doi:

DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.01113

Acta Psychologica Sinica (心理学报) 2017/49:8 PP.1113-1124

Consumer self-construal, need of uniqueness and preference of brand logo shape


Abstract:
There are a variety of brand logos in the market and it has become a marketing way to attract consumers. However, how to design a reasonable and effective brand logo and what kind of brand logos is preferred by the target consumers, are questions for marketers and researchers. Based on the horizontal dimension of Individualism-Collectivism Framework by Triandis and Gelfand (1998), this research found the mechanism between consumer self-construct and preference of brand logo shape:need for uniqueness. Findings from four experiments demonstrated that consumers with independent (vs. interdependent) self-construal had a higher (vs. lower) need for uniqueness and preferred angle-(vs. rounded-) shaped brand logos. Consumers' need for uniqueness played a mediation role in the relationship of self-construal and preference of brand logo shape, and that product type (private products vs. public products) played a moderation role in this relationship.
We conducted four experiments to examine our hypotheses. The data of study 1 was collected from 63 undergraduates who were activated either an independent or interdependent self-construal, following which both groups responded to questionnaire items on the manipulation check of self-construal and Need for Uniqueness Scale. At last, they were showed two brand logos:an angle and a rounded one, and then gave their preference to these two logos. Study 2 investigated the boundary effect of product type (private products vs. public products). Study 3 manipulated self-construal in another different method by asking participants to describe the differences or similarities between themselves and their family or friends, and changed product categories to further test our hypotheses. The data in study 2 and 3 were collected from 129 undergraduates and 156 consumers through online survey. In study 4, we adopted the brand logo shape in the graphic form, different from the brand logo shape in the text form from Study 1 to 3, and thus expanded the application of this study. All four experiments showed that individuals of independent (vs. interdependent) self-construct had a higher (vs. lower) need for uniqueness, and preferred angled (vs. rounded) brand logo only when consuming public products (vs. private products).
This research has theoretical contributions in four aspects. First, this study proved that "need for uniqueness" played a mediation role in the relationship of self-concept and brand logo shape preference. This is a significant advancement of the previous research, which found "conflict resolution style" as a mediator. Second, this study have theoretical impetus on the relationship of self-construal and need for uniqueness. Unlike the existing research, which either adopted only one method to prime self-construal or measured it using continuous variable, our present research adopted two methods to prime self-construal and the results got replicated perfectly. Third, this study enriched the researches about brand logo shape (angle or rounded). Totally, this research adopted two forms to represent the shape of brand logo, graphic and text. Fourth, this study advanced sensory marketing (especially visual marketing) researches. Moreover, it provides rich strategic implications for marketers and firms in designing and adjusting brand logos, and also developing corresponding marketing strategies.

Key words:self-construal,need for uniqueness,brand logo shape,individualism-collectivism,product category

ReleaseDate:2017-08-31 10:09:57



Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this "we"? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 83-93.

Cheema, A., & Kaikati, A. M. (2010). The effect of need for uniqueness on word of mouth. Journal of Marketing Research, 47, 553-563.

Cian, L., Krishna, A., & Elder, R. S. (2014). This logo moves me:Dynamic imagery from static images. Journal of Marketing Research, 51, 184-197.

Gürhan-Canli, Z., & Maheswaran, D. (2000). Cultural variations in country of origin effects. Journal of Marketing Research, 37, 309-317.

Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis:A regression-based approach. New York:Guilford Press.

Hong, J. W., & Chang, H. H. (2015). "I" follow my heart and "we" rely on reasons:The impact of self-construal on reliance on feelings versus reasons in decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 41, 1392-1411.

Jiang, Y. W., Gorn, G. J., Galli, M., & Chattopadhyay, A. (2016). Does your company have the right logo? How and why circular-and angular-logo shapes influence brand attribute judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 42, 709-726.

Keller, K. L. (2013). Strategic brand management:Building, measuring, and managing brand equity (4th ed.). New Jersy:Prentice Hall.

