doi:

DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.01247

Acta Psychologica Sinica (心理学报) 2017/49:10 PP.1247-1255

Perceiving better, inhibiting better:Effects of perceptual precision on distractor-inhibition processes during working memory


Abstract:
Working memory (WM) is the memory system to store and process information shortly for the goal-directed behavior. The resource of WM is extremely limited. It is necessary to selectively maintain relevant information and inhibit interference from distracting information. Previous studies have found that individuals with high WM capacity would be able to suppress interference more efficiently. However, it's still unknown whether the precision of WM representation will be influenced by distractors in a similar way as WM capacity. Perceptual representation as the first stage of information processing, its precision will highly influence the quality of information stored in WM. Here, we adopted an independent perceptual task and a variant version of color recall task to examine (1) the effect of interference on WM capacity as well as precision and (2) whether the precision of perceptual representation would influence the ability to inhibit interference during WM processing.
Fifty-three undergraduate students participated in the experiment. In the first perceptual task, participants reported the color of a cued item while the item remained presented until a response was made. Afterwards, color recall tasks were operated including a ‘distractor-present’ and a ‘distractor-absent’ condition. Each condition contained three levels of WM load:low (2 targets), medium (4 targets) and high (6 targets). In ‘distractor-present’ condition, target items were presented along with two more distracting colored stimuli with a different shape. Participants were asked to remember only the color of the target items and report the remembered color of a cued item by clicking on a color wheel. From the distribution of errors between the reported color value and the original color value, we could obtain measures for both capacity and precision via standard mixture model used by Zhang and Luck, 2008.
To explore the effects of distractor on WM capacity and precision and whether these influence will vary with WM load, repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed on WM capacity and precision. For WM capacity, main effects of distractors, WM load and their interaction were significant. WM capacity decreased with increasing WM load. And WM capacity in ‘distractor-absent’ condition was significantly higher than performance in ‘distractor-present’ condition. Interaction of distractor and WM load mainly reflected that distractors decreased WM capacity under the medium and high loads. For WM precision, main effect of load was significant and distractor affected precision on low load condition. When all participants were divided into two groups according to their performance in the perceptual task, the distractor effect only existed in the group with lower perceptual precision. Pearson correlation analysis further revealed that perceptual precision could predict the ability to inhibit distractors, in either WM capacity or precision. The quality of the perceptual representation in the lower group negatively correlated with the distractor effect in WM capacity while the perceptual precision in the higher group negatively correlated with the distractor effect for WM precision.
The present study has shown that interference influenced the quantity and quality of WM representations differently under certain WM load. And individuals with lower perceptual quality would be more susceptible to interference. These findings imply that the performance and the ability to suppress distraction during WM may be enhanced via training of perceptual precision.

Key words:visual perception,working memory,representation precision,selective attention

ReleaseDate:2017-11-17 09:47:11



Alvarez, G. A., & Cavanagh, P. (2004). The capacity of visual short-term memory is set both by visual information load and by number of objects. Psychological Science, 15, 106-111.

Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory:Theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 1-29.

Bays, P. M., Catalao, R. F. G., & Husain, M. (2009). The precision of visual working memory is set by allocation of a shared resource. Journal of Vision, 9, 7.1-7.11.

Bays, P. M., Gorgoraptis, N., Wee, N., Marshall, L., & Husain, M. (2011). Temporal dynamics of encoding, storage, and reallocation of visual working memory. Journal of Vision, 11, 1-15.

Bays, P. M., & Husain, M. (2008). Dynamic shifts of limited working memory resources in human vision. Science, 321, 851-854.

Benjamini, Y., & Yekutieli, D. (2001). The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. The Annals of Statistics, 29, 1165-1188.

Cowan, N. (2000). The magical number 4 in short-term memory:A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 87-185.

Cowan, N. (2014). Working memory underpins cognitive development, learning, and education. Educational Psychology Review, 26, 197-223.

Fitousi, D., & Wenger, M. J. (2011). Processing capacity under perceptual and cognitive load:A closer look at load theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 37, 781-798.

