DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.01072

Acta Psychologica Sinica (心理学报) 2017/49:8 PP.1072-1079

The situational primacy of Chinese individual self, relational self, collective self:Evidence from ERP

Self has always been the hot topic in various fields. The tripartite model of self-construal has been the dominating theory at present. According to the tripartite model of self-construal, self is divided into individual self, relational self and collective self based on the relationship between self and others. As to the primacy of individual self, relational self and collective self, different scholars hold different opinions. They proposed four hypotheses as to this issue:individual self primacy hypothesis, relational self primacy hypothesis, collective self primacy hypothesis and situational primacy hypothesis. Each hypothesis has its own behavioral and neuroscience evidence. However, more and more evidence support the individual self primacy hypothesis recently.
The present study employed the variant of priming paradigm for the first time to explore the processing of Chinese individual self, relational self and collective self with ERP. We employed 3 (Reference Target:self, familiar other form same country, familiar other from other country)×3 (Reference Level:individual self, relational self, collective self) within-subject design. 19 paid volunteers participated in this study. Participants were asked to watch the center of the screen where would present a series of word pairs. The prime word and the target word are both names which were collected by the pilot questionnaire. Each trial consisted of the following sequence of events. A prime word was presented for 1000~1200 ms randomized, followed by a 250~350 ms randomized fixation cross, after which a blank screen came for 250~350 ms randomized. After that, a target word came about and lasted until the participants responded. If there was no response, then the target word would disappear after 2000 ms. The inter-trial interval (ITI) was 1000 ms long. There are 1000 trials in total, and participants could have a break after 200 trials. The participants were asked to indicate whether the prime and the target referred to the same person, whether they belonged to the same family, or whether they were from the same country. If the answer was yes, then press the "Consistent" key, otherwise press the "Inconsistent" key.
Behavioral results showed that RT of individual self was significantly shorter than that of relational self and collective self and RT of relational self was significantly shorter than that of collective self when the reference target was self. ERPs results indicated that which self became the primary one depended on the specific processing stage. In the early (P2) stage, collective self became the primary one. In the late (P3) stage, individual self turned to be the primary one. In terms of N2, there was no difference as to primacy among them. The results support the situational primacy hypothesis.
The present study expands the studies of tripartite model of self-construal and provides the cognitive neuroscience evidence for the debate of primacy. Future studies should be done from different perspective to support situational primacy hypothesis.

Key words:self,tripartite model of self-construal,individual self,relational self,collective self

ReleaseDate:2017-08-31 10:09:56

Cai, H. J., Sedikides, C., & Jiang, L. X. (2013). Familial self as a potent source of affirmation:Evidence from China. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(5), 529-537.

Campanella, S., Gaspard, C., Debatisse, D., Bruyer, R., Crommelinck, M., & Guerit, J. M. (2002). Discrimination of emotional facial expressions in a visual oddball task:An ERP study. Biological Psychology, 59(3), 171-186.

Carretié, L., Mercado, F., Tapia, M., & Hinojosa, J. A. (2001). Emotion, attention, and the ‘negativity bias’, studied through event-related potentials. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 41(1), 75-85.

Chen, J., Yuan, J. J., Feng, T. Y., Chen, A. T., Gu, B. B., & Li, H. (2011). Temporal features of the degree effect in self-relevance:Neural correlates. Biological Psychology, 87(2), 290-295.

Chen, J., Zhang, Y. X., Zhong, J., Hu, L., & Li, H. (2013). The primacy of the individual versus the collective self:Evidence from an event-related potential study. Neuroscience Letters, 535, 30-34.

Chiao, J. Y., Harada, T., Komeda, H., Li, Z., Mano, Y., Saito, D., Iidaka, T. (2009). Neural basis of individualistic and collectivistic views of self. Human Brain Mapping, 30(9), 2813-2820.

Compton, R. J. (2003). The interface between emotion and attention:A review of evidence from psychology and neuroscience. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 2(2), 115-129.

Cross, S. E., Hardin, E. E., & Gercek-Swing, B. (2011). The what, how, why, and where of self-construal. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(2), 142-179.

Dehaene, S., & Changeux, J. P. (2011). Experimental and theoretical approaches to conscious processing. Neuron, 70(2), 200-227.

