doi:

DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.01219

Acta Psychologica Sinica (心理学报) 2017/49:9 PP.1219-1233

The mechanism and effect of leader humility:An interpersonal relationship perspective


Abstract:
Humility is a traditional virtue in China, however, the effectiveness of humility has been questioned in modern society. For example, by expressing humility, one's strength and contribution may not be recognized by others. Although the traditional view requires us to show humility, however, the modern view indicates that if someone expresses humility, he/she may not get deserved reputation. Meanwhile, sometimes followers may regard leaders' humbleness as weakness because followers need powerful leaders to guide them. The paradox of traditional and modern views of humility raises leaders' concern about whether and how to display humility in workplace. Based on interpersonal relationship perspective, this research aims to examine the effect of leader humility on employee organizational citizenship behavior, as well as the role of inferred leader humility motives during this process. Instead of focusing on the formal relationship between leader and follower, we proposed that humble leaders would be more attractive to followers and would be easier to form a good interpersonal relationship with followers. Meanwhile, we proposed that when followers inferred different motives of leader-expressed humility, the positive relationship between leader humility and relational closeness would be weakened or strengthened.
In order to test our hypothesized model, we conducted a time-lagged leader-member matching questionnaire design. Our sample came from 13 big companies located in Wuhan or Xiangyang, which resulted in 295 leader-followers dyads. To reducing common method bias, leader humility, inferred leader humility motives and demographic variables was measured in time 1. 7 weeks later, we measured relational closeness and LMX from followers and we measured voice behavior and helping behavior from leaders. Because leader humility was embedded in teams, we used hierarchical linear regression to analysis the data. Meanwhile, to test the indirect effect of relational closeness in relationship between leader humility and employee organizational citizenship behavior, bootstrapping method was also adopted.
Results showed that:(1) after controlling leader-member exchange, leader humility was positively related to relational closeness. (2) Leader humility could enhance followers' voice and helping behavior. (3) Relational closeness mediated the relationship between leader humility and followers' voice and helping behavior. (4) When follower inferred leader humility's impression management motive was high, the positive relationship between leader humility and relational closeness would be weakened. However, the moderation effect of follower inferred leader humility performance enhancement motives on relationship between leader humility and relational closeness was not significant.
The present research makes several contributions to leader humility literature. By examining the positive effect of leader humility on follower OCB, this research proves the effectiveness of leader humility further. Moreover, this study confirmed the mediating role of relational closeness as well as its boundary conditions. As to the practical implications, this research suggested that leaders could show more humility in workplace to trigger followers to do more organizational citizenship behavior. However, at the same time, leaders should realize that if their humility was motivated by impression management, the positive effect of leader humility would be weakened.

Key words:leader humility,relational closeness,voice,helping behavior,inferred motives of leader humility

ReleaseDate:2017-10-20 02:10:46



Ainsworth, M. S., & Bowlby, J. (1991). An ethological approach to personality development. American Psychologist, 46(4), 333-341.

Anderson, N. H. (1968). Likableness ratings of 555 personality-trait words. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(3), 272-279.

Arnold, E. C., & Boggs, K. U. (2015). Interpersonal relationships:Professional communication skills for nurses (7th ed.). London:Elsevier Health Sciences.

Aron, A., & Aron, E. N. (1997). Self-expansion motivation and including other in the self. In S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships:Theory, research and interventions (2nd ed., pp. 251-270). London:Wiley.

Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Li, N. (2013). The theory of purposeful work behavior:The role of personality, higher-order goals, and job characteristics. Academy of Management Review, 38(1), 132-153.

Bauer, T. N., & Green, S. G. (1996). Development of leader-member exchange:A longitudinal test. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1538-1567.

Bolino, M. C., Hsiung, H. H., Harvey, J., & LePine, J. A. (2015). "Well, I'm tired of tryin'!" Organizational citizenship behavior and citizenship fatigue. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(1), 56-74.

Bond, M. H., Leung, K., & Wan, K. C. (1982). The social impact of self-effacing attributions:The Chinese case. The Journal of Social Psychology, 118(2), 157-166.

Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (2014). Organizational citizenship behavior and contextual performance:A special Issue of human performance. Oxford:Psychology Press.

Chen, R. (1993). Responding to compliments a contrastive study of politeness strategies between American English and Chinese speakers. Journal of Pragmatics, 20(1):49-75.

Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (1993). The difference between communal and exchange relationships:What it is and is not. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19(6), 684-691.

Ensari, N., & Murphy, S. E. (2003). Cross-cultural variations in leadership perceptions and attribution of charisma to the leader. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 92(1-2), 52-66.

