doi:

DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00572

Acta Psychologica Sinica (心理学报) 2018/50:5 PP.572-582

Questioning the Rice Theory: Also on the internal and external causes of Chinese preference for holistic thinking


Abstract:
Based on the significant differences between rice and wheat cultivation, Talhelm et al. (2014) divided the Chinese culture into two types, respectively:rice culture and wheat culture. The former is closer to East Asian culture, and the latter to Western culture. Although the "Rice Theory" provides a novel perspective, it remains to be tested before it's established. For example, why is holistic-thinking prevalent in China? The "Rice Theory" argues that agricultural types result into cultural differences. Specifically, a long history of rice cultivation should make people live in the rice area more interdependent and thus prefer holistic-thinking, while that of wheat cultivation should make people live in the wheat area more individualistic and thus prefer analytical-thinking. Although the "Rice Theory" provides a new perspective in explaining the differences between rice culture and wheat culture and the prevalence of holistic-thinking in China, the real reason for Chinese, especially ancient Chinese, preferring holistic-thinking may not be a long history of rice cultivation. This paper focuses on explaining this new theory in details.
Two contradictions come out when explaining Chinese preference for holistic-thinking by the "Rice Theory". (1) Before the Southern Sung Dynasty (1127-1279), the majority of Chinese, who lived in wheat-growing area for a long time, used holistic-thinking, barely with any analytic-thinking. Moreover, the holistic-thinking had already reached a high degree no later than the Chhun Chhiu and Warring States Period (770-221 BC). (2) There is no firm evidence insofar to support that the wheat-growing northern Chinese are more culturally Western, no sufficient evidence to support that northerners were more analytical than southerners, or southerners were more holistic than northerners. In fact, northerners are also good at holistic-thinking. The founders and main representatives of "the hundred schools of thought" in pre-Qin period, who have largely influenced Chinese culture and holistic-thinking mode after the Qin and Han dynasties (221-220 BC), were mostly from the northern wheat region. Overall, these two contradictions suggested that the "Rice Theory" was invalid.
The external reasons for the prevalence of holistic-thinking in China is probably the enlightenments and inspirations derived from flood control practices, especially the contrast between Yu's success and Gun's failure in flood control, which made the Chinese ancients intuitively realized the importance of the harmony between man and nature, and thus considering beings comprehensively (the prototype of holistic-thinking) in solving complicated problems. And the internal reasons is probably the proposal and acceptance of the Yin-Yang theory which contains the thought of Yin-Yang, the Five Elements theory which contains the thought of Five Elements, and the combined Yin Yang-Five Elements theory which contains the thought of Yin-Yang and Five Elements. They provide a complete set of thinking methods to utilize the holistic-thinking for Chinese. Due to the logical and systematic explaining of the birth, growing, sickness and death of the universe, these theories were regarded the rule of thinking by ancient Chinese. They also promoted ancient Chinese to use the holistic, dynamic, and self-adaptive thinking model to explain manifold natural and social phenomena.
To sum up, (1) the "Rice Theory" is invalid to explain preference of holistic thinking among Chinese, due to its lack of cultural and ecological validity. (2) It is the flood control practice together with the Yin-Yang thinking, Five Elements thinking, and combined Yin Yang-Five Elements theory that lead to the holistic thinking of ancients Chinese. Insofar, the habit of using holistic thinking to understand and solve problems by Chinese is indestructible.

Key words:holistic-thinking,Rice Theory,flood control,Yin-Yang theory,Five Elements theory,Yin-Yang and Five Elements theory

ReleaseDate:2018-07-02 16:16:03



Boorstin, D. J. (1992). The creators:A history of heroes of the imagination. New York:Random House, Inc.

Chen, G. Y. (2009). Lao Tzu Zhu (Revised Edition). Beijing, China:Zhonghua Book Company.[陈鼓应. (2009). 老子注译及评介(修订增补本). 北京:中华书局.]

Duan, W. W. (2007). On holism:Reflections on philosophy and science. Journal of Renmin University of China, (3), 1.[段伟文. (2007). 整体论研究:哲学与科学的反思. 中国人民大学学报, (3), 1.]

Fan, H. (2009). Ethics and Morality in China:The current situation and an analysis in terms of philosophy of mind. Social Sciences in China, (4), 27-42.[樊浩. (2009). 当前中国伦理道德状况及其精神哲学分析. 中国社会科学, (4), 27-42.]

Fei, X. T. (1998). From the soil:The foundations of Chinese society. Beijing, China:Peking University Press.[费孝通. (1998). 乡土中国. 北京:北京大学出版社.]

Ge, J. X. (2013). Unity and division:The enlightenment of Chinese history. Beijing, China:The Commercial Press.[葛剑雄. (2013). 统一与分裂:中国历史的启示. 北京:商务印书馆.]

