DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00327

Acta Psychologica Sinica (心理学报) 2018/50:3 PP.327-336

Coaching leadership effect on employees' creativity:Multilevel moderated mediator analysis

Due to the changing environment and intense competition, reform has become an important strategy for organizations to retain their competitive edge, and employees' creative behavior has been the key successful factor in promoting business change. Though numerous studies have shown the importance of leadership style in predicting employees' creative behavior, few of them have reviewed coaching leadership. In this study, we propose a cross-level mediated moderation model based on "culture self-representation theory" in the specific Chinese cultural context. Most importantly, we examine the mechanism of coaching leadership on employees' creative behavior through the mediation of creative self-efficacy, and the moderating role of personal traditionality.
Data were collected from various companies located in the South China region through a questionnaire. In order to avoid common method bias, data were collected in three stages, three months apart. On Stage 1, 71 leaders responded to questions assessing their level of coaching leadership. About three months later, in Stage 2, 301 subordinates completed the survey which assessed their personal traditionality and creative self-efficacy. In Stage 3, those subordinates' creative behavior was evaluated by their immediate supervisors. In this last stage, 247 subordinate-supervisor dyads were matched, The Mplus 7.4 and SPSS 23.0 statistical analysis packages were used to analyze the data. To test the hypothesis proposed, in addition to multilevel analysis, the Monte Carlo simulation method was employed.
In order to enhance the interpretability of model, we constructed a cross-level model with coaching leadership at Level 1, and we modeled subordinates' personal traditionality, and creative self-efficacy and creative behavior was modeled at Level 2. Multilevel structural equation modeling was used to analyze the data. The results showed that:(1) Coaching leadership was positively related to employees' creative behavior (γ=0.23, p < 0.05); (2) Employees' creative self-efficacy fully mediated the relationship between coaching leadership and creative behavior (γ=0.10, p < 0.05). Theconfidence interval of the Monte Carlo simulation also supported this result (LLCI=0.02, ULCI=0.25); (3) Personal traditionality positively moderated the relationship between coaching leadership and creative self-efficacy (γ=0.45, p < 0.01), with the Monte Carlo method being used to test the mediated moderation effect showing that the confidence interval of the effect of personal traditionality did not include 0. This indicated that the mediated moderation effect was statistically significant, showing that the indirect effect of coaching leadership on employees' creative behavior via creative self-efficacy was stronger for employees with high level of personal traditionality.
These conclusions will contribute to the literature and to management practices. First, this research reveals and supports the mediating effect of creative self-efficacy upon the relationship between coaching leadership and employees' creative behavior based on culture self-representation theory. This provides an additional avenue for research on how leadership style influences an individual's behavior. In addition, the moderating effect of traditionality helps us to better understand the influence of coaching leadership in the Chinese cultural context. Beyond the theoretical contributions, the results provide implications on how organizations may stimulate their employees' creative behavior. Our findings suggest that organizations should pay attention to their leadership training program, which is closely related to their employees' creative behavior. In addition, their employees' self-efficacy is strongly linked to their initiative. Thus, superiors should pay greater attention to promoting their subordinates' creative self-efficacy.

Key words:coaching leadership,traditionality,creative self-efficacy,creative behavior

ReleaseDate:2018-03-29 16:23:27

Anderson, V. (2013). A Trojan horse? The implications of managerial coaching for leadership theory. Human Resource Development International, 16(3), 251-266.

Bozer, G., Sarros, J., & Santora, J. (2012). Examining the effectiveness of executive coaching on coaches' performance in the Israeli context. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching & Mentoring, 10(1), 14-32.

Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (vol. 2, pp. 349-444). Boston:Allyn and Bacon.

Carmeli, A., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Ziv, E. (2010). Inclusive leadership and employee involvement in creative tasks in the workplace:The mediating role of psychological safety. Creativity Research Journal, 22(3), 250-260.

Chen, Z. X., & Aryee, S. (2007). Delegation and employee work outcomes:An examination of the cultural context of mediating processes in China. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 226-238.

Crane, T. G., & Patrick, L. N. (2012). The heart of coaching:Using transformational coaching to create a high-performance coaching culture. (4rd Ed.). San Diego, CA:FTA Press.

