doi:

DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00450

Acta Psychologica Sinica (心理学报) 2018/50:4 PP.450-461

The impact of challenge stress and hindrance stress on employee creativity: The mediating role of self-efficacy and the moderating role of justice


Abstract:
Owing to their distinctive nature, challenge stress and hindrance stress may have different effects on individual creativity. Drawing on social cognitive theory perspective, we conducted a longitudinal empirical study concerning with the relationship between challenge stress and hindrance stress and employees' self-efficacy and creativity. We also examined whether these relations were moderated by distributive justice and procedure justice.
Data were collected from 256 dyads of employees and their immediate supervisors in two divisions of a large enterprise. The questionnaire for employee in Time 1 included challenge stress and hindrance stress, job complexity, and demography variables. The questionnaire for employee in Time 2 included self-efficacy. Employees' creativity was rated by their immediate supervisors in Time 3. Theoretical hypotheses were tested by hierarchal regression analysis with Mplus 6.0. Results of analyzing the matched sample showed that the relationships between challenge stress and both self-efficacy and creativity were not significant, and the relationship between hindrance stress and both self-efficacy and creativity was negative; where distributive justice was high, challenge stress was positively related to creativity via self-efficacy, whereas where distributive justice was low, this indirect relationship was not significant. The moderating effects of procedure justice on the relationship between hindrance stress and both self-efficacy and creativity were not significant.
Extending previous studies, this research demonstrated that challenge stress and hindrance stress have unique influences on self-efficacy and creativity, the results clarified the relationship between stress and creativity in workplace from a new perspective. Second, by examining the mediating effect of self-efficacy, the results contributed to our understanding on the mechanism through which stress influence creativity. Finally, through investigating the moderating effect of procedure justice and distributive justice, we confirmed that there are bounded conditions of the effect of stress on employee creativity. Findings broaden understandings of the process by which and the conditions under which challenge stress and hindrance stress influence creativity. Furthermore, the results also revealed that social cognitive theory was more suitable for explaining the relationship between stress and creativity.

Key words:creativity,challenge stress,hindrance stress,self-efficacy,distributive justice,procedure justice

ReleaseDate:2018-04-27 06:46:03



Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 267-299.

Amabile, T. M., Mueller, J. S., Simpson, W. B., Hadley, C. N., Kramer, S. J., & Fleming, L. (2002). Time pressure and creativity in organizations:A longitudinal field study. Harvard Business School Working Paper Series, No. 02-073.

Andrews, J., & Smith, D. C. (1996). In search of the marketing imagination:Factors affecting the creativity of marketing programs for mature products. Journal of Marketing Research, 33, 174-187.

Aryee, S., Zhou, Q., Sun, L. Y., & Lo, S. (2009). Perceptions of politics, intrinsic motivation and creative performance:Evidence from the service sector. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 1, 1-6.

Baer, M., & Oldham, G. R. (2006).The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity:Moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 963-970.

Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147.

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory:An agentic perspective. In S. T. Fiske, D. L. Schacter, & C. Zahn-Waxler (Eds.), Annual review of psychology (pp. 1-26). Palo Alto, CA:Annual Reviews.

Bunce, D., & West, M. (1994). Changing work environments:Innovative coping responses to occupational stress. Work & Stress, 8, 319-331.

Byron, K. Khazanchi, S., & Nazarian, D. (2010). The relationship between stressors and creativity:A meta-analysis examining competing theoretical models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 201-212.

Byron, K., Peterson, S. J., Zhang, Z., & LePine, J. A. (2016). Realizing challenges and guarding against threats:Interactive effects of regulatory focus and stress on performance. Journal of Management, 20, 1-27.

Cavanaugh, M. A., Boswell, W. R., Roehling, M. V., & Boudreau, J. W. (2000). An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among U.S. managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 65-74.

Colquitt, J. A., & Jackson, C. L. (2006). Justice in teams:The context sensitivity of justice rules across individual and team contexts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 868-899.

Colquitt, J. A., Noe, R. A., & Jackson, C. L. (2002). Justice in teams:Antecedents and consequences of procedural justice climate. Personnel Psychology, 55, 83-109.

Dewett, T. (2007). Linking intrinsic motivation, risk taking, and employee creativity in an R&D environment. R & D Management, 37, 197-208.

Dickerson, S. S., & Kemeny, M. E. (2004). Acute stressors and cortisol responses:A theoretical integration and synthesis of laboratory research. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 355-391.

Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation:A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12, 1-22.

