomly assigned to angry or sad conditions. Similar to study 1, emotions were induced through AEMT. Interpersonal attribution of responsibility was manipulated by varying the information about the person who needs help. In the ambiguity condition, the reason that the person needs help is not clear; in the uncontrollable and external situation condition, the reason that the person needs help is due to uncontrollable external situation; in the controllable situation and recipient own condition, the person who is in need of help is responsible for such circumstance. Prosocial decision making was measured by the amount of money participants were willing to donate.
Across two studies we found that:(1) Participants in the sad condition were willing to spend more time and donate more money to others than their counterparts in the angry and neutral conditions. (2) Under the condition of ambiguous attribution of responsibility, participants who experienced sadness were more willing to help others compared to those in angry condition; in the uncontrollable and external situation conditions, and controllable situation and recipient own conditions, anger and sadness had similar effects on helping behavior. (3) In the sad condition, compared to ambiguous attribution of responsibility, participants were more willing to help when the responsibility was attributed to uncontrollable and external situation, whereas participants were less willing to help when the responsibility was attributed to the person who needs help. In the angry condition, participants were more willing to help when the responsibility was attributed to uncontrollable and external situation rather than when it was ambiguous or when the recipients were blamed.
We conclude that (a) Incidental emotions of the same valence have different effects of carrying over on prosocial decision making-sadness facilitates helping behavior while anger impedes prosocial decision making, and (b) Interpersonal attribution of responsibility contributes to such effect. Anger and sadness have opposing effects on prosocial decision making only when the interpersonal attribution of responsibility remains ambiguous. These findings have important implications for understanding the mechanism underlying the impacts of different incidental emotions of the same valence on prosocial decision making.

Key words:anger,sadness,prosocial decision making,interpersonal attribution of responsibility,incidental emotions

ReleaseDate:2017-04-10 17:47:51



Angie, A. D., Connelly, S., Waples, E. P., & Kligyte, V. (2011). The influence of discrete emotions on judgement and decision-making:A meta-analytic review. Cognition and Emotion, 25(8), 1393-1422.

Applebaum, L. D. (2001). The influence of perceived deservingness on policy decisions regarding aid to the poor. Political Psychology, 22(3), 419-442.

Barasch, A., Levine, E. E., Berman, J. Z., & Small, D. A. (2014). Selfish or selfless? On the signal value of emotion in altruistic behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(3), 393-413.

Bullock, H. E., Williams, W. R., & Limbert, W. M. (2003). Predicting support for welfare policies:The impact of attributions and beliefs about inequality. Journal of Poverty, 7(3), 35-56.

Cassese, E., & Weber, C. (2011). Emotion, attribution, and attitudes toward crime. Journal of Integrated Social Sciences, 2(1), 63-97.

Cnaan, R. A., Jones, K., Dickin, A., & Salomon, M. (2011). Nonprofit watchdogs:Do they serve the average donor? Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 21, 381-397.

Darley, J. M., & Gross, P. H. (1983). A hypothesis-confirming bias in labeling effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 20-33.

Diekman, A. B., & Clark, E. K. (2015). Beyond the damsel in distress:Gender differences and similarities in enacting prosocial behavior. In D. A. Schroeder & W. G. Graziano (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of prosocial behavior (pp. 376-391). New York, NY:Oxford University Press.

Feigenson, N., & Park, J. (2006). Emotions and attributions of legal responsibility and blame:A research review. Law and Human Behavior, 30(2), 143-161.

Forgas, J. P., Dunn, E., & Granland, S. (2008). Are you being served…? An unobtrusive experiment of affective influences on helping in a department store. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(2), 333-342.

Gino, F., & Mogilner, C. (2014). Time, money, and morality. Psychological Science, 25(2), 414-421.

Gutnik, L. A., Hakimzada, A. F., Yoskowitz, N. A., & Patel, V. L. (2006). The role of emotion in decision-making:A cognitive neuroeconomic approach towards understanding sexual risk behavior. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 39(6), 720-736.

Hill, S. E., DelPriore, D. J., & Vaughan, P. W. (2011). The cognitive consequences of envy:Attention, memory, and self-regulatory depletion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(4), 653-666.

Kandrack, R., & Lundberg, G. (2014). On the influence of emotion on decision making:The case of charitable giving. In P. J. Guo & W. Pedrycz (Eds.), Human-centric decision-making models for social sciences (pp. 57-73). Berlin Heidelberg:Springer.

Keltner, D., Ellsworth, P. C., & Edwards, K. (1993). Beyond simple pessimism:Effects of sadness and anger on social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(5), 740-752.

Lamy, L., Fischer-Lokou, J., & Guéguen, N. (2012). Priming emotion concepts and helping behavior:How unlived emotions can influence action. Social Behavior and Personality:An International Journal, 40(1), 55-61.

Lerner, J. S., Gonzalez, R. M., Small, D. A., & Fischhoff, B. (2003). Effects of fear and anger on perceived risks of terrorism a national field experiment. Psychological Science, 14(2), 144-150.

Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2000). Beyond valence:Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgement and choice. Cognition and Emotion, 14(4), 473-493.

Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 146-159.

Lerner, J. S., Li, Y., Valdesolo, P., & Kassam, K. S. (2015). Emotion and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 799-823.