Gu, J. G. (1982). Politics and history under the theory of Five Phases. In Debate on ancient history (the fifth) Volume Ⅱ. Shanghai, China:Shanghai Guji Publishing House.[顾颉刚. (1982). 五德终始说下的政治和历史. 见 古史辨(五)下编. 上海:上海古籍出版社.]

Guan, Y. P. (2001). Comments on scientific value of the thinking mode of Chinese Yin-Yang and Five Elements theories. Journal of Zhengzhou University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 34(4), 35-38.[关煜平. (2001). 简评中国古代阴阳五行思维模式的双重价值. 郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 34(4), 35-38.]

He, F., Li, K., & Liu, H. (2010). The influence of historical climate change on agriculture in ancient China. Geographical Research, 29(12), 2289-2297.[何凡能, 李柯, 刘浩龙. (2010). 历史时期气候变化对中国古代农业影响研究的若干进展. 地理研究, 29(12), 2289-2297.]

Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61-83.

Hu, S. H., & Yuan, Z. G. (2015). Commentary:"Large-scale psychological differences within China explained by rice vs. wheat agriculture". Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 489.

Huang, J. (2007). Xiang Shuo Gu Wen Zheng Bao Da Quan. Changsha, China:Hunan Renming Publishing House[黄坚. (2007). 详说古文真宝大全(熊礼汇 点校). 长沙:湖南人民出版社.]

Li, X. Q. (1986). The silk book "Five Elements" and "Shang Shu-Hong Fan". Academic Monthly, (11), 37-40.[李学勤. (1986). 帛书〈五行〉与〈尚书·洪范〉.学术月刊, (11), 37-40.]

Liang, Q. C. (1921). The origin of Yin-Yang and Five Elements theory. Eastern Miscellan, 20(10), 70-79.[梁启超. (1921). 阴阳五行说之来历. 东方杂志, 20(10), 70-79.]

Liu, C. L. (1982). Philosophy and traditional Chinese Medicine in Neijing. Beijing, China:The Science Press.[刘长林. (1982). 内经的哲学和中医学的方法. 北京:科学出版社.]

Liu, C. H. (2002). Culture and personality:A comparison of cultural differences between China and the West. Hefei, China:University of Science and Technology of China.[刘承华. (2002). 文化与人格:对中西方文化差异的一次比较. 合肥:中国科学技术大学出版社.]

Liu, Q. Y. (1980). A study on the age of "Hong Fan". Social Sciences in China, (3), 155-170.[刘起釪. (1980). <洪范>成书时代考. 中国社会科学, (3), 155-170.]

Ma, X. R., Ren, X. P., & Xu, J. (2016). The difference of collectivism between north and south China and its cultural dynamics. Advances in Psychological Science, 24(10), 1551-1555.[马欣然, 任孝鹏, 徐江. (2016). 中国人集体主义的南北方差异及其文化动力. 心理科学进展, 24(10), 1551-1555.]

Needham, J. (1956). History of scientific thought. In Science and civilisation in China (Vol. 2). New York:Cambridge University Press.

Nisbett, R. E. (2003). The geography of thought:How Asians and westerners think differently... and why. New York:A Division of Simon & Schuster Inc.[理查德·尼斯贝特. (2010). 思维版图 (李秀霞 译) 北京:中信出版社.]

Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought:Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291-310.

Roberts, S. G. (2015). Commentary:Large-scale psychological differences within China explained by rice vs. wheat agriculture. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 950.

Ruan, J. Q., Xie, Z., & Zhang, X. B. (2015). Does rice farming shape individualism and innovation? Food Policy, 56, 51-58.

Si, M. Q. (2005). The records of the historian. Beijing, China:Zhonghua Book Company.[司马迁. (2005). 史记. 北京:中华书局.]

Song, J. (1996-05-21). Transcend Suspecting to the past and get out of confusion. Guangming Daily, p5.[宋健. (1996-05-21). 超越疑古 走出迷茫(1996年5月16日在夏商周断代工程会议的发言提纲). 光明日报, p5.]

Talhelm, T., Zhang, X., Oishi, S., Shimin, C., Duan, D., Lan, X., & Kitayama, S. (2014). Large-scale psychological differences within China explained by rice versus wheat agriculture. Science, 344, 603-608.

The Committee of Chinese Traditional Medicine of Encyclopedia of China. (1992). Encyclopedia of China-Chinese traditional medicine. Shanghai, China:China Encyclopedia Publishing House.[中国大百科全书总编辑委员会《中国传统医学》编辑委员会. (1992). 中国大百科全书·中国传统医学. 上海:中国大百科全书出版社.]

