DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.01449

Acta Psychologica Sinica (心理学报) 2017/49:11 PP.1449-1459

Resolving “Commuting Paradox”: How commute time influences subjective well-being

People in today's society spend a substantial amount of their time traveling to and from work. Researchers have rightfully concerned themselves with the question of if and how commuting affects people's lives. Some behavioral economists suggested that commute time play a negative effect on individuals' life satisfaction. This phenomenon is called "commuting paradox", in which individuals' utility are imbalance due to longer commuting time is not compensated. The present study regards commute time as the work-family transition zone, such as social transition zone and psychological transition zone. With these perspectives, we aimed to examine the moderating roles that marital status (social transition zone) and recovery experiences (psychological transition zone) play in the relationship between commute time and subjective well-being. What is more, the mediating mechanism of commuting utility was explored.
In order to test our model, we conducted a survey on 822 part-time graduates from three colleges. Data were collected from 3 follow-up surveys to avoid the common method bias. Participants were asked to fill out questionnaires at three time points (Time 1:commute time, marital status and recovery experiences; Time 2:commuting utility; and Time 3:satisfaction with life, happiness). These variables were assessed by:commute time survey, marital status survey, recovery experiences questionnaire, satisfaction with life scale, PANA scale, and Princeton affect and time survey. All Cronbach's alpha coefficients were acceptable (ranging from 0.83 to 0.91). Descriptive statistics and hierarchical polynomial regression analysis were applied to test the hypotheses.
The results indicated that:(1) marital status (social transition zone) moderated effects of commute time on subjective well-being, i.e., unmarried employees' commute time had negative impact on life satisfaction, married employees' commuting time had U shape impact on life satisfaction, happiness and occupational well-being; (2) recovery experiences during work→home commute (psychological transition zone) moderated effects of commute time on outcome variables, i.e., psychological detachment moderated relationships between unmarried employees' commute time and commuting utility; relax experience moderated the relationship between unmarried employees' commute time and happiness; (3) effects of married employees' commute time on commuting utility and happiness were moderated by relax experience, whereas the relationship between married employees' commute time and life satisfaction were moderated by psychological detachment; (4) commuting utility not only mediated the effects of commute time on life satisfaction and happiness, but also mediated the moderations of marital status and recover experiences; (5) employees' utility equilibrium were found during "commuting time trap" (1.75 h-2.75 h), in which longer commuting time was compensated.
Significance:The present study analyzed the commuting paradox from two aspects, including social transition zone and psychological transition zone. Then we built a theoretical model regarding how commute time influences employee's subjective well-being. Together, our findings contribute to the literature by helping to (a) provided a psychological explanation for commuting paradox, (b) integrate commuting utility, life satisfaction and happiness, (c) resolve mixed findings regarding the issue of commute time and subjective well-being. The managerial implications of our findings, limitations, as well as future research directions were discussed.

Key words:commuting paradox,subjective well-being,commute time,recovery experience,commuting transition zone.

ReleaseDate:2017-12-29 15:49:12

Ashforth, B. E., Kreiner, G. E., & Fugate, M. (2000). All in a day's work:Boundaries and micro role transitions. Academy of Management Review, 25, 472-491.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research:Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.

Clark, S. C. (2000). Work/family border theory:A new theory of work/family balance. Human Relations, 53, 747-770.

Dickerson, A., Hole, A. R., & Munford, L. A. (2014). The relationship between well-being and commuting revisited:Does the choice of methodology matter? Regional Science and Urban Economics, 49, 321-329.

Geurts, S. A. E., & Sonnentag, S. (2006). Recovery as an explanatory mechanism in the relation between acute stress reactions and chronic health impairment. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 32, 482-492.

Girme, Y. U., Overall, N. C., Simpson, J. A., & Fletcher, G. J. O. (2015). "All or nothing":Attachment avoidance and the curvilinear effects of partner support. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 450-475.

Humphreys, D. K., Goodman, A., & Ogilvie, D. (2013). Associations between active commuting and physical and mental wellbeing. Preventive Medicine, 57, 135-139.

Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2004). A survey method for characterizing daily life experience:The day reconstruction method. Science, 306, 1776-1780.

