doi:

DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.01344

Acta Psychologica Sinica (心理学报) 2017/49:10 PP.1344-1356

Cooperative or conflicting:The influence of endorsers' relationship types in group endorsement on advertising effectiveness


Abstract:
Marketing practice has recently seen an increasing number of ads featuring more than one celebrity endorser in one ad. Although many studies have been conducted to investigate the effect of endorsement, little research attention has been given to group endorsement and hardly any studies have focused on the relationships between endorsers (cooperative vs. conflicting) in one ad. Building on the studies about advertising effectiveness and conflict, the current research proposes that the conflicting group endorsement brought stronger advertising effectiveness than the cooperative one. The mediating effect of consumers' perceived vividness of the ad and the moderating effects of consumers' affect intensity and the degree of discrepancy between endorsers were also examined.
Two pretests and three main experiments were conducted to test the proposed hypotheses. Following the methods in previous studies, three products matching up with the two endorsers used in this study were screened in Pretest 1. The validity of the manipulation of endorsers' relationship types were verified in Pretest 2. In Experiment 1, a one factor (endorsers' relationship type:cooperative vs. conflicting) between subjects design with 99 participants was adopted to examine the effect of endorsers' relationship types on advertising effectiveness and the mediating effect of consumers' perceived vividness. The descriptions of product, endorsers and their relationship types verified in the pretests were used and advertising effectiveness and perceived vividness were measured by established scales. Following a similar procedure, a 2 (endorsers' relationship type:cooperative vs. conflicting)×2(affect intensity:high and low) between subjects design with 91 participants was adopted to examine the moderating effect of consumers' affect intensity in Experiment 2. The participants' affect intensity were measured by established scales and divided into two groups by the median. In Experiment 3, a 2 (endorsers' relationship type:cooperative vs. conflicting)×2(degree of the discrepancy between endorsers:high and low) between subjects design with 102 participants was adopted to examine the moderating effect of the degree of discrepancy between endorsers. The participants were asked to rate the two endorsers based on three attributes and they were further divided into two groups by the median of the absolute value of the difference.
The results revealed that, compared to the cooperative group endorsement, the conflicting group endorsement had positive impact on advertising effectiveness. This effect was mediated by consumers' perceived vividness of the ad. Furthermore, consumers' affect intensity moderated this effect. For consumers with higher affect intensity, the conflicting group endorsement promoted advertising effectiveness, but this effect did not happen for the consumers with lower affect intensity. The degree of discrepancy between endorsers also moderated this effect. When the discrepancy of consumers' evaluations of the endorsers in the group endorsement was small, the conflicting group endorsement had a positive effect on advertising effectiveness, but this effect did not happen when the discrepancy is large.
The current research provided empirical evidence to the influence of endorsers' relationship types in group endorsement on advertising effectiveness and its underlying process. This study expanded the research of advertising effectiveness from the perspective of endorsers' relationship type. The results reflected the positive role of conflict and verified the effect of vividness, and also highlighted the importance of consumers' and endorsers' properties. Moreover, these findings provided meaningful marketing implications for practical ad design and helped a brand to choose proper endorsers in group endorsement.

Key words:endorsers' relationship type,vividness,advertising effectiveness,affect intensity,degree of the discrepancy between endorsers

ReleaseDate:2017-11-17 09:47:14



Amason, A. C. (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making:Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 123-148.

Atkin, C., & Block, M. (1983). Effectiveness of celebrity endorsers. Journal of Advertising Research, 23, 57-61.

Baker, M. J., & Churchill, G. A., Jr. (1977). The impact of physically attractive models on advertising evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 538-555.

Baron, R. A., Fortin, S. P., Frei, R. L., Hauver, L. A., & Shack, M. L. (1990). Reducing organizational conflict:The role of socially-induced positive affect. International Journal of Conflict Management, 1, 133-152.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research:Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.

Batra, R., & Ray, M. L. (1986). Affective responses mediating acceptance of advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 234-249.

Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. S. (Eds.). (1984). Solving costly organizational conflicts. San Francisco, USA:Jossey-Bass.

Bodtker, A. M., & Jameson, J. K., (2001). Emotion in conflict formation and its transformation:Application to organizational conflict management. International Journal of Conflict Management, 12, 259-275.

Bone, P. F., & Ellen, P. S. (1992). The generation and consequences of communication-evoked imagery. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 93-104.

Chen, M. J., & Ayoko, O. B. (2012). Conflict and trust:The mediating effects of emotional arousal and self-conscious emotions. International Journal of Conflict Management, 23, 19-56.