Wang, F. Y. (2017). On the mission of China's psychological studies in today's world. Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition), (4), 126-133.[汪凤炎. (2017). 论我国心理学研究的时代使命. 南京师范大学学报(社会科学版), (4), 126-133.]

Wang, F. Y., & Zheng, H. (2015). Chinese cultural psychology (5th ed.). Guangzhou, China:Ji'nan University Press.[汪凤炎, 郑红. (2015). 中国文化心理学 (第5版). 广州:暨南大学出版社.]

Wang, L. Q. (2009). Wen Zi Shu Yi (2nd ed.). Beijing, China:Zhonghua Book Company.[王利器. (2009). 文子疏義 (第2版). 北京:中华书局.]

Wang, S. S. (2012). Shang Shu. Beijing, China:Zhonghua Book Company.[王世舜. (2012). 尚书. 北京:中华书局.]

Wang, W. (2016-01-12). The silk road before the Han Dynasty-The early Eurasian cultural exchanges as seen from archaeological. Chinese Social Sciences Today, p4.[王巍. (2016-01-12). 汉代以前的丝绸之路——考古所见欧亚大陆早期文化交流. 中国社会科学报, p4.]

Wu, Q. L., Zhao, Z. J., Liu, L., Granger, D. E., Wang, H., Cohen, D. J., … Bai, S. B. (2016).Outburst flood at 1920 BCE supports historicity of China's Great Flood and the Xia dynasty. Science, 353(6299), 579-582.

Xia, Z. N., & Chen, Z. L. (2010). Cihai (6th ed., Compact Edition). Shanghai, China:Shanghai Lexicographic Publishing House.[夏征农, 陈至立. (2010). 辞海 (第六版缩印本). 上海:上海辞书出版社.]

Xu, F. G. (1961a). The evolution of the concept of Yin-Yang and Five Elements and the establish time and interpretation of relevant literature (1). Democratic Review, 12(19), 480-485.[徐复观. (1961a). 阴阳五行观念之演变及若干有关文献的成立时代与解释的问题(上). 民主评论, 12(19), 480-485.]

Xu, F. G. (1961b). The evolution of the concept of Yin-Yang and Five Elements and the establish time and interpretation of relevant literature (2). Democratic Review, 12(20), 504-509.[徐复观. (1961b). 阴阳五行观念之演变及若干有关文献的成立时代与解释的问题(中). 民主评论, 12(20), 504-509.]

Xu, F. G. (1961c). The evolution of the concept of Yin-Yang and Five Elements and the establish time and interpretation of relevant literature (3). Democratic Review, 12(21), 529-538.[徐复观. (1961c). 阴阳五行观念之演变及若干有关文献的成立时代与解释的问题(下). 民主评论, 12(21), 529-538.]

Xu, Y. G. (2002). Guo Yu Ji Jie. Beijing, China:Zhonghua Book Company.[徐元诰. (2002). 国语集解. 北京:中华书局.]

Yang, B. J. (1990). Chun Qiu Zuo Zhuan Zhu (Revised edition). Beijing, China:Zhonghua Book Company.[杨伯峻. (1990). 春秋左传注(修订本). 北京:中华书局.]

Yang, C. F. (2001). How to understand Chinese. Taibei, China:Yuan-Liou Publishing Co., Ltd.[杨中芳. (2001). 如何理解中国人-文化与个人论文集. 台北:远流出版事业股份有限公司.]

Yang, C. F. (2006). The Chinese conception of the self:Towards a person-making (做人) perspective. In U. Kim, K. S. Yang, & K. K. Hwang (Eds.), Indigenous and cultural psychology:Understanding people in context (pp. 327-356). New York:Springer.

Zhang, D. N., & Cheng, Z. Y. (1991). The tendency of Chinese thinking. Beijing, China:Publishing House of Chinese Social Sciences.[张岱年, 成中英. (1991). 中国思维偏向. 北京:中国社会科学出版社.]

Zhao, Z. J. (2011-05-10). Chinese rice-growing agriculture originated ten thousand years ago. Chinese Social Sciences Today, p5.[赵志军. (2011-05-10). 中国稻作农业源于一万年前. 中国社会科学报, p5.]

Zhou, Z. F. (1991). I Chang Yi Zhu. Beijing, China:Zhonghua Book Company.[周振甫. (1991). 周易译注. 北京:中华书局.]

Zhu, Y. (2014). Testing the rice theory. Journal of Psychological Science, 37(5), 1261-1262.[朱滢. (2014). 检验"水稻理论". 心理科学, 37(5), 1261-1262.]

Zhu, Y. (2015). Re-talk of the test of the rice theory. Psychological Research, 8(3), 3-4.[朱滢. (2015). 再谈检验"水稻理论". 心理研究, 8(3), 3-4.]