doi:

DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.00416

Acta Psychologica Sinica (心理学报) 2017/49:3 PP.416-426

The orientation of Bruner's psychological research at his later age and its academic relevance


Abstract:
Bruner is one of the most creative and open-minded psychologists and educationists in the world. Moreover, he is also one of the leading figures in the first and the second cognitive revolution. Since 1990s, Bruner's research showed a distinctive change in the academic orientation, which had made a significant contribution to cognitive psychology, cultural psychology, anthropology as well as theoretical psychology. His excellent achievements at his later years involved various fields including psychology, education, anthropology and law. Through plenty of researches and observations, Bruner finally realized that human behavior was always affected by the involved culture. His work helped to keep the field of psychology away from strict behaviorism, and made contribution to the development of cognitive and cultural psychology. Many scholars emphasized the orientation of Bruner's thoughts at his later age. This article seeks to reflect the important value of Bruner's academic achievements at his later age, and reveal his reflection on cognitive revolution and theoretical framework of cultural psychology. Bruner promoted the gain momentum of second cognitive revolution, which echoed the global development of psychology. He also reflected on the development of cognitive psychology, suggesting that cognition could be seen as individual's activity in real life. Bruner established the foundation of cognitive psychology by applying a constructivist theory. Meanwhile, he developed a new framework for cultural psychology by emphasizing the importance of cultural transmission in the development of human mind and its general intelligence. In this framework, Bruner explained that human mind reflected the evolution of biological, cultural construction and exposure to the practice of interaction among biological, cultural and practical properties, which acted like an integrated complex process. Furthermore, Bruner made great effort in unravelling the plight of empirical approach and in exploring the way to psychology integration. His innovative understanding of problems in psychology and foresights for future studies also served as an important guide for the field of interest. Bruner attributed his success to the openness of the eyes. As a people who was born blind and restored sight later, these experiences made him sensitive to the new. The secret of people fascinating him throughout his life, his spirit always inspire future researchers continue to complete his unfinished work.

Key words:Bruner,cognitive revolution,meaning construction,cultural psychology,theoretical psychology

ReleaseDate:2017-04-10 17:47:52



Ames, D. L., & Fiske, S. T. (2010). Cultural neuroscience. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 72-82.

Anastasi, A. (1992). A century of psychological science. American Psychologist, 47(7), 842-843.

Arnett, J. J. (2009). The neglected 95%, a challenge to psychology's philosophy of science. American Psychologist, 64(6), 571-574.

Ataria, Y. (2016). Body without a self, self without body. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 36(1), 29-40.

Bakhurst, D., & Shanker, S. G. (2001). Jerome Bruner:Language, culture and self (p. 5). London:Sage.

Bem, S., & de Jong, H. L. (2013). Theoretical issues in psychology:An introduction (3rd ed., pp. 15-17). London:Sage.

Benedict, C. (2016-06-08). Jerome S. Bruner, who shaped understanding of the young mind, dies at 100. The New York Time.

Bruner, J. S. (1991). The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 18, 1-21.

Bruner, J. S. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.

Bruner, J. S. (1997). Celebrating divergence:Piaget and Vygotsky. Human Development, 40, 63-73.

Bruner, J. S. (2006). Making stories:Law, literature, life (M. L. Sun, Trans.). Beijing:Educational Science Publishing House. (Original work published 2003)

[布鲁纳, J. S. (2006). 故事的形成:法律、文学、生活(孙玫璐译). 北京:教育科学出版社.]

Bruner, J. S. (2008). Culture and mind:Their fruitful incommensurability. Ethos, 36(1), 29-45.

Bruner, J. S. (2011). Acts of meaning (Z. M. Wei, Trans., 2nd ed.). Changchun:Jilin People's Publishing House. (Original work published 1990)

[布鲁纳, J. S. (2011). 有意义的行为(魏志敏译, 第2版). 长春:吉林人民出版社.]

Bruner, J. S. (2012). The culture of education & the process of education (W. L. Song & X. P. Huang, Trans., 2nd ed.). Beijing:Capital Normal University Press. (Original work published 1960, 1996)

[布鲁纳, J. S. (2012). 布鲁纳教育文化观(宋文里, 黄小鹏译, 第2版). 北京:首都师范大学出版社.]

Bruner, J. S. (2015). The uneasy relation of culture and mind. History of the Human Sciences, 28(2), 8-9.

Charon, R. (2007). What to do with stories:The sciences of narrative medicine. Canadian Family Physician, 53(8), 1265-1267.

Chung, M. C., & Hyland, M. E. (2012). History and philosophy of psychology (pp. 20-21). Malden:Wiley-Blackwell.

Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology:A once and future discipline (pp. 9-32). Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.

Cooper, C. R., & Denner, J. (1998). Theories linking culture and psychology:Universal and community-specific processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 559-584.

Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology (pp. 25-34). London:Sage.

Evers, C. W. (2007). Culture, cognitive pluralism and rationality. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 39, 364-382.

Fear, W. J., & Azambuja, R. (2014). Narrative and deliberative instauration:The use of narrative as process and artefact in the social construction of institutions. Learning Culture and Social Interaction, 3, 286-295.

Fei, D. Y. (2008). Cognitive research in hermeneutic dimension. Philosophical Researches, (5), 92-99.

[费多益. (2008). 认知研究的解释学之维. 哲学研究, (5), 92-99.]

Fowers, B. J. (2015). The promise of a flourishing theoretical psychology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 35(3), 145-159.

Gardner, H. (1992). Scientific psychology:Should we bury it or praise it? New Ideas in Psychology, 10, 179-190.

Gauvain, M., & Munroe, R. L. (2009). Contributions of societal modernity to cognitive development:A comparison of four cultures. Child Development, 80(6), 1628-1642.