Cosier, R. A. (1978). The effects of three potential aids for making strategic decisions on prediction accuracy. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, 295-306.

Coyle, J. R., & Thorson, E. (2001). The effects of progressive levels of interactivity and vividness in web marketing sites. Journal of Advertising, 30, 65-77.

Dean, D. H., & Biswas, A. (2001). Third-party organization endorsement of products:An advertising cue affecting consumer prepurchase evaluation of goods and services. Journal of Advertising, 30, 41-57.

Erdogan, B. Z. (1999). Celebrity endorsement:A literature review. Journal of Marketing Management, 15, 291-314.

Fan, X. P., Han, H. Y., & Sun, J. Q. (2013). Effects of website interactivity and vividness on consumers' product attitude:The moderating effect of need for cognition. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 27, 196-204.[范晓屏, 韩洪叶, 孙佳琦. 2013. 网站生动性和互动性对消费者产品态度的影响——认知需求的调节效应研究. 管理工程学报, 27, 196-204.]

Farrell, K. A., Karels, G. V., Montfort, K W, & McClatchey, C. A. (2000). Celebrity performance and endorsement value:The case of tiger woods. Managerial Finance, 26, 1-15.

Forkan, J. (1980). Product matchup key to effective star presentations. Advertising Age, 51, 42.

Fortin, D. R., & Dholakia, R. R. (2005). Interactivity and vividness effects on social presence and involvement with a web-based advertisement. Journal of Business Research, 58, 387-396.

Freiden, J. B. (1984). Advertising spokesperson effects-An examination of endorser type and gender on two audiences. Journal of Advertising Research, 24, 33-41.

Friedman, H. H., & Friedman, L. (1979). Endorser effectiveness by product type. Journal of Advertising Research, 19, 63-71.

Goldsmith, R. E., Lafferty, B. A., & Newell, S. J. (2000). The impact of corporate credibility and celebrity credibility on consumer reaction to advertisements and brands. Journal of Advertising, 29, 43-54.

Gong, Y. P., & Xu, H. (2015, October). Research on endorsement of a single and composite validity in advertisement from self-construal theory point of view. In The eleventh annual conference of JMS China marketing science. Shanghai, China.[龚艳萍, 许焕. (2015, 10月). 自我建构理论视角下广告中单人代言和组合代言的有效性研究. 见:第十二届中国营销科学学术年会. 上海.]

Haugtvedt, C. P., Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1992). Need for cognition and advertising:Understanding the role of personality variables in consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1, 239-260.

Holbrook, M. B., & O'Shaughnessy, J. (1984). The role of emotion in advertising. Psychology & Marketing, 1, 45-64.

Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15, 635-650.

Hsu, C. K., & McDonald, D. (2002). An examination on multiple celebrity endorsers in advertising. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 11, 19-29.

Jordan, P. J., & Troth, A. C. (2004). Managing emotions during team problem solving:Emotional intelligence and conflict resolution. Human performance, 17, 195-218.

Kahle, L. R., & Homer, P. M. (1985). Physical attractiveness of the celebrity endorser:A social adaptation perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 954-961.

Kamins, M. A. (1989). Celebrity and noncelebrity advertising in a two-sided context. Journal of Advertising Research, 29, 34-41.

Kamins, M. A. (1990). An investigation into the "match-up" hypothesis in celebrity advertising:When beauty may be only skin deep. Journal of Advertising, 19, 4-13.

Kensinger, E. A., & Corkin, S. (2003). Memory enhancement for emotional words:Are emotional words more vividly remembered than neutral words? Memory & Cognition, 31, 1169-1180.

Kirmani, A. (1990). The effect of perceived advertising costs on brand perceptions. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 160-171.

Kisielius, J., Sternthal, B. (1986). Examining the vividness controversy:An availability-valence interpretation. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 418-431.

Larsen, R. J., & Diener, E. (1987). Affect intensity as an individual difference characteristic:A review. Journal of Research in Personality, 21, 1-39.

Lee, J. A., & Kacen, J. J. (2008). Cultural influences on consumer satisfaction with impulse and planned purchase decisions. Journal of Business Research, 61, 265-272.

Liu, D. J., Jiang, M. H., & Zhang, J. J. (2006, April). An empirical study on the impact of endorsers' attractiveness on consumers' purchase intention under different match-up level. In The annual conference of china marketing association and the member representative assembly. Beijing, China.[刘丁己, 江明华, 张建君. (2006, 4月). 不同匹配度下代言人吸引力影响消费者购买意愿的实证研究. 见:中国市场学会2006年年会暨第四次全国会员代表大会论文集. 北京.]

