DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.01334

Acta Psychologica Sinica (心理学报) 2017/49:10 PP.1334-1343

The effect of altruism on social discounting of environmental gain and loss

After decades of rapid economic growth, societies around the world are facing severe challenges with environmental pollution. In some developing countries, environmental issues are threatening their sustainable development and people's health. In economic and psychological literatures, environmental problems are usually recognized as social dilemmas because natural resources are public goods, which imply conflicts between individual and collective benefits. Empirical studies found that social distance had an effect on cooperative behavior in social dilemmas. Meanwhile, the phenomenon of social discounting on monetary outcomes was also revealed by many studies. However, the impact of social distance on environmental decisions remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to explore the phenomenon of social discounting of environmental outcomes, fit the behavioral data of social discounting, and investigate the effect of altruism on social discounting under gain and loss frames.
The experiment was designed as a 4 (social distance level:a family member, friend, mere acquaintance, and stranger)×2 (task frame:environmental gain, environmental loss) study in which social distance was manipulated within the subject, but task frames were assigned between subjects. The choice titration procedure was used to measure the social discounting rate of environmental outcomes. Participants were asked to make a series of choices between "I live in high (or poor in environmental loss frame) quality air for X days" and "Another person (in different social distances) lives in high (or poor) quality air for 110 days." The value of "X" in the choice series varied from 10 days to 100 days with an interval of 10 days. In addition, participants' altruism was measured by the Self-report Altruism Scale.
The results showed that:(1) in both environmental gain and loss frames, exponential models could fit social discounting of environmental outcomes better than hyperbolic model; (2) the interaction between social distance and task frame could influence the social discounting rate. As social distance increased, the discounting rate increased more rapidly for environmental gain than for environmental loss; (3) altruism had moderate effect on the relationship between social distance and social discounting. For participants with high level of altruism, social distance had less impact on social discounting.
In conclusion, this study suggests that social distance, altruism, and task frame may play important roles in people's environmental decision-making. These findings enlighten us that decision makers may become more pro-environmental if some measures are taken to enhance their altruistic tendencies and reduce their psychological distance with others.

Key words:environmental outcome,social distance,social discounting,task frame,altruism

ReleaseDate:2017-11-17 09:47:14

Andersson, O., Holm, H. J., Tyran, J. R., & Wengström, E. (2013). Deciding for others reduces loss aversion. Working Paper, 55, 355-364.

Aquino, K., Freeman, D., Reed, A., Felps, W., & Lim, V. K. (2009). Testing a social-cognitive model of moral behavior:the interactive influence of situations and moral identity centrality. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 97, 123.

Bar-Tal, D. (1986). Altruistic motivation to help:Definition, utility and operationalization. Humboldt Journal of Social Relations, 13, 3-14.

Bartels, D. M., & Rips, L. J. (2010). Psychological connectedness and intertemporal choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 139, 49-69.

Chen, H. X., & He, G. B. (2011). The effect of construal level on intertemporal choice and risky choice. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 43, 442-452.[陈海贤, 何贵兵. (2011). 识解水平对跨期选择和风险选择的影响. 心理学报, 43:442-452.]

DeWall, C. N., Baumeister, R. F., Gailliot, M. T., & Maner, J. K. (2008). Depletion makes the heart grow less helpful:Helping as a function of self-regulatory energy and genetic relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1653-1662.

Duan, J., Liu, Y. F., & He, Q. (2012). The effects of decision makers' roles and related variables on risk preferences. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 44, 369-376.[段婧, 刘永芳, 何琪. (2012). 决策者角色及相关变量对风险偏好的影响. 心理学报, 44, 369-376.]

Dutt, V., & Gonzalez, C. (2012). Why do we want to delay actions on climate change? Effects of probability and timing of climate consequences. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25, 154-164.

Ersner-Hershfield, H., Garton, M. T., Ballard, K., Samanez-Larkin, G. R., & Knutson, B. (2009). Don't stop thinking about tomorrow:Individual differences in future self-continuity account for saving. Judgment and Decision making, 4, 280-286.

Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., & O'Donoghue, T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference:A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 351-401.

Fritsche, I., Jonas, E., Kayser, D. N., & Koranyi, N. (2010). Existential threat and compliance with pro-environmental norms. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 67-79.

Gifford, R. (2011). The dragons of inaction:Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. American Psychology, 66, 290-302.

Gong, M., Krantz, D., & Weber, E. U. (2014). Why Chinese discount future financial and environmental gains but not losses more than Americans. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 49, 103-124.

Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2004). A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 769-772.

Greenwood, G. W. (2010). Evolving N-person social dilemma strategies to resolve questions on participation in climate change programs. In Proceedings of 2010 IEEE symposium on computational intelligence and games (pp. 227-234). Dublin, Ireland:IEEE.

Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behavior. I. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1-16.

Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243-1248.

Hardisty, D. J. & Weber, E. U. (2009). Discounting future green:Money versus the environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 138, 329-340.

