doi:

DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.00539

Acta Psychologica Sinica (心理学报) 2017/49:4 PP.539-553

The influence of high commitment organization on employee voice behavior: A dual-process model examination


Abstract:
Voice behavior, one of the ways of employees' participation in making organizational decisions, is more and more significant for the development and innovation of organizations, and it attracts much attention from organizational behavior scholars. Hirschman (1970) is the person who firstly put forward the concept of voice behavior in nearly 40 years ago, and then the studies of voice behavior never stop. Gradually, organizations pay more attention than before to employee relationship with organizations. In the big data era, organizations are facing too many challenges and opportunities. In addition, many researchers have suggested that a variety of factors can influence employees' voice behaviors. High commitment work systems (or high commitment organizations) are popular in successful multinational enterprises such as Microsoft, Procter & Gamble and Disney, and much research had proved that high commitment work systems could lead to more benefits for organizations.
The present study is an examination that we explored roles of high commitment work system, perceived career opportunity, and job satisfaction in predicting voice behavior. We proposed the following hypothesis: (1) High commitment work system has positive effect on employee speaking-up. (2) High commitment work system has positive effect on speaking-out. (3) High commitment work system has positive effect on perceived career opportunity. (4) Perceived career opportunity mediates the relationship between high commitment work system and employee speaking-up. (5) High commitment work system has positive effect on job satisfaction. (6) Job satisfaction mediates the relationship between high commitment work system and employee speaking-out. (7) Performance moderates the relationship between perceived career opportunity and employee speaking-up. (8) Interpersonal relationship moderates the relationship between job satisfaction and employee speaking-out.
The data consists of 223 surveys' responses from 36 organizations. We analyzed the data by using Mplus and SPSS, and the results showed that: (1) High commitment work system has positive effect on voice behavior, including employee speaking-up and speaking-out. (2) Perceived career opportunity mediates the relationship between high commitment work system and employee speaking-up; and job satisfaction mediates the relationship between high commitment work system and employee speaking-out. (3) Employee performance moderates the relationship between perceived career opportunity and employee speaking-up; it also moderates the 'high commitment work system-perceived career opportunity-employee speaking-up' linkage. (4) Interpersonal relationship moderates the relationship between job satisfaction and speaking-out; it also moderates the 'high commitment work system-job satisfaction and-employee speaking-out' linkage. Implications, limitations and future directions of these findings are discussed as well.

Key words:high commitment work system,voice behavior,perceived career opportunity,job satisfaction,interpersonal relationship

ReleaseDate:2017-05-12 17:01:38



Allen, D. G., Shore, L. M., & Griffeth, R. W. (2003). The role of perceived organizational support and supportive human resource practices in the turnover process. Journal of Management, 29(1), 99–118.

Alvarez, S. A., & Busenitz, L. W. (2001). The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory. Journal of Management, 27(6), 755–775.

Ashford, S. J., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Christianson, M. K. (2009). Speaking up and speaking out: The leadership dynamics of voice in organizations. In J. Greenberg & M. Edwards (Eds.), Voice and silence in organizations (pp. 175–202). Bingley, England: Emerald.

Berg, P., Kalleberg, A. L., & Appelbaum, E. (2003). Balancing work and family: The role of high-commitment environments. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 42(2), 168–188.

Blader, S. L., & Tyler, T. R. (2009). Testing and extending the group engagement model: Linkages between social identity, procedural justice, economic outcomes, and extra-role behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 445–464.

Cardador, M. T., Northcraft, G. B., Rockmann, K. W., & Grant, B. C. (2016). Characteristics of affected third parties and cooperative behavior in social dilemmas. The Journal of Social Psychology, 156, 565–580.

Chamberlin, M., Newton, D. W., & LePine, J. A. (2016). A meta-analysis of voice and its promotive and prohibitive forms: Identification of key associations, distinctions, and future research directions. Personnel Psychology, doi: 10.1111/peps.12185

Chang, S., Jia, L. D., Takeuchi, R., & Cai, Y. H. (2014). Do high-commitment work systems affect creativity? A multi-level combinational approach to employee creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(4), 665–680.

Cole, D. A., & Maxwell, S. E. (2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 558–577.

Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900.

Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 869–884.