Fougnie, D., Asplund, C. L., & Marois, R. (2010). What are the units of storage in visual working memory? Journal of Vision, 10, 27.

Fougnie, D., Suchow, J. W., & Alvarez, G. A. (2012). Variability in the quality of visual working memory. Nature Communications, 3, 1229.

Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2004). The reading span test and its predictive power for reading comprehension ability. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 136-158.

Fukuda, K., & Vogel, E. K. (2009). Human variation in overriding attentional capture. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 8726-8733.

Hahn, B., Robinson, B. M., Kaiser, S. T., Harvey, A. N., Beck, V. M., Leonard, C. J., … Gold, J. M. (2010). Failure of schizophrenia patients to overcome salient distractors during working memory encoding. Biological Psychiatry, 68, 603-609.

Johnson, M. K., McMahon, R. P., Robinson, B. M., Harvey, A. N., Hahn, B., Leonard, C. J., … Gold, J. M. (2013). The relationship between working memory capacity and broad measures of cognitive ability in healthy adults and people with schizophrenia. Neuropsychology, 27, 220-229.

Jost, K., Bryck, R. L., Vogel, E. K., & Mayr, U. (2011). Are old adults just like low working memory young adults? Filtering efficiency and age differences in visual working memory. Cerebral Cortex, 21, 1147-1154.

Koshino, H., & Olid, P. (2016). Interactions between modality of working memory load and perceptual load in distractor processing. The Journal of General Psychology, 142, 135-149.

Kozbelt, A. (2001). Artists as experts in visual cognition. Visual Cognition, 8, 705-723.

Lavie, N., Hirst, A., de Fockert, J. W., & Viding, E. (2004). Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 133, 339-354.

Leonard, C. J., Kaiser, S. T., Robinson, B. M., Kappenman, E. S., Hahn, B., Gold, J. M., & Luck, S. J. (2013). Toward the neural mechanisms of reduced working memory capacity in schizophrenia. Cerebral Cortex, 23, 1582-1592.

Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279-281.

Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (2013). Visual working memory capacity:From psychophysics and neurobiology to individual differences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 391-400.

Ma, W. J., Husain, M., & Bays, P. M. (2014). Changing concepts of working memory. Nature Neuroscience, 17, 347-356.

Rosenblatt, E., & Winner, E. (1988). Is superior visual memory a component of superior drawing ability?. In L. K. Obler & D. Fein (Eds.), The exceptional brain:Neuropsychology of talent and special abilities (pp. 341-363). New York, NY, US:Guilford Press.

Suchow, J. W., Brady, T. F., Fougnie, D., & Alvarez, G. A. (2013). Modeling visual working memory with the MemToolbox. Journal of Vision, 13, 9.

Tourva, A., Spanoudis, G., & Demetriou, A. (2016). Cognitive correlates of developing intelligence:The contribution of working memory, processing speed and attention. Intelligence, 54, 136-146.

van den Berg, R., Awh, E., & Ma, W. J. (2014). Factorial comparison of working memory models. Psychological Review, 121, 124-149.

Vogel, E. K., McCollough, A. W., & Machizawa, M. G. (2005). Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory. Nature, 438, 500-503.

Weil, R. S., Wykes, V., Carmel, D., & Rees, G. (2012). Opposite effects of perceptual and working memory load on perceptual filling-in of an artificial scotoma. Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 36-44.

Winner, E., & Casey, M. B. (1992). Cognitive profiles of artists. In G. C. Cupchik & J. László (Eds.), Emerging visions of the aesthetic process:Psychology, semiology, and philosophy (pp. 154-170). New York, NY, US:Cambridge University Press.

Xu, Y. D., & Chun, M. M. (2006). Dissociable neural mechanisms supporting visual short-term memory for objects. Nature, 440, 91-95.

Zhang, W. W., & Luck, S. J. (2008). Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory. Nature, 453, 233-235.

Zhang, W. W., & Luck, S. J. (2011). The number and quality of representations in working memory. Psychological Science, 22, 1434-1441.