DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00253

Acta Psychologica Sinica (心理学报) 2018/50:3 PP.253-259

Access to awareness is improved by affective learning

Increasing evidence has indicated that emotional information, and particularly threatening visual input, elicits faster behavioral responses than non-threatening stimuli. This superior processing of threatening information is also found under conditions where consciousness is absent. However, recent studies found that faster unconscious detection of emotion-associated stimuli than neutral stimuli may be due to their unmatched physical characteristics, rather than by their emotional content. Thus, it is necessary to test whether emotional stimuli still have the processing advantage over neutral ones in unconscious conditions when low-level visual properties are matched.
In order to investigate whether unconsciously prioritized processing still occurs with emotion-associated stimuli which are physically identical, we used the conditioning paradigm to manipulate the affective significance of Gabor patches. Participants performed two challenging visual detection tasks under the breaking Continuous Flash Suppression (b-CFS) paradigm. In experiment 1, differently oriented Gabor patches (45° and 135°) were used as material. During an initial learning phase, one oriented Gabor patch (e.g., 45°) was paired with an alarm sound (CS+), whereas the other was never paired with the alarm sound (CS-). The emotional rating indicated that negative emotion could be elicited by the alarm sound in the participants. The orientation of CS+ Gabor patches was counterbalanced across participants. In the subsequent testing phase, participants were required to discriminate the location of the Gabor patch relative to the central fixation as quickly and accurately as possible. In this phase, Gabor patches were suppressed by dynamic noise using b-CFS. The procedure in experiment 2 was the same with that in experiment 1, except that the color of the Gabor patches was also varied, between red and green.
In experiment 1, there was no difference in the accuracy rates between CS+ stimuli and CS-stimuli (99% vs. 99%). Suppression time results showed that CS+ stimuli emerged from suppression faster than CS-ones. In experiment 2, there was no difference in the accuracy rates for different learning condition. For the analysis of suppression time, the "learning effect" was computed to represent difference between experimental conditions and control condition. Integrated learning showed a significant learning effect, while there was no remarkable learning effect in orientation learning or in color learning condition.
These findings revealed an unconscious processing advantage for aversive conditioned stimuli. Furthermore, the learning effect was specific to the conditioned stimuli and could not generalize to other similar objects. Taken together, this study provided further evidence for the optimized processing of affectively significant visual stimuli in unconscious conditions.

Key words:affective learning,breaking Continuous Flash Suppression,unconscious processing

ReleaseDate:2018-03-29 16:23:26

Almeida, J., Pajtas, P. E., Mahon, B. Z., Nakayama, K., & Caramazza, A. (2013). Affect of the unconscious:Visually suppressed angry faces modulate our decisions. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 13, 94-101.

Armony, J. L., & Dolan, R. J. (2002). Modulation of spatial attention by fear-conditioned stimuli:An event-related fMRI study. Neuropsychologia, 40, 817-826.

Bieszczad, K. M., & Weinberger, N. M. (2010). Learning strategy trumps motivational level in determining learning-induced auditory cortical plasticity. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 93, 229-239.

Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.

Damaraju, E., Huang, Y. M., Barrett, L. F., & Pessoa, L. (2009). Affective learning enhances activity and functional connectivity in early visual cortex. Neuropsychologia, 47, 2480-2487.

Gayet, S., Paffen, C. L. E., Belopolsky, A. V., Theeuwes, J., & van der Stigchel, S. (2016). Visual input signaling threat gains preferential access to awareness in a breaking continuous flash suppression paradigm. Cognition, 149, 77-83.

Gray, K. L. H., Adams, W. J., Hedger, N., Newton, K. E., & Garner, M. (2013). Faces and awareness:Low-level, not emotional factors determine perceptual dominance. Emotion, 13, 537-544.

Hansen, C. H., & Hansen, R. D. (1988). Finding the face in the crowd:an anger superiority effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 917-924.

Hedger, N., Adams, W. J., & Garner, M. (2015). Fearful faces have a sensory advantage in the competition for awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 41, 1748-1757.

Jiang, Y., Costello, P., Fang, F., Huang, M., & He, S. (2006). A gender-and sexual orientation-dependent spatial attentional effect of invisible images. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 17048-17052.

Jiang, Y., Costello, P., & He, S. (2007). Processing of invisible stimuli:Advantage of upright faces and recognizable words in overcoming interocular suppression. Psychological Science, 18, 349-355.

Jiang, Y., & He, S. (2006). Cortical responses to invisible faces:Dissociating subsystems for facial-information processing. Current Biology, 16, 2023-2029.

Knight, D. C., Nguyen, H. T., & Bandettini, P. A. (2005). The role of the human amygdala in the production of conditioned fear responses. NeuroImage, 26, 1193-1200.

LeDoux, J. E. (2000). Emotion circuits in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23, 155-158.

Lerner, Y., Singer, N., Gonen, T., Weintraub, Y., Cohen, O., Rubin, N., … Hendler, T. (2012). Feeling without seeing? Engagement of ventral, but not dorsal, amygdala during unaware exposure to emotional faces. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 531-542.

Li, W., Howard, J. D., Parrish, T. B., & Gottfried, J. A. (2008). Aversive learning enhances perceptual and cortical discrimination of indiscriminable odor cues. Science, 319, 1842-1845.

Lin, Z. C., & He, S. (2009). Seeing the invisible:The scope and limits of unconscious processing in binocular rivalry. Progress in Neurobiology, 87, 195-211.

Morris, J. S., Öhman, A., & Dolan, R. J. (1998). Conscious and unconscious emotional learning in the human amygdala. Nature, 393, 467-470.

Notebaert, L., Crombez, G., Van Damme, S., De Houwer, J., & Theeuwes, J. (2011). Signals of threat do not capture, but prioritize, attention:A conditioning cpproach. Emotion, 11, 81-89.

Padmala, S., & Pessoa, L. (2008). Affective learning enhances visual detection and responses in primary visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 6202-6210.

Pelli, D. G. (1997). The videotoolbox software for visual psychophysics:Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442.

Phelps, E. A., Ling, S., & Carrasco, M. (2006). Emotion facilitates perception and potentiates the perceptual benefits of attention. Psychological Science, 17, 292-299.

Purcell, D. G., Stewart, A. L., & Skov, R. B. (1996). It takes a confounded face to pop out of a crowd. Perception, 25, 1091-1108.

Rajimehr, R. (2004). Unconscious orientation processing. Neuron, 41, 663-673.

Schmidt, L. J., Belopolsky, A. V., & Theeuwes, J. (2014). Attentional capture by signals of threat. Cognition and Emotion, 29, 687-694.

Stein, T., & Sterzer, P. (2012). Not just another face in the crowd:Detecting emotional schematic faces during continuous flash suppression. Emotion, 12, 988-996.

Whalen, P. J. (2004). Human amygdala responsivity to masked fearful eye whites. Science, 306, 2061.

Woods, A. J., Philbeck, J. W., & Wirtz, P. (2013). Hyper-arousal decreases human visual thresholds. PLoS One, 8, e61415.

Yang, E., Zald, D. H., & Blake, R. (2007). Fearful expressions gain preferential access to awareness during continuous flash suppression. Emotion, 7, 882-886.

Zhan, M., Hortensius, R., & de Gelder, B. (2015). The body as a tool for anger awareness-differential effects of angry facial and bodily expressions on suppression from awareness. PLoS One, 10, e0139768.