doi:

DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.01031

Acta Psychologica Sinica (心理学报) 2017/49:8 PP.1031-1040

Influence of emotional valence on the spatial simon effect under the vocal response mode


Abstract:
Spatial Simon effect reflects the preference of spatial congruence of stimulus and response location on the information processing when participants respond to a non-spatial stimulus feature, and the emotional valence, among others, may have some influence on this kind of process. Two theories, in which the association of emotional valence and spatial cognition has been inquired in the recent decades, are the body-specificity hypothesis and the polarity coding correspondence. According to the former, people associate positive entities with the dominant hand, or the space surrounding the dominant hand, and negative entities with the space surrounding the non-dominant hand. For the right-handers, they may have the association of good/right and bad/left. Therefore, the valence of the stimulus may have some influence on the spatial Simon effect when the stimulus presented to the left and right side of the screen. While, according to the latter, when the valence of stimulus and response are coded as the same polarity, participants can respond more quickly, and this promoting effect only exists for positive entities.
In the present study, three experiments were conducted to demonstrate the influence of emotional valence on spatial Simon effect under the vocal response conditions. Participants are all right-handers in these experiments. In experiment 1, the classic Simon paradigm variants were used and participants were also asked to carry on a standard Simon task under the vocal response conditions, in order to verify the existence of the spatial Simon effect. Similar to experiment 1, except the stimuli were changed to some brief strokes of facial emotional pictures, experiment 2 was to examine whether irrelevant emotional valence had some influence on the spatial Simon effect. The aim of experiment 3 was to explore whether the relevant emotional valence of stimuli had some influence on the spatial Simon effect. The dependent variables, across all the above experiments, are the response time and accuracy rate.
As a result, the experiment 1 confirmed the existence of spatial Simon effect under the vocal response condition, and in Experiment 2, the spatial Simon effect still emerged, which means that the effect was not influenced by the irrelevant emotional valence. In experiment 3, more informatively, the relevant emotional valence had certain influence on the spatial Simon effect, especially for positive items, the spatial Simon effect disappeared for positive items but still emerged significantly for the negative items. In order to further clarify the mechanism behind this influence and explicit the role of the association of good/right and bad/left and polarity coding correspondence, we conducted a combination analysis of 2 (space/valence mapping:mapping, un-mapping)×2 (emotional valence:positive, negative)×2 (correspondence:correspondence, non-correspondence), the result showed that, in the mapping group, the correspondence responses were significantly faster than the non-correspondence, while in un-mapping group, the spatial Simon effect reversed, i.e., the non-correspondence responses were significantly faster than the correspondences.
In conclusion, it can be concluded that the spatial Simon effect has not been disrupted by any different response ways; Emotional valence has some influence on spatial Simon effect when the emotional features are relevant to the response selections, which can be explained by the polarity-coding correspondence theory, and also partially in consistent with the body-specificity hypothesis.

Key words:spatial Simon effect,vocal response,emotional valence,polarity correspondence coding,body-specificity hypothesis

ReleaseDate:2017-08-31 10:09:55



Beilock, S. L., & Holt, L. E. (2007). Embodied preference judgments:Can likeability be driven by the motor system? Psychological Science, 18(1), 51 -57.

Casasanto, D. (2009). Embodiment of abstract concepts:Good and bad in right-and left-handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 138(3), 351-367, doi:10.1037/a0015854.

Casasanto, D., & Henetz, T. (2012). Handedness shapes children's abstract concepts. Cognitive Science, 36(2), 359-372, doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01199.x.

Cavallet, M., Chaim-Avancini, T. M., Biazoli, C. E., Jr., Bazán, P. R., da Silva, M. A., Cunha, P. J., … Gawryszewski, L. G. (2016). Influence of emotional stimulus valence on inhibitory control in adults with and without ADHD. Experimental Brain Research, 234(11), 3213-3223, doi:10.1007/s00221-016-4719-0.

Chajut, E., Schupak, A., & Algom, D. (2010). Emotional dilution of the Stroop effect:A new tool for assessing attention under emotion. Emotion, 10(6), 944-948.

Clark, H. H., & Brownell, H. H. (1975). Judging up and down. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 1(4), 339-352, doi:10.1037/0096-1523.1.4.339.

Conde, E. F. Q., Jazenko, F., Fraga Filho, R. S., da Costa, D. H., Torro-Alves, N., Cavallet, M., & Gawryszewski, L. G. (2011). Stimulus affective valence reverses spatial compatibility effect. Psychology & Neuroscience, 4(1), 81-87, doi:10.3922/j.psns.2011.1.010.

Conde, E. Q., Cavallet, M., Torro-Alves, N., Matsushima, E. H., Fraga-Filho, R. S., Jazenko, F., … Gawryszewski, L. G. (2014). Effects of affective valence on a mixed spatial correspondence task:A reply to Proctor (2013). Psychology & Neuroscience, 7(2), 83-90, doi:10.3922/j.psns.2014. 021.