Geertz, C. (1997). Learning with Bruner. The New York Review of Books, 17(6), 23.

Gergen, K. J. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 40, 266-275.

Hardin, E. E., Robitschek, C., Flores, L. Y., Navarro, R. L., & Ashton, M. W. (2014). The cultural lens approach to evaluating cultural validity of psychological theory. American Psychologist, 69(7), 656-668.

Harré, R. (1992). The second cognitive revolution. American Behavioral Scientist, 36(1), 5-7.

Henriques, G. R. (2008). Special section:The problem of psychology and the integration of human knowledge:Contrasting Wilson's consilience with the tree of knowledge system. Theory & Psychology, 18(6), 731-755.

Kashdan, T. B., & Steger, M. F. (2004). Approaching psychological science with Kuhn's eyes. American Psychologist, 59(2), 272-273.

Kelly, R. J. (1998). Jerome Bruner:The tireless explorer. Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless, 7(4), 289-302.

Kirsten, W. (2015). The centenarian psychologist. The American Psychological Association, 46(5), 48.

Lash, A., & Wingfield, A. (2014) A Bruner-Potter effect in audition? Spoken word recognition in adult aging. Psychology and Aging, 29(4), 907-912.

Li, B. Q. (2007). Cultural psychology (p. 69). Shanghai:Shanghai Educational Publishing House.

[李炳全. (2007). 文化心理学(p. 69). 上海:上海教育出版社.]

Li, Q. W. (2008). Cognitive revolution and second-generation cognitive science. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 40(12), 1306-1327.

[李其维. (2008). "认知革命"与"第二代认知科学"刍议. 心理学报, 40(12), 1306-1327.]

Lutkehaus, N. C. (2008). Putting "culture" into cultural psychology:Anthropology's role in the development of Bruner's cultural psychology. Ethos, 36(1), 46-59.

Lutkehaus, N. C., & Greenfield, P. M. (2003). From the process of education to the culture of education:An intellectual biography of Jerome Bruner's contributions to education. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Educational psychology:A century of contributions (pp. 421-425). New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

Matt, S. (2016-06-08). Jerome S. Bruner, influential psychologist of perception, dies at 100. The Washington Post.

Mattingly, C. (2008). Reading minds and telling tales in a cultural borderland. Ethos, 36(1), 136-154.

Mattingly, C., Lutkehaus, N. C., & Throop, C. J. (2008). Bruner's search for meaning:A conversation between psychology and anthropology. Ethos, 36(1), 1-28.

Monteagudo, J. G. (2011). Jerome Bruner and the challenges of the narrative turn:Then and now. Narrative Inquiry, 21(2), 295-302.

Nwoye, A. (2015). African psychology and the Africentric paradigm to clinical diagnosis and treatment. South African Journal of Psychology, 45(3), 305-317.

Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002-1037.

Salkind, N. J. (2006). Encyclopedia of human development. London:Sage.

Shweder, R. A. (1991). Thinking through cultures:Expeditions in cultural psychology (pp. 1-19). Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.

Song, W. L. (2010). The background and the educational significance of the contemporary cultural psychology--review of the culture of education by J. Bruner, former president of association of American psychological. Journal of Research on Education for Ethnic Minorities, 21(6), 23-29.

[宋文里. (2010). 当代文化心理学的缘起及其教育意义--美国心理学会前主席布鲁纳《教育的文化》评述. 民族教育研究, 21(6), 23-29.]

Spence, J. T. (1987). Centrifugal versus centripetal tendencies in psychology:will the center hold? American Psychologist, 42, 1052-1054.

Staats, A. W. (1991). Unified positivism and unification psychology:Fad or new field? American Psychologist, 46, 899-912.

Stam, H. J. (2000). Ten years after, decade to come:The contributions of theory to psychology. Theory & Psychology, 10, 5-21.

Stolk, Y. (2009). Approaches to the influence of culture and language on cognitive assessment instruments:The Australian context. Australian Psychologist, 44(1), 1-5.

Taggart, J. M. (2012). Interpreting the Nahuat dialogue on the envious dead with Jerome Bruner's theory of narrative. Ethos, 40(4), 411-430.

Takaya, K. (2013). From early Bruner to later Bruner. Netherlands:Springer.

Thornton, C. (2012). Renewing the link between cognitive archeology and cognitive science. Journal of Archaeological Science, 39, 2036-2041.

Weber, M. (1999). Gesammelte aufsaetze zur wissenschaftslehre (p. 127). Tubingen:Mohr.

[马克斯·韦伯. (1999). 社会科学方法论(p. 127). 北京:中国人民大学出版社.]

Weisner, T. S. (2011). "If you work in this country you should not be poor, and your kids should be doing better":Bringing mixed methods and theory in psychological anthropology to improve research in policy and practice. Ethos, 39(4), 455-476.

Ye, H. S. (2002). Rethinking about the unity and disunity in western psychology. Acta Psycholagica Sinica, 34(4), 431-436.

[叶浩生. (2002). 有关西方心理学分裂与整合问题的再思考. 心理学报, 34(4), 431-436.]

Ye, H. S. (2003). The second cognitive revolution and the establishment of social constructionism. Advances in Psychological Science, 11(1), 101-107.

[叶浩生. (2003). 第二次认知革命与社会建构论的产生. 心理科学进展, 11(1), 101-107.]

Zhang, A. Q. (2000). Radiating the light of wisdom:Bruner's cognitive and educational psychology. Wuhan:Hubei Education Press.

[张爱卿. (2000). 放射智慧之光--布鲁纳的认知与教育心理学. 武汉:湖北教育出版社.]