Marks, D. F. (1973). Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures. British Journal of Psychology, 64, 17-24.

Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self:Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.

McCracken, G. (1989). Who is the celebrity endorser? Cultural foundations of the endorsement process. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 310-321.

Misra, S., & Beatty, S. E. (1990). Celebrity spokesperson and brand congruence:An assessment of recall and affect. Journal of Business Research, 21, 159-173.

Money, R. B., Shimp, T. A., & Sakano, T. (2006). Celebrity endorsements in Japan and the United States:Is negative information all that harmful? Journal of Advertising Research, 46, 113-123.

Moore, D. J., Harris, W. D., & Chen, H. C. (1995). Affect intensity:An individual difference response to advertising appeals. Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 154-164.

Mowen, J. C., & Brown, S. W. (1981). On explaining and predicting the effectiveness of celebrity endorsers. Advances in Consumer Research, 8, 437-441.

Nisbett, R., & Ross, L. (Eds.). (1980). Human inference:Strategies and shortcomings of social judgement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.

Ogunsiji, A. S. (2012). The impact of celebrity endorsement on strategic brand management. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3, 141-145.

Ohanian, R. (1990). Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers' perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. Journal of Advertising, 19, 39-52.

Olney, T. J., Holbrook, M. B., & Batra, R. (1991). Consumer responses to advertising:The effects of ad content, emotions, and attitude toward the ad on viewing time. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 440-453.

Parker, G. A. (1974). Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behaviour. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 47, 223-243.

Peterson, R. S., & Behfar, K. J. (2003). The dynamic relationship between performance feedback, trust, and conflict in groups:A longitudinal study. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 92, 102-112.

Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717-731.

Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses:Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185-227.

Pringle, H., & Binet, L. (2005). How marketers can use celebrities to sell more effectively. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 4, 201-214.

Rice, D. H., Kelting, K., & Lutz, R. J. (2012). Multiple endorsers and multiple endorsements:The influence of message repetition, source congruence and involvement on brand attitudes. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22, 249-259.

Saleem, F. (2007). Effect of single celebrity and multiple celebrity endorsement on low involvement and high involvement product advertisements. European Journal of Social Sciences, 5, 125-132.

Seno, D., & Lukas, B. A. (2007). The equity effect of product endorsement by celebrities:A conceptual framework from a co-branding perspective. European Journal of Marketing, 41, 121-134.

Shamdasani, P. N., Stanaland, A. J. S., & Tan, J. (2001). Location, location, location:Insights for advertising placement on the web. Journal of Advertising Research, 41, 7-21.

Simons, H. W., Berkowitz, N. N., & Moyer, R. J. (1970). Similarity, credibility, and attitude change:A review and a theory. Psychological Bulletin, 73, 1-16.

Singh, S. N., & Churchill, G. A., Jr. (1987). Arousal and advertising effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 16, 4-40.

Stulp, G., Kordsmeyer, T., Buunk, & Verhulst, S. (2012). Increased aggression during human group contests when competitive ability is more similar. Biology Letters, 8, 921-923.

Taylor, S. E., & Thompson, S. C. (1982). Stalking the elusive "vividness" effect. Psychological Review, 89, 155-181.

Tellis, G. J. (1997). Advertising and sales promotion strategy. NJ, USA:Prentice Hall.

Thomas, K. W. (1992). Conflict and negotiation processes in organizations. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed.). Palo Alto, CA, USA:Consulting Psychological Press.

Till, B. D., & Shimp, T. A. (1998). Endorsers in advertising:The case of negative celebrity information. Journal of Advertising, 27, 67-82.

Todd, R. M., Talmi, D., Schmitz, T. W., Susskind, J., & Anderson, A. K. (2012). Psychophysical and neural evidence for emotion-enhanced perceptual vividness. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 11201-11212.

Zhang, H. X., Sun, J., Liu, F., & Knight, J. G. (2014). Be rational or be emotional:Advertising appeals, service types and consumer responses. European Journal of Marketing, 48, 2105-2126.

Zhang, H. X., & Zhang, Y. (2010). Is nationality important? A new perspective on the relationship between celebrity endorsement and advertising effects. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 42, 304-316.[张红霞, 张益. (2010). 国别属性重要吗? 代言人与广告效果关系研究的新视角. 心理学报, 42, 304-316.]