Damjanovic, L., & Santiago, J. (2016). Contrasting vertical and horizontal representations of affect in emotional visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(1), 62-73, doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0884-6.

de la Vega, I., de Filippis, M., Lachmair, M., Dudschig, C., & Kaup, B. (2012). Emotional valence and physical space:limits of interaction. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 38(2), 375-385, doi:10.1037/a0024979.

de la Vega, I., Dudschig, C., De Filippis, M., Lachmair, M., & Kaup, B. (2013). Keep your hands crossed:The valence-by-left/right interaction is related to hand, not side, in an incongruent hand-response key assignment. Acta Psychologica, 142(2), 273-277, doi:10.1016/j.actpsy. 2012.12.011.

de la Fuente, J., Casasanto, D., Román, A., & Santiago, J. (2015). Can culture influence body-specific associations between space and valence? Cognitive Science, 39(4), 821-832, doi:10.1111/cogs.12177.

Làdavas, E. (1988). Asymmetries in processing horizontal and vertical dimensions. Memory & Cognition, 16(4), 377-382, doi:10.3758/bf03197049.

Lakens, D. (2011). High skies and oceans deep:Polarity benefits or mental simulation? Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 21, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00021.

Lakens, D. (2012). Polarity correspondence in metaphor correspondence effects:Structural overlap predicts categorization times for bipolar concepts presented in vertical space. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(3), 726-736, doi:10.1037/a0024955.

Lu, C. H., & Proctor, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance:A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2(2), 174-207, doi:10.3758/bf03210959.

Lynott, D., & Coventry, K. (2014). On the ups and downs of emotion:Testing between conceptual-metaphor and polarity accounts of emotional valence-spatial location interactions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(1), 218-226, doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0481-5.

Ma, Q. G., & Shang, Q. (2013). Modulation of emotion on Simon effect:An experimental study. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology, 19(2), 119-125.

[马庆国, 尚倩. (2013). 情绪对西蒙效应的调节作用. 应用心理学, 19(2), 119-125.]

Meier, B. P., & Robinson, M. D. (2004). Why the sunny side is up:Associations between affect and vertical position. Psychological Science, 15(4), 243-247, doi:10.1111/j. 0956-7976.2004.00659.x.

Milhau, A., Brouillet, T., & Brouillet, D. (2015). Valence-space compatibility effects depend on situated motor fluency in both right-and left-handers. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(5), 887-899, doi:10.1080/17470218.2014.967256.

Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness:The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97-113, doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4.

Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008). The secret life of fluency. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(6), 237-241, doi:10.1016/j.tics. 2008.02.014.

Ping, R. M., Dhillon, S., & Beilock, S. L. (2009). Reach for what you like:The body's role in shaping preferences. Emotion Review, 1(2), 140-150, doi:10.1177/1754073908-100439.

Proctor, R. W. (2013). Stimulus affect valence may influence mapping-rule selection but does not reverse the spatial compatibility effect:Reinterpretation of Conde et al. (2011). Psychology & Neuroscience, 6(1), 3-6, doi:10.3922/j. psns.2013.1.02.

Proctor, R. W., & Cho, Y. S. (2006). Polarity correspondence:A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3), 416-442, doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.416.

Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K. P. L. (2002). Mixing location-irrelevant and location-relevant trials:Influence of stimulus mode on spatial compatibility effects. Memory & Cognition, 30(2), 281-293, doi:10.3758/bf03195289.

Proctor, R. W., Yamaguchi, M., Zhang, Y. M., & Vu, K. P. L. (2009). Influence of visual stimulus mode on transfer of acquired spatial associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(2), 434-445.

Proctor, R. W., Zhang, Y. M., & Vu, K. P. L. (2013). Older and younger adults show comparable affective compatibility and Simon effects. Experimental Aging Research, 39(1), 44-69, doi:10.1080/0361073X.2013.742346.

Sommer, M., Hajak, G., Döhnel, K., Meinhardt, J., & Müller, J. L. (2008). Emotion-dependent modulation of interference processes:an fMRI study. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis, 68(2), 193-203.

Wühr, P. (2006). The Simon effect in vocal responses. Acta Psychologica, 121(2), 210-226, doi:10.1016/j.actpsy. 2004.12.003.

Wang, X. T., Du, F., He, X. S., & Zhang, K. (2014). Enhanced spatial stimulus-response mapping near the hands:The Simon effect is modulated by hand-stimulus proximity. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 40(6), 2252-2265, doi:10.1037/a0038140.

Zhang, Z. Y. (2013). Conflict processing is modulated by positive emotion:ERP data from a flanker task (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Suzhou University.

[张钟元. (2013). 大学生积极情绪与认知冲突的Flanker范式研究 (硕士学位论文). 苏州大学.]

Zhang, Y. M., & Proctor, R. W. (2008). Influence of intermixed emotion-relevant trials on the affective Simon effect. Experimental Psychology, 55(6), 409-416, doi:10.1027/1618-3169.55.6.409.