Fay, D., & Sonnentag, S. (2002). Rethinking the effects of stressors:A longitudinal study on personal initiative. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 7, 221-234.

Folger, R., & Konovsky, M. A. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 115-130.

Ford, C. M. (1996). A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. The Academy of Management Review, 21, 1112-1142.

Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's Consequences:International Differences in Work Related Values. London:Sage.

Janssen, O. (2004). How fairness perceptions make innovative behavior more or less stressful. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 201-215.

Jex, S. M., Beehr, T. A., & Roberts, C. K. (1992). The meaning of occupational stress items to survey respondents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 623-628.

Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York:Springer.

LePine, J. A., LePine, M. A., & Jackson, C. L. (2004). Challenge and hindrance stress:Relationships with exhaustion, motivation to learn, and learning performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 883-891.

LePine, J. A., Podsakoff, N. P., & LePine, M. A. (2005). A meta-analytic test of the challenge stressor-hindrance stressor framework:An explanation for inconsistent relationships among stressors and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 764-775.

Liao, H., Liu, D., & Loi, R. (2010). Looking at both sides of the social exchange coin:A social cognitive perspective on the joint effects of relationship quality and differentiation on creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 1090-1109.

Liu, C., & Li, H. (2018). Stressors and stressor appraisals:The moderating effect of task efficacy. Journal of Business & Psychology, 33, 141-154.

Long, L. R., & Liu, Y. (2004). Review and comment on organizational injustice. Advances in Psychological Science, 12, 584-593.

[龙立荣, 刘亚. (2004). 组织不公正及其效果研究述评. 心理科学进展, 12, 584-593.]

March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York:Wiley.

Niehoff, B. P., & Moorman, R. H. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 527-556.

Oldham, G. R., Cummings, A., Mischel, L. J., Schmidtke, J. M., & Zhou, J. (1995). Listen while you work? Quasi-experimental relations between personal-stereo headset use and employee work responses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 547-564.

Pillai, R., Williams, E. S., & Tan, J. J. (2001). Are the scales tipped in favor of procedural or distributive justice? An investigation of the U.S., India, Germany, and Hong Kong (China). International Journal of Conflict Management, 12, 312-332.

Podsakoff, N. P., LePine, J. A., & LePine, M. A. (2007). Differential challenge stressor-hindrance stressor relationships with job attitudes, turnover intentions, turnover, and withdrawal behavior:A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 438-454.

Prem, R., Ohly, S., Kubicek, B., & Korunka, C. (2017). Thriving on challenge stressors? Exploring time pressure and learning demands as antecedents of thriving at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38, 108-123.

Probst, T. M., Stewart, S. M., Gruys, M. L., & Tierney, B. W. (2007). Productivity, counterproductivity and creativity:The ups and downs of job insecurity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80, 479-497.

Rodell, J. B., & Judge, T. A. (2009). Can "good" stressors spark "bad" behaviors? The mediating role of emotions in links of challenge and hindrance stressors with citizenship and counterproductive behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1438-1451.

Sacramento, C. A., Fay, D., & West, M. A. (2013). Workplace duties or opportunities? Challenge stressors, regulatory focus, and creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 121, 141-157.

Schaubroeck, J., Cotton, J. L., & Jennings, K. R. (1989). Antecedents and consequences of role stress:A covariance structure analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 10, 35-58.

Selye, H. (1982). History and present status of the stress concept. In L. Goldberger & S. Breznitz (Eds.), Handbook of stress (pp. 7-17). New York:Free Press.

Shah, J., Higgins, E. T., & Friedman, R. S. (1998). Performance incentives and means:How regulatory focus influences goal attainment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 285-293.

Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy:Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1137-1148.

Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice:A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.

Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 115-191). New York:Academic Press.

Vecchio, R. P. (1990). Theoretical and empirical examination of cognitive resource theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 141-147.

Wen, Z. L., Fan, X. T., Ye, B. J., & Chen, Y. S. (2016). Characteristics of an effect size and appropriateness of mediation effect size measures revisited. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 48, 435-443.

[温忠麟, 范息涛, 叶宝娟, 陈宇帅. (2016). 从效应量应有的性质看中介效应量的合理性. 心理学报, 48, 435-443.]

Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18, 293-321.

Xie, J. L., Schaubroeck, J., & Lam, S. S. K. (2008). Theories of job stress and the role of traditional values:A longitudinal study in China. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 831-848.

Zhang, Y. W., Lepine, J. A., Buckman, B. R., & Wei, F. (2014). It's not fair...Or is it? The role of justice and leadership in explaining work stressor-job performance relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 675-697.