Duan, J. Y. (2011). The research of employee voice in Chinese context: Construct, formation mechanism and effect. Advances in Psychological Science, 19(2), 185–192. [段锦云. (2011). 中国背景下建言行为研究: 结构、形成机制及影响. 心理科学进展, 19(2), 185–192.]

Duan, J. Y., & Ling, B. (2011). A Chinese indigenous study of the construct of employee voice behavior and the influence of Zhongyong on it. Acta Psychologica Sinica,43(10), 1185–1197. [段锦云, 凌斌. (2011). 中国背景下员工建言行为结构及中庸思维对其的影响. 心理学报, 43(10), 1185–1197.]

Duan, J. Y., Kwan, H. K., & Ling, B. (2014). The role of voice efficacy in the formation of voice behavior: A cross-level examination. Journal of Management & Organization, 20(4), 526–543.

Farh, J.-L., Zhong, C.-B., & Organ, D. W. (2004). Organizational citizenship behavior in the People's Republic of China. Organization Science, 15(2), 241–253.

Ferrin, D. L., Dirks, K. T., & Shah, P. P. (2006). Direct and indirect effects of third-party relationships on interpersonal trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 870–883.

Frazier, M. L., & Fainshmidt, S. (2012). Voice climate, work outcomes, and the mediating role of psychological empowerment: A multilevel examination. Group & Organization Management, 37(6), 691–715.

García-Chas, R., Neira-Fontela, E., & Varela-Neira, C. (2016). High-performance work systems and job satisfaction: A multilevel model. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(2), 451–466.

Glomb, T. M., Bhave, D. P., Miner, A. G., & Wall, M. (2011). Doing good, feeling good: Examining the role of organizational citizenship behaviors in changing mood. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 191–223.

Gould-Williams, J. (2004). The effects of 'high commitment' HRM practices on employee attitude: The views of public sector workers. Public Administration, 82(1), 63–81.

Guthrie, J. P. (2001). High-involvement work practices, turnover, and productivity: Evidence from New Zealand. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 180–190.

Hagedoorn, M., van Yperen, N. W., van De Vliert, E., & Buunk, B. P. (1999). Employees' reactions to problematic events: A circumplex structure of five categories of responses, and the role of job satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(3), 309–321.

Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Hsiung, H.-H. (2012). Authentic leadership and employee voice behavior: A multi-level psychological process. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(3), 349–361.

Ichniowski, C., & Shaw, K. (1999). The effects of human resource management systems on economic performance: An international comparison of U.S. and Japanese plants. Management Science, 45(5), 704–721.

James, L. R. (1982). Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(2), 219–229.

James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 85–98.

Jordan, J. J., Hoffman, M., Bloom, P., & Rand, D. G. (2016). Third-party punishment as a costly signal of trustworthiness. Nature, 530(7591), 473–476.

Kakkar, H., Tangirala, S., Srivastava, N. K., & Kamdar, D. (2016). The dispositional antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101, 1342–1351.

Kooij, D. T. A. M., Jansen, P. G. W., Dikkers, J. S. E., & De Lange, A. H. (2010). The influence of age on the associations between HR practices and both affective commitment and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(8), 1111–1136.

Koys, D. J., & DeCotiis, T. A. (1991). Inductive measures of psychological climate. Human Relations, 44(3), 265–285.

Kraimer, M. L., Seibert, S. E., Wayne, S. J., Liden, R. C., & Bravo, J. (2011). Antecedents and outcomes of organizational support for development: The critical role of career opportunities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3), 485–500.

LePine, J. A., & van Dyne, L. (1998). Predicting voice behavior in work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(6), 853–868.

Liang, J., Farh, C. I. C., & Farh, J.-L. (2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 71–92.

Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2000). An examination of the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relations between the job, interpersonal relationships, and work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 407–416.

Ling, B., Duan, J. Y., & Zhu, Y. L. (2010). Study of the relationship between shyness and employee voice behavior: The moderating role of managerial openness and psychological empowerment. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology, 16(3), 235–242. [凌斌, 段锦云, 朱月龙. (2010). 害羞与进谏行为的关系: 管理开放性与心理授权的调节作用. 应用心理学, 16(3), 235–242.]

Liu, W., Zhu, R. H., & Yang, Y. K. (2010). I warn you because I like you: Voice behavior, employee identifications, and transformational leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(1), 189–202.