Dhar, R. L. (2016). Ethical leadership and its impact on service innovative behavior:The role of LMX and job autonomy. Tourism Management, 57, 139-148.

Eisenbeiß, S. A., & Boerner, S. (2013). A double-edged sword:Transformational leadership and individual creativity. British Journal of Management, 24(1), 54-68.

Ely, K., Boyce, L. A., Nelson, J. K., Zaccaro, S. J., Hernez-Broome, G., & Whyman, W. (2010). Evaluating leadership coaching:A review and integrated framework. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(4), 585-599.

Erez, M., & Earley, P. C. (1993). Culture, self-identity, and work. New York, NY:Oxford University Press.

Farh, J. L., Earley, P. C., & Lin, S. C. (1997). Impetus for action:A cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3), 421-444.

Farh, J. L., Hackett, R. D., & Liang, J. (2007). Individual-level cultural values as moderators of perceived organizational support-employee outcome relationships in China:Comparing the effects of power distance and traditionality. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 715-729.

Fast, N. J., Burris, E. R., & Bartel, C. A. (2014). Managing to stay in the dark:Managerial self-efficacy, ego defensiveness, and the aversion to employee voice. Academy of Management Journal, 57(4), 1013-1034.

Gong, Y., Huang, J. C., & Farh, J. L. (2009). Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity:the mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 765-778.

Hoch, J. E. (2013). Shared leadership and innovation:The role of vertical leadership and employee integrity. Journal of Business and Psychology, 28(2), 159-174.

Jaiswal, N. K., & Dhar, R. L. (2015). Transformational leadership, innovation climate, creative self-efficacy and employee creativity:A multilevel study. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 51, 30-41.

Jiang, D. Y., & Cheng, B. S. (2008). Affect-and role-based loyalty to supervisors in Chinese organizations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 11(3), 214-221.

Knippenberg, D. V., van Knippenberg, B., De Cremer, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2004). Leadership, self, and identity:A review and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(6), 825-856.

Komarraju, M., & Nadler, D. (2013). Self-efficacy and academic achievement:Why do implicit beliefs, goals, and effort regulation matter? Learning and Individual Differences, 25, 67-72.

Li, F. J., Yu, K. F., Yang, J. X., Qi, Z. J., & Fu, H. Y. (2014). Authentic leadership, traditionality, and interactional justice in the Chinese context. Management and Organization Review, 10(2), 249-273.

Liu, J., Kwan, H. K., Fu, P. P., & Mao, Y. (2013). Ethical leadership and job performance in China:The roles of workplace friendships and traditionality. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86(4), 564-584.

Ma, L., & Wang, D. Y. (2016). The influence of shared leadership on employee proactive innovation behavior. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 33(22), 131-136.

[马璐, 王丹阳. (2016). 共享型领导对员工主动创新行为的影响. 科技进步与对策, 33(22), 131-136.]

Malik, M. A. R., Butt, A. N., & Choi, J. N. (2015). Rewards and employee creative performance:Moderating effects of creative self-efficacy, reward importance, and locus of control. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(1), 59-74.

Mathisen, G. E. (2011). Organizational antecedents of creative self-efficacy. Creativity and Innovation Management, 20(3), 185-195.

Moen, F., & Federici, R. A. (2012). The effect of external executive coaching and coaching-based leadership on need satisfaction. Organization Development Journal, 30(3), 63-74.

Newman, K. L., & Nollen, S. D. (1996). Culture and congruence:The fit between management practices and national culture. Journal of International Business Studies, 27(4), 753-779.

Özduran, A., & Tanova, C. (2017). Coaching and employee organizational citizenship behaviors:The role of procedural justice climate. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 60, 58-66.

Pousa, C., & Mathieu, A. (2015). Is managerial coaching a source of competitive advantage? Promoting employee self-regulation through coaching. Coaching:An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 8(1), 20-35.

Preacher, K. J., Zyphur, M. J., & Zhang, Z. (2010). A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods, 15(3), 209-233.

Reid, K. (2016). Managerial Coaching:Investigating the mediating effect of role clarity on employee turnover intention (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Oklahoma Graduate College, Oklahoma.

Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior:A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607.