Eisenberger, N. I., Lieberman, M. D., & Williams, K. D. (2003). Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science, 302(5643), 290-292.

Fan, W., Chen, J., Wang, X. Y., Cai, R. H., Tan, Q. B., Chen, Y., Zhong, Y. P. (2013). Electrophysiological correlation of the degree of self-reference effect. PLoS One, 8(12), e80289.

Fan, W., Zhang, Y. X., Wang, X., Wang, X. Y., Zhang, X. Y., & Zhong, Y. P. (2011). The temporal features of self-referential processing evoked by national flag. Neuroscience Letters, 505(3), 233-237.

Folstein, J. R., & van Petten, C. (2008). Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP:A review. Psychophysiology, 45(1), 152-170.

Gaertner, L., Sedikides, C., Luke, M., O'Mara, E. M., Iuzzini, J., Jackson, L. E., &Wu, Q. P. (2012). A motivational hierarchy within:Primacy of the individual self, relational self, or collective self? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(5), 997-1013.

Gaertner, L., Sedikides, C., Vevea, J. L., & Iuzzini, J. (2002). The" I," the" we," and the" when":A meta-analysis of motivational primacy in self-definition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(3), 574-591.

Gray, H. M., Ambady, N., Lowenthal, W. T., & Deldin, P. (2004). P300 as an index of attention to self-relevant stimuli. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(2), 216-224.

Johnson, C., Gadon, O., Carlson, D., Southwick, S., Faith, M., & Chalfin, J. (2002). Self-reference and group membership:Evidence for a group-reference effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32(2), 261-274.

Leary, M. R., & Tangney, J. P. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of self and identity (2nd ed.). New York, NY:Guilford Press.

Miyakoshi, M., Nomura, M., & Ohira, H. (2007). An ERP study on self-relevant object recognition. Brain and Cognition, 63(2), 182-189.

Müller, H. M., & Kutas, M. (1996). What's in a name? Electrophysiological differences between spoken nouns, proper names and one's own name. NeuroReport, 8(1), 221-225.

Onorato, R. S., & Turner, J. C. (2004). Fluidity in the self-concept:The shift from personal to social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34(3), 257-278.

Reis, H. T. (2008). Reinvigorating the concept of situation in social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(4), 311-329.

Sedikides, C., Campbell, W. K., Reeder, G. D., & Elliot, A. J. (2002). The self in relationships:Whether, how, and when close others put the self "in its place". European Review of Social Psychology, 12(1), 237-265.

Sedikides, C., Gaertner, L., Luke, M. A., O'Mara, E. M., & Gebauer, J. E. (2013). A three-tier hierarchy of self-potency:Individual self, relational self, collective self. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 235-295.

Sedikides, C., & Brewer, M. B. (2001). Individual self, relational self, collective self. New York:Psychology Press.

Smith, E. R., & Semin, G. R. (2007). Situated social cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(3), 132-135.

Tacikowski, P., & Nowicka, A. (2010). Allocation of attention to self-name and self-face:An ERP study. Biological Psychology, 84(2), 318-324.

Thorpe, S., Fize, D., & Marlot, C. (1996). Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature, 381(6582), 520-522.

Wang, G., Mao, L. H., Ma, Y., Yang, X. D., Cao, J. Q., Liu, X., & Han, S. H. (2012). Neural representations of close others in collectivistic brains. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(2), 222-229.

Yang, X. (2012). The relational self-reference effect and its brain mechanism (Unpublished master's thesis). Hunan Normal University. Changsha.

[杨孝. (2012). 关系自我参照效应及其脑机制的研究 (硕士学位论文). 湖南师范大学, 长沙.]

Zhang, L., Zhou, T. G., Zhang, J., Liu, Z. X., Fan, J., & Zhu, Y. (2006). In search of the Chinese self:An fMRI study. Science in China Series C, 49(1), 89-96.

Zhao, K., Yuan, J. J., Zhong, Y. P., Peng, Y. S., Chen, J., Zhou, L. P., & Ding, D. Q. (2009). Event-related potential correlates of the collective self-relevant effect. Neuroscience Letters, 464(1), 57-61.

Zhu, Y., Zhang, L., Fan, J., & Han, S. H. (2007). Neural basis of cultural influence on self-representation. NeuroImage, 34(3), 1310-1316.