Lerner, J. S., Small, D. A., & Loewenstein, G. (2004). Heart strings and purse strings. Carryover effects of emotions on economic decisions. Psychological Science, 15(5), 337-341.

Li, J. B., & Huang, X. T. (2014). The effects of accounting for time on prosocial behaviors. Psychological Science, 37(4), 925-929.

[李继波, 黄希庭. (2014). 时间定价对亲社会行为的影响. 心理科学, 37(4), 925-929.]

Loersch, C., & Payne, B. K. (2012). On mental contamination:The role of (mis)attribution in behavior priming. Social Cognition, 30(2), 241-252.

Major, L. H. (2011). The mediating role of emotions in the relationship between frames and attribution of responsibility for health problems. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 88(3), 502-522.

Manucia, G. K., Baumann, D. J., & Cialdini, R. B. (1984). Mood influences on helping:Direct effects or side effects? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(2), 357-364.

Mills, C., & D'Mello, S. (2014). On the validity of the autobiographical emotional memory task for emotion induction. PLoS One, 9(4), e95837.

Nelson, L. D., & Norton, M. I. (2005). From student to superhero:Situational primes shape future helping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(4), 423-430.

Peng, X. F., Xie, D. G., & Zhang D. J. (2013). The spotlight effect of anger:How the incidental anger influence our judgment on the social news report. Psychological Development and Education, 29(6), 578-587.

[彭小凡, 谢德光, 张大均. (2013). 愤怒的聚光灯效应对个体新闻阅读的归因影响. 心理发展与教育, 29(6), 578-587.]

Qiu, L., Zheng, X., & Wang, Y. F. (2009). Revision of the positive affect and negative affect scale. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology, 14(3), 249-254.

[邱林, 郑雪, 王雁飞. (2009). 积极情感消极情感量表(PANAS)的修订. 应用心理学, 14(3), 249-254.]

Quigley, B. M., & Tedeschi, J. T. (1996). Mediating effects of blame attributions on feelings of anger. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(12), 1280-1288.

Raghunathan, R., & Pham, M. T. (1999). All negative moods are not equal:Motivational influences of anxiety and sadness on decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79(1), 56-77.

Roseman, I. (1984). Cognitive determinants of emotions:A structural theory. In P. Shaver (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology:Vol. 5. Emotions, relationships, and health (pp. 11-36). Beverly Hills:Sage.

Sharma, P. (2015). Positive and negative affect:Impact on empathy and prosocial behaviour among college going adolescents. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 2(3), 12-17.

Small, D. A., & Lerner, J. S. (2008). Emotional policy:Personal sadness and anger shape judgments about a welfare case. Political Psychology, 29(2), 149-168.

Smith, C. A., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(4), 813-838.

Solloway, T., Slater, M. D., Chung, A., & Goodall, C. E. (2013). Anger, sadness, and fear responses to crime and accident news stories:How emotions influence alcohol-control policies support via risk concern. Journal of Media Psychology, 25(4), 160-170.

Tsai, W. C., Chen, C. C., & Liu, H. L. (2007). Test of a model linking employee positive moods and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1570-1583.

Uleman, J. S., & Bargh, J. A. (1989). Unintended thought. New York:Guilford.

Wagner, M. (2014). Fear and anger in great britain:Blame assignment and emotional reactions to the financial crisis. Political Behavior, 36(3), 683-703.

Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect:The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070.

Weiner, B. (1980). A cognitive (attribution)-emotion-action model of motivated behavior:An analysis of judgments of help-giving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(2), 186-200.

Weiner, B. (1995). Judgments of responsibility:A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York:Guilford.

Weiner, B., Osborne, D., & Rudolph, U. (2011). An attributional analysis of reactions to poverty:The political ideology of the giver and the perceived morality of the receiver. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(2), 199-213.

Winterich, K. P., Han, S., & Lerner, J. S. (2010). Now that I'm sad, it's hard to be mad:The role of cognitive appraisals in emotional blunting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(11), 1467-1483.

Yang, Z. X., & Tong, E. M. W. (2010). The effects of subliminal anger and sadness primes on agency appraisals. Emotion, 10(6), 915-922.

Zhang, A. Q., & Liu, H. S. (2002). The interpersonal attribution of responsibility and the will of helping. Psychological Development and Education, (4), 1-5.

[张爱卿, 刘华山. (2002). 人际责任归因与助人意愿的关系. 心理发展与教育, (4), 1-5.]

Zhang, J. W., Xu, F. M., Liu, T. F., Chen, X. L., & Jiang, D. (2010). Time as value in behavioral decision making:A comparison between time and money. Advances in Psychological Science, 18(10), 1574-1579.

[张军伟, 徐富明, 刘腾飞, 陈雪玲, 蒋多. (2010). 行为决策中作为价值的时间:基于与金钱的比较. 心理科学进展, 18(10), 1574-1579.]

Zhang, W. D., Diao, J., & Schick, C. J. (2004). The cross-cultural measurement of positive and negative affect examining the dimensionality of PANAS. Psychological Science, 27(1), 77-79.

[张卫东, 刁静, Schick, C. J. (2004). 正、负性情绪的跨文化心理测量:PANAS维度结构检验. 心理科学, 27(1), 77-79.]