Shin, S. J., & Zhou, J. (2003). Transformational leadership, conservation, and creativity:Evidence from Korea. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 703-714.

Smither, J. W., London, M., Flautt, R., Vargas, Y., & Kucine, I. (2003). Can working with an executive coach improve multisource feedback ratings over time? A quasi-experimental field study. Personnel Psychology, 56(1), 23-44.

Spreitzer, G. M., Perttula, K. H., & Xin, K. (2005). Traditionality matters:An examination of the effectiveness of transformational leadership in the united states and Taiwan. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(3), 205-227.

Theeboom, T., Beersma, B., & van Vianen, A. E. (2014). Does coaching work? A meta-analysis on the effects of coaching on individual level outcomes in an organizational context. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 9(1), 1-18.

Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy:Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Review, 45(6), 1137-1148.

Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2011). Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 277-293.

Wang, C. J., Tsai, H. T., & Tsai, M. T. (2014). Linking transformational leadership and employee creativity in the hospitality industry:The influences of creative role identity, creative self-efficacy, and job complexity. Tourism Management, 40, 79-89.

Wang, Y. F., Zhang, J. R., Lin, X. C., Zhou, L., H. & Zhu, Y. (2016). A literature review of coaching leadership behavior and prospects. Foreign Economics & Management, 38(5), 44-57.

[王雁飞, 张静茹, 林星驰, 周良海, 朱瑜. (2016). 教练型领导行为研究现状与展望. 外国经济与管理, 38(5), 44-57.]

Wang, Y. Y., & Ye, J. J. (2016). Ethical leadership, creative self-efficacy, and employees' creativity:the moderate effect of performance. Science of Science and Management of S. & T., 36(9), 164-172.

[王永跃, 叶佳佳. (2015). 伦理型领导、创造力自我效能感及员工创造力——绩效的调节作用. 科学学与科学技术管理, 36(9), 164-172.]

Wang, Y. Q., Long, L. R., & Zhou, H. (2012). Organizational injustice perception and workplace deviance:mechanisms of negative emotion and traditionality. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 44(12), 1663-1676.

[王宇清, 龙立荣, 周浩. (2012). 消极情绪在程序和互动不公正感与员工偏离行为间的中介作用:传统性的调节机制. 心理学报, 44(12), 1663-1676.]

Xu, Z. T., & Luo, J. L. (2016). Research on the relationship between self-sacrificial leadership and employee creativity:Multilevel role of support climate for creativity. Science of Science and Management of Science & Technology, 37(11), 166-180.

[徐振亭, 罗瑾琏. (2016). 自我牺牲型领导对员工创造力的影响-创造力支持氛围的跨层次效应. 科学学与科学技术管理, 37(11), 166-180.]

Yang, K. S., Yu, A. B., & Yeh, M. H. (1989). Chinese individual modernity and traditionality:Construct definition and measurement. The Psychology and Behavior of Chinese People. Taipei:Laurel book publishing company, 287-354.

[杨国枢, 余安邦, 叶明华. (1989). 中国人的现代性与传统性:概念与测量. 中国人心理与行为. 台湾:桂冠图书出版公司, 287-354.]

Yang, G. A. (2010). Organizational capability:Secrets of sustainable business success. Beijing:China Machine Press.

[杨国安. (2010). 组织能力的杨三角:企业持续成功的秘诀. 北京:机械工业出版社.]

Zhang, X., & Zhou, J., (2014). Empowering leadership, uncertainty avoidance, trust, and employee creativity:Interaction effects and a mediating mechanism. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 124(2), 150-164.

Zhang, Z, X., Shi, J. Q., & Liu, J. (2016). Advances and frontiers in research of organizational behavior and leadership. Advances in Psychological Science, 24(3), 317-326.

[张志学, 施俊琦, 刘军. (2016). 组织行为与领导力研究的进展与前沿. 心理科学进展, 24(3), 317-326.]

Zhou, H., & Long, L. R. (2012). The Influence of transformational leadership on voice behavior:Mediating effect of psychological ownership for the organization and moderating effect of traditionality. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 44(3), 388-399.

[周浩, 龙立荣. (2012). 变革型领导对下属进谏行为的影响:组织心理所有权与传统性的作用. 心理学报, 44(3), 388-399.]