Kotler, P. T, & Keller, K. L. (2015). Marketing Management (15th ed). New Jersey:Pearson Education.

Krishna, A. (2012). An integrative review of sensory marketing:Engaging the senses to affect perception, judgment and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22, 332-351.

Liu, W. M., Wang, H. Z., & Wang, J. Y. (2014). Sense of touch in the domain of consumer behavior:Review, application and prospects. Foreign Economies and Management, 36(4), 25-35.

[柳武妹, 王海忠, 王静一. (2014). 消费行为领域的触觉研究:回顾、应用与展望. 外国经济与管理, 36(4), 25-35.]

Mandel, N. (2003). Shifting selves and decision making:The effects of self-construal priming on consumer risk-taking. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 30-40.

Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self:Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.

Morris, M. W., Williams, K. Y., Leung, K., Larrick, R., Mendoza, M. T., Bhatnagar, D., … Hu, J.-C. (1998). Conflict management style:Accounting for cross-national differences. Journal of International Business Studies, 29, 729-747.

Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K. P., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought:Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108, 291-310.

Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses:Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185-227.

Ratner, R. K., & Kahn, B. E. (2002). The impact of private versus public consumption on variety-seeking behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 246-257.

Ruvio, A., Shoham, A., & Brenčič, M. M. (2008). Consumers' need for uniqueness:Short-form scale development and cross-cultural validation. International Marketing Review, 25, 33-53.

Schumpe, B. M., Herzberg, P. Y., & Erb, H. P. (2016). Assessing the need for uniqueness:Validation of the german nfu-g scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 231-237.

Simonson, I., & Nowlis, S. M. (2000). The role of explanations and need for uniqueness in consumer decision making:unconventional choices based on reasons. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 49-68.

Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 580-591.

Song, D., & Lee, J. (2013). Balancing "We" and "I":Self-construal and an alternative approach to seeking uniqueness. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 12, 506-516.

Stapel, D. A., & Koomen, W. (2001). I, we, and the effects of others on me:How self-construal level moderates social comparison effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 766-781.

Tian, K. T., Bearden, W. O., & Hunter, G. L. (2001). Consumers' need for uniqueness:Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 50-66.

Ting-Toomey, S., Oetzel, J. G., & Yee-Jung, K. (2001). Self-construal types and conflict management styles. Communication Reports, 14, 87-104.

Trafimow, D., Triandis, H. C., & Goto, S. G. (1991). Some tests of the distinction between the private self and the collective self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 649-655.

Treisman A. (1986). Properties, parts, and objects. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance. New York:Wiley.

Triandis, H. C., & Gelfand, M. J. (1998). Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 118-128.

Zhang, Y. L., Feick, L., & Price, L. J. (2006). The impact of self-construal on aesthetic preference for angular versus rounded shapes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 794-805.

Zhong, K., & Wang, H. Z. (2015). Brand elongation effect:The impact of logo shape on estimation to products' time-related attributes and brand evaluation. Nankai Business Review, 18(1), 64-76.

[钟科, 王海忠. (2015). 品牌拉伸效应:标识形状对产品时间属性评估和品牌评价的影响. 南开管理评论, 18(1), 64-76.]

Zhong, K., Wang, H. Z., & Yang, C. (2014). Sensory marketing strategy in service failure:An empirical study of the positive effect of the haptic experience on consumer attitude. China Industrial Economy, (1), 114-126.

[钟科, 王海忠, 杨晨. (2014). 感官营销战略在服务失败中的运用:触觉体验缓解顾客抱怨的实证研究. 中国工业经济, (1), 114-126.]

Zhong, K., Wang, H. Z., & Yang, C. (2016). Sensory marketing:A literature review and prospects. Foreign Economies and Management, 38(5), 69-85.

[钟科, 王海忠, 杨晨. (2016). 感官营销研究综述与展望. 外国经济与管理, 38(5), 69-85.]

Zhu, R., & Argo, J. J. (2013). Exploring the impact of various shaped seating arrangements on persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 40, 336-349.