McClean, E. J., Burris, E. R., & Detert, J. R. (2013). When does voice lead to exit? It depends on leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 56(2), 525–548.

Morrison, E. W. (2011). Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 373–412.

Morrison, E. W. (2014). Employee voice and silence. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 173–197.

Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2012). Employee voice behavior: A meta-analytic test of the conservation of resources framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(2), 216–234.

Nowak, M. A. (2006). Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science, 314(5805), 1560–1563.

Nowak, M. A., & Sigmund, K. (2005). Evolution of indirect reciprocity. Nature, 437(7063), 1291–1298.

Nowak, M. A., & Roch, S. (2007). Upstream reciprocity and the evolution of gratitude. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274(1610), 605–609.

Ozer, M. (2011). A moderated mediation model of the relationship between organizational citizenship behaviors and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(6), 1328–1336.

Peng, A. C., Schaubroeck, J. M., & Li, Y. H. (2014). Social exchange implications of own and coworkers' experiences of supervisory abuse. Academy of Management Journal, 57(5), 1385–1405.

Petrescu, A. I., & Simmons, R. (2008). Human resource management practices and workers' job satisfaction. International Journal of Manpower, 29(7), 651–667.

Pichler, S. (2012). The social context of performance appraisal and appraisal reactions: A meta-analysis. Human Resource Management, 51(5), 709–732.

Poon, J. M. L. (2004). Effects of performance appraisal politics on job satisfaction and turnover intention. Personnel Review, 33(3), 322–334.

Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational & Behavioral Statistics, 31(4), 437–448.

Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227.

Preacher, K. J., Zyphur, M. J., & Zhang, Z. (2010). A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods, 15(3), 209–233.

Shamsudin, F. M., Subramaniam, C., & Sri Ramalu, S. (2014). The influence of HR practices and job satisfaction on interpersonal deviance in the workplace. Journal of Management & Organization, 20(05), 691–709.

Skarlicki, D. P., & Rupp, D. E. (2010). Dual processing and organizational justice: The role of rational versus experiential processing in third-party reactions to workplace mistreatment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(5), 944–952.

Takeuchi, R., Chen, Z. J., & Cheung, S. Y. (2012). Applying uncertainty management theory to employee voice behavior: An integrative investigation. Personnel Psychology, 65(2), 283–323.

Turillo, C. J., Folger, R., Lavelle, J. J., Umphress, E. E., & Gee, J. O. (2002). Is virtue its own reward? Self-sacrificial decisions for the sake of fairness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89(1), 839–865.

van Dyne, L., Ang, S., & Botero, I. C. (2003). Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1359–1392.

van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 108–119.

Walton, R. E. (1985). From control to commitment in the workplace. Harvard Business Review, 63(2), 77–84.

Wang, Q., Weng, Q. X., McElroy, J. C., Ashkanasy, N. M., & Lievens, F. (2014). Organizational career growth and subsequent voice behavior: The role of affective commitment and gender. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 84(3), 431–441.

Wei, X., Zhang, Z. X., & Chen, X. P. (2015). I will speak up if my voice is socially desirable: A moderated mediating process of promotive versus prohibitive voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(5), 1641–1652.

Welbourne, T. M. (2011). 50 years of voice in HRM. Human Resource Management, 50(1), 1–2.

Wheeler, A. R., Gallagher, V. C., Brouer, R. L., & Sablynski, C. J. (2007). When person-organization (mis)fit and (dis)satisfaction lead to turnover: The moderating role of perceived job mobility. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(2), 203–219.

Wyland, R., Lester, S. W., Ehrhardt, K., & Standifer, R. (2016). An examination of the relationship between the work-school interface, job satisfaction, and job performance. Journal of Business & Psychology, 31(2), 187–203.

Xiao, Z. X., & Björkman, I. (2006). High commitment work systems in Chinese organizations: A preliminary measure. Management and Organization Review, 2(3), 403–422.

Xiao, Z. X., & Tsui, A. S. (2007). When brokers may not work: The cultural contingency of social capital in Chinese high-tech firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 1–31. Zapata-Phelan, C. P., Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., & Livingston, B. (2009). Procedural justice, interactional justice, and task performance: The mediating role of intrinsic motivation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(1), 93–105.