Kroesen, M. (2014). Assessing mediators in the relationship between commute time and subjective well-being:Structural equation analysis. Transportation Research Record:Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2452, 114-123.

Ma, L., & Liu, H. (2015). The work and nonwork boundary management strategies and their effect. Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences, (12), 25-33.[马璐, 刘洪. (2015). 员工工作与非工作边界管理风格类型及其效果研究. 南京社会科学, (12), 25-33.]

Martin, A., Goryakin, Y., & Suhrcke, M. (2014). Does active commuting improve psychological wellbeing? Longitudinal evidence from eighteen waves of the British household panel survey. Preventive Medicine, 69, 296-303.

Milakis, D., Cervero, R., & van Wee, B. (2015). Stay local or go regional? Urban form effects on vehicle use at different spatial scales:A theoretical concept and its application to the San Francisco Bay Area. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 8, 59-86.

Milakis, D., Cervero, R., van Wee, B., & Maat, K. (2015). Do people consider an acceptable travel time? Evidence from Berkeley, CA. Journal of Transport Geography, 44, 76-86.

Moreno-Jiménez, B., Mayo, M., Sanz-Vergel, A. I., Geurts, S., Rodríguez-Muñoz, A., & Garrosa, E. (2009). Effects of work-family conflict on employees' well-being:The moderating role of recovery strategies. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14, 427-440.

Nie, P., & Sousa-Poza, A. (2016). Commute time and subjective well-being in urban China. China Economic Review, doi:10.1016/j.chieco.2016.03.002.

Olsson, L. E., Gärling, T., Ettema, D., Friman, M., & Fujii, S. (2013). Happiness and satisfaction with work commute. Social Indicators Research, 111, 255-263.

Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 164-172.

Roberts, J., Hodgson, R., & Dolan, P. (2011). "It's driving her mad":Gender differences in the effects of commuting on psychological health. Journal of Health Economics, 30, 1064-1076.

Smith, O. B. (2013). Peak of the day or the daily grind:Commuting and subjective well-being (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Portland State University.

Sonnentag, S., & Fritz, C. (2007). The recovery experience questionnaire:Development and validation of a measure for assessing recuperation and unwinding from work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12, 204-221.

Spector, P. E., Cooper, C. L., Poelmans, S., Allen, T. D., O'Driscoll, M., Sanchez, J., … Lu, L. (2004). A cross-national comparative study of work-family stressors, working hours, and well-being:China and Latin America versus the Anglo world. Personnel Psychology, 57, 119-142.

Stutzer, A., & Frey, B. S. (2008). Stress that Doesn't Pay:The Commuting Paradox. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 110, 339-366.

Tay, L., & Diener, E. (2011). Needs and subjective well-being around the world. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 354-365.

Turcotte, M. (2011). Commuting to work:Results of the 2010 general social survey. Canada Social Trends, 92, 25-36.

van Hooff, M. L. M. (2015). The daily commute from work to home:Examining employees' experiences in relation to their recovery status. Stress and Health, 31, 124-137.

Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect:The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.

Gao, Z. H., & Zhao, C. (2014). Why is it difficult to balance work and family? An analysis based on work-family boundary theory. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 46, 552-568.[高中华, 赵晨. (2014). 工作家庭两不误为何这么难? 基于工作家庭边界理论的探讨. 心理学报, 46, 552-568.]

Wen, Z. L., & Ye, B. J. (2014). Analyses of mediating effects:The development of methods and models. Advances in Psychological Science, 22, 731-745.[温忠麟, 叶宝娟. (2014). 中介效应分析:方法和模型发展. 心理科学进展, 22, 731-745.]

Wu, W. J. (2016). The impact of hours worked on occupational well-being:An empirical analysis based on three typical occupations. China Industrial Economics, (3), 130-145.[吴伟炯. (2016). 工作时间对职业幸福感的影响:基于三种典型职业的实证分析. 中国工业经济, (3), 130-145.]

Zheng, S. Q., Xu, Y. F., & Gu, Y. Z. (2014). Rethinking "jobs-housing balance":Providing more choices rather than imposing constraints. Academic Monthly, 46(5), 29-39.[郑思齐, 徐杨菲, 谷一桢. (2014). 如何应对"职住分离":"疏"还是"堵"? 学术月刊, 46(5), 29-39.]