Eastwick, P. W., Luchies, L. B., Finkel, E. J., & Hunt, L. L. (2014). The predictive validity of ideal partner preferences:A review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(3), 623-665.

Erdogan, B., Bauer, T. N., & Walter, J. (2015). Deeds that help and words that hurt:Helping and gossip as moderators of the relationship between leader-member exchange and advice network centrality. Personnel Psychology, 68(1), 185-214.

Exline, J. J., Baumeister, R. F., Bushman, B. J., Campbell, W. K., & Finkel, E. J. (2004). Too proud to let go:narcissistic entitlement as a barrier to forgiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(6), 894-912.

Farh, J. L., & Cheng, B. S. (2000). A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations. In J. T. Li, A. S. Tsui, & E. Weldon (Eds.), Management and organizations in the Chinese context (pp. 84-127). London, UK:Palgrave Macmillan.

Farmer, S. M., Van Dyne, L., & Kamdar, D. (2015). The contextualized self:How team-member exchange leads to coworker identification and helping OCB. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(2), 583-595.

Goktepe, J. R., & Schneier, C. E. (1989). Role of sex, gender roles, and attraction in predicting emergent leaders. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(1), 165-167.

Graham, J. M., & Harf, M. R. (2015). Self-expansion and flow:The roles of challenge, skill, affect, and activation. Personal Relationships, 22(1), 45-64.

Gu, Y. G. (1990). Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(2), 237-257.

Hofmann, D. A. (1997). An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models. Journal of Management, 23(6), 723-744.

Hu, J. S. (2007). Self-modesty in the traditional and modern vision. Psychological Exploration, 27(3), 19-21, 43.[胡金生. (2007). 传统和现代视野中的自谦. 心理学探新, 27(3), 19-21, 43.]

Hu, J. S., & Huang, X. T. (2006). A research on self-modesty in Chinese society. Psychological Science, 29(6), 1392-1395.[胡金生, 黄希庭. (2006). 华人社会中的自谦初探. 心理科学, 29(6), 1392-1395.]

Hu, J. S., & Huang, X. T. (2009). Preliminary study on self-modesty:One significant behavioral style of Chinese. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 41(9), 842-852.[胡金生, 黄希庭. (2009). 自谦:中国人一种重要的行事风格初探. 心理学报, 41(9), 842-852.]

Huston, T. L. (2013). Foundations of interpersonal attraction. New York:Elsevier.

James, L. R. (1982). Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(2), 219-229.

Kim, Y. J., Van Dyne, L., Kamdar, D., & Johnson, R. E. (2013). Why and when do motives matter? An integrative model of motives, role cognitions, and social support as predictors of OCB. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 121(2), 231-245.

Lam, W., Huang, X., & Snape, E. (2007). Feedback-seeking behavior and leader-member exchange:Do supervisor-attributed motives matter? Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 348-363.

Lei, X. H., Shan, Z. W., Su, T. Y., & Yang, Y. F. (2015). Impacts of humble leadership behavior on employee creativity. Journal of Management Science, 28(2), 115-125.[雷星晖, 单志汶, 苏涛永, 杨元飞. (2015). 谦卑型领导行为对员工创造力的影响研究. 管理科学, 28(2), 115-125.]

Luo, S. H., & Snider, A. G. (2009). Accuracy and biases in newlyweds' perceptions of each other:Not mutually exclusive but mutually beneficial. Psychological Science, 20(11), 1332-1339.

Malouff, J. M., Schutte, N. S., & Thorsteinsson, E. B. (2014). Trait emotional intelligence and romantic relationship satisfaction:A meta-analysis. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 42(1), 53-66.

Mao, J. H., Liao, J. Q., & Liu W. X. (2016). A review and comparison of humility studies between the West and China. Management Review, 28(3), 154-163.[毛江华, 廖建桥, 刘文兴. (2016). 中西方谦逊的研究回顾和比较分析. 管理评论, 28(3), 154-163.]

Maxwell, H., Tasca, G. A., Gick, M., Ritchie, K., Balfour, L., & Bissada, H. (2012). The impact of attachment anxiety on interpersonal complementarity in early group therapy interactions among women with binge eating disorder. Group Dynamics:Theory, Research, and Practice, 16(4), 255-271.

McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24-59.

Meindl, J. R., Ehrlich, S. B., & Dukerich, J. M. (1985). The romance of leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30(1), 78-102.

Mills, J., & Clark, M. S. (1982). Exchange and communal relationships. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 121-144.