He, G. B., & Jiang, D. (2013). The effect of task frames and altruism on social discounting. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 45, 1131-1146.[何贵兵, 蒋多. (2013). 任务框架及利他人格对社会折扣的影响. 心理学报, 45, 1131-1146.]

Hoffman, M. L. (1975). Altruistic behavior and the parent-child relationship. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 31, 937-943.

Hsee, C. K., & Weber, E. U. (1997). A fundamental prediction error:Self-others discrepancies in risk preference. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 126, 45-53.

Jones, B., & Rachlin, H. (2006). Social discounting. Psychological Science, 17, 283-286.

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory:An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-292.

Liu, Y., & Sun, Y. (2016). Time unpacking effect and its impact on intertemporal decision making. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 48, 362-370.[刘扬, 孙彦. (2016). 时间分解效应及其对跨期决策的影响. 心理学报, 48, 362-370.]

Liu, Y., Xie, C., & She, S. X. (2014). Perception of delayed environmental risks:Beyond time discounting. Disaster Prevention and Management:An International Journal, 23, 112-122.

Loewenstein, G. F., & Prelec, D. (1992). Preferences for sequences of outcomes. Psychological Review, 100, 91-108.

Madsen, E. A., Tunney, R. J., Fieldman, G., Plotkin, H. C., Dunbar, R. I. M., Richardson, J.-M., & McFarland, D. (2007). Kinship and altruism:A cross-cultural experimental study. British Journal of Psychology, 98, 339-359.

Ma-Kellams, C., Spencer-Rodgers, J., & Peng, K. P. (2011). I am against us? Unpacking cultural differences in ingroup favoritism via dialecticism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 15-27.

Maner, J. K., & Gailliot M. T. (2007). Altruism and egoism:Prosocial motivations for helping depend on relationship context. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 347-358.

Myerson, J., Green, L., & Warusawitharana, M. (2001). Area under the curve as a measure of discounting. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 76, 235-243.

Nakao, T., Tokunaga, S., Takamura, M., Nashiwa, S., Hayashi, H., & Miyatani, M. (2012). Altruistic people show no self-reference effect in memory. The Journal of General Psychology, 139, 29-41.

Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and persons. Oxford, England:Oxford University Press.

Penner, L. A., & Finkelstein, M. A. (1998). Dispositional and structural determinants of volunteerism. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 74, 525-537.

Polman, E. (2012). Self-other decision making and loss aversion. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119, 141-150.

Rachlin, H. (2002). Altruism and selfishness. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 25, 239-250.

Rushton, J. P., Chrisjohn, R. D., & Fekken, G. C. (1981). The altruistic personality and the self-report altruism scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 2, 293-302.

Sun, Y. (2011). The intertemporal choice under risk:A research proposal. Advances in Psychological Science, 19, 28-34.[孙彦. (2011). 风险条件下的跨期选择. 心理科学进展, 19, 28-34.]

Sun, Y., & Li, S. (2010). The effect of risk on intertemporal choice. Journal of Risk Research, 13, 805-820.

Svenson, O., & Karlsson, G. (1989). Decision-making, time horizons, and risk in the very long-term perspective. Risk Analysis, 9, 385-399.

Takahashi, T. (2013). The q-exponential social discounting functions of gain and loss. Applied Mathematics, 4, 445-448.

Tang, S. J., Hao, J., & Tu, Y. J. (2011). Revision of Mach-IV in Chinese college students. China Journal of Health Psychology, 19, 967-969.[汤舒俊, 郝佳, 涂阳军. (2011). 马基雅弗利主义量表在中国大学生中的修订. 中国健康心理学杂志, 19, 967-969.]

Thaler, R. (1981). Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency. Economics Letters, 8, 201-207.

Toi, M., & Batson, C. D. (1982). More evidence that empathy is a source of altruistic motivation. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 43, 281-292.

Toma, L., & Mathijs, E. (2007). Environmental risk perception, environmental concern and propensity to participate in organic farming programmes. Journal of Environmental Management, 83, 145-157.

Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440-463.

van Vugt, M., & Samuelson, C. D. (1999). The impact of personal metering in the management of a natural resource crisis:A social dilemma analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 735-750.

Xu, J. Z., & Xie, X. F. (2011). Self-other decision making difference:A construal level perspective. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 43, 11-20.[徐惊蛰, 谢晓非. (2011). 解释水平视角下的自己-他人决策差异. 心理学报, 43, 11-20.]

Yang, Z. J. (2016). Altruism during Ebola:Risk perception, issue salience, cultural cognition, and information processing. Risk Analysis, 36, 1079-1089.

Zhang, W., He, G. B., Zhu, Y., & Cheng, L. (2014). Effects of psychological distance on assessment of severity of water pollution. Social Behavior and Personality:An International Journal, 42, 69-78.

Zhu, Y., Zhang, L., Fan, J., & Han, S. H. (2007). Neural basis of cultural influence on self-representation. NeuroImage, 34, 1310-1316.