Nielsen, R., Marrone, J. A., & Ferraro, H. S. (2013). Leading with humility. London:Routledge.

Nielsen, R., Marrone, J. A., & Slay, H. S. (2010). A new look at humility:Exploring the humility concept and its role in socialized charismatic leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 17(1), 33-43.

Oc, B., Bashshur, M. R., Daniels, M. A., Greguras, G. J., & Diefendorff, J. M. (2015). Leader humility in Singapore. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(1), 68-80.

Ou, A. Y., Tsui, A. S., Kinicki, A. J., Waldman, D. A., Xiao, Z. X., & Song, L. J. (2014). Humble chief executive officers' connections to top management team integration and middle managers' responses. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59(1), 34-72.

Owens, B. P., & Hekman, D. R. (2012). Modeling how to grow:An inductive examination of humble leader behaviors, contingencies, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 787-818.

Owens, B. P., & Hekman, D. R. (2016). How does leader humility influence team performance? Exploring the mechanisms of contagion and collective promotion focus. Academy of Management Journal, 59(3), 1088-1111.

Owens, B. P., Johnson, M. D., & Mitchell, T. R. (2013). Expressed humility in organizations:Implications for performance, teams, and leadership. Organization Science, 24(5), 1517-1538.

Owens, B. P., Walker, A. S., & Waldman, D. A. (2015). Leader narcissism and follower outcomes:The counterbalancing effect of leader humility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(4), 1203-1213.

Piccolo, R. F., & Colquitt, J. A. (2006). Transformational leadership and job behaviors:The mediating role of core job characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 327-340.

Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 717-731.

Qu, Q., He Z. C., & Mei, Z. Q. (2013). An empirical study on the impact of leader humility on leadership effectiveness and employees' organizational identification. China Soft Science, (7), 101-109.[曲庆, 何志婵, 梅哲群. (2013). 谦卑领导行为对领导有效性和员工组织认同影响的实证研究. 中国软科学, (7), 101-109.]

Rafferty, A. E., & Griffin, M. A. (2006). Refining individualized consideration:Distinguishing developmental leadership and supportive leadership. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79(1), 37-61.

Rockstuhl, T., Dulebohn, J. H., Ang, S., & Shore, L. M. (2012). Leader-member exchange (LMX) and culture:A meta-analysis of correlates of LMX across 23 countries. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(6), 1097-1130.

Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(4), 296-320.

Scandura, T. A., & Graen, G. B. (1984). Moderating effects of initial leader-member exchange status on the effects of a leadership intervention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(3), 428-436.

Schaubroeck, J., & Lam, S. S. K. (2002). How similarity to peers and supervisor influences organizational advancement in different cultures. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1120-1136.

Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior:Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(4), 653-663.

Tang, H. Y., Long, L. R., & Zhou, R. Y. (2015). Humble leadership behavior and subordinates' work engagement:A mediated moderation model. Journal of Management Science, 28(3), 77-89.[唐汉瑛, 龙立荣, 周如意. (2015). 谦卑领导行为与下属工作投入:有中介的调节模型. 管理科学, 28(3), 77-89.]

Tangney, J. P. (2000). Humility:Theoretical perspectives, empirical findings and directions for future research. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19(1), 70-82.

Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors:Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 108-119.

Vangelisti, A. L., & Caughlin, J. P. (1997). Revealing family secrets:The influence of topic, function, and relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14(5), 679-705.

Vera, D., & Rodriguez-Lopez, A. (2004). Strategic virtues:Humility as a source of competitive advantage. Organizational Dynamics, 33(4), 393-408.

Weick, K. E. (2001). Leadership as the legitimation of doubt. In W. Bennis, G. M. Spreitzer, & T. G. Cummings (Eds.), The future of leadership:Today's top leadership thinkers speak to tomorrow's leaders. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.

Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601-617.

Wrzus, C., Hänel, M., Wagner, J., & Neyer, F. J. (2013). Social network changes and life events across the life span:A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 139(1), 53-80.

Xu, E., Huang, X., & Robinson, S. L. (2015). When self-view is at stake:Responses to ostracism through the lens of self-verification theory. Journal of Management, doi:10.1177/0149206314567779. (in Press)

Zhang, X. M., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity:The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 107-128.

Zhang, Y., & Chen, C. C. (2013). Developmental leadership and organizational citizenship behavior:Mediating effects of self-determination, supervisor identification, and organizational identification. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(4), 534-543.

Zhang, Y., Huai, M. Y., & Xie, Y. H. (2015). Paternalistic leadership and employee voice in China:A dual process model. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(1), 25-36.