DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2020.00093
Acta Psychologica Sinica (心理学报) 2020/52:1 PP.93-106
Abstract：
Cognitive diagnostic assessments (CDAs) can provide fine-grained diagnostic information about students' knowledge states, so as to help to teach in accordance with the students' aptitude. The development of cognitive diagnosis model for polytomous response data expands the application scope of cognitive diagnostic assessment. As the basis of CDAs, Q-matrix has aroused more and more attention for the subjective tendency in Q-matrix construction that is typically performed by domain experts. Due to the subjective process of Q-matrix construction, there inevitably have some misspecifications in the Q-matrix, if left unchecked, can result in a serious negative impact on CDAs. To avoid the subjective tendency from experts and to improve the correctness of the Q-matrix, several objective Q-matrix validation methods have been proposed. Many Q-matrix validation methods have been proposed in dichotomous CDMs, however, the research of the Q-matrix validation method under polytomous CDMs is stalling lacking. To address this concern, several relative fit statistics (i.e., -2LL, AIC, BIC) were applied to the Q-matrix validation for polytomous cognitive diagnosis model in this research. The process of Q-matrix validation is as follows:
First, the reduced Q-matrix is represented by Q_{r}, which represents a set of potential q-vectors and contains 2^{K}-1 possible q-vectors when attributes are independent. When validating the q-vector of the first category of item j, all possible q-vectors in Q_{r} can be used as the q-vector of the first category of item j, and the Q-matrix of remaining items remains intact. From this, the item parameters and the attribute patterns of students can be estimated, and the -2LL, AIC, and BIC can be calculated accordingly. The q-vector with the largest likelihood (or smallest AIC/BIC) is regarded as the q-vector of the first category of item j. The q-vector of the next category of the item j can also be obtained in the same way. The algorithm stops when the validated Q-matrix is same as the previous Q-matrix, or every item has been reached. In order to improve the efficiency of the method, a sequential search algorithm was proposed.
Several simulation studies were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness and practicality of these methods, and the performance of the methods in this paper was compared with the stepwise method (Ma & de la Torre, 2019). Three experimental factors were considered in simulation studies, including sample size, Q-matrix error types and CDMs. The results show that (1) BIC method can be used for Q-matrix validation under polytomous response CDMs, and the performance of the BIC method is better than the stepwise method. (2) In general, the performance of the three methods from good to bad is the BIC method, AIC method, and -2LL method. (3) The performance of Q-matrix validation methods is affected by the sample size, and increasing the number of sample size can improve the accuracy of the Q-matrix validation.
In this study, Q-matrix validation methods for polytomous response CDMs were studied. It was found that the BIC method can be used for the Q-matrix validation under polytomous response CDMs. The method proposed in this paper can not only improve the accuracy of Q-matrix specification but also increase the model-data fit level. Besides, the data-based Q-matrix validation method can also reduce the workload of experts in Q-matrix construction and improve the classification accuracy of cognitive diagnosis.
ReleaseDate：2019-12-28 15:34:13
Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on AutomaticControl, 19(6), 716-723.
Chang, H.-H. (2015). Psychometrics behind computerized adaptive testing. Psychometrika, 80(1), 1-20.
Chang, H.-H., & Wang, W. Y. (2016). "Internet plus" measurement and evaluation:a new way for adaptive learning. Journal of Jiangxi Normal University (Natural Science), 40(5), 441-455.
[张华华, 汪文义. (2016). "互联网+"测评:自适应学习之路. 江西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 40(5), 441-455.]
Chen, J. S.(2017). A residual-based approach to validate Q-matrix specifications. Applied Psychological Measurement, 41(4), 277-293.
Chen, J., de la Torre, J. & Zhang, Z. (2013). Relative and absolute fit evaluation in cognitive diagnosis modeling. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50(2), 123-140.
Chiu, C.-Y. (2013). Statistical refinement of the Q-matrix in cognitive diagnosis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37(8), 598-618.
de la Torre, J. (2008). An empirically based method of Q-matrix validation for the DINA model:development and applications. Journal of Educational Measurement, 45(4), 343-362.
de la Torre, J. (2011). The generalized DINA model framework. Psychometrika, 76(2), 179-199.
de la Torre, J., & Chiu, C.-Y. (2016). A general method of empirical Q-matrix validation. Psychometrika, 81(2), 253-273.
Haertel, E.. (1984). An application of latent class models to assessment data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8(3), 333-346.
Hansen, M. (2013). Hierarchical item response models for cognitive diagnosis. unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of California at Los Angeles.
Hartz, S., & Roussos, L. (2008). The fusion model for skills diagnosis:blending theory with practicality. Educational Testing Service, Research Report, RR-08-71. Princeton, NJ:Educational Testing Service.
Lee, Y.-S., Park, Y. S., & Taylan, D. (2011). A cognitive diagnostic modeling of attribute mastery in massachusetts, minnesota, and the U.S. national sample using the TIMSS 2007. International Journal of Testing, 11(2), 144-177.
Liu, Y., Tian, W., & Xin, T. (2016). An application of M2 statistic to evaluate the fit of cognitive diagnostic models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 41(1), 3-26.
Liu, Y., Xin, T., Andersson, B. & Tian, W. (2019). Information matrix estimation procedures for cognitive diagnostic models. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(1), 18-37.
Ma, W., & de la Torre, J. (2016). A sequential cognitive diagnosis model for polytomous responses. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 69(3), 253-275.
Ma, W. & de la Torre, J. (2019). An empirical Q-matrix validation method for the sequential generalized DINA model. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12156.
Maris, E. (1999). Estimating multiple classification latent class models. Psychometrika, 64(2), 187-212.
Park, J. Y., Lee, Y.-S., & Johnson, M. S. (2017). An efficient standard error estimator of the DINA model parameters when analysing clustered data. International Journal of Quantitative Research in Education, 4(1/2), 159-190.
Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461-464.
Templin, J. L., & Henson, R. A. (2006). Measurement of psychological disorders using cognitive diagnosis models. Psychological Methods, 11(3), 287-305.
Tu, D.-B., Cai, Y., & Dai, H.-Q. (2012). A new method of Q-Matrix validation based on DINA model. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 44(4), 558-568.
[涂冬波, 蔡艳, 戴海琦. (2012). 基于DINA模型的Q矩阵修正方法. 心理学报, 44(4), 558-568.]
Tu, D.-B., Cai, Y., Dai, H.-Q., & Ding, S.-L. (2010). A polytomous cognitive diagnosis model:P-DINA model. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 42(10), 1011-1020.
[涂冬波, 蔡艳, 戴海琦, 丁树良. (2010). 一种多级评分的认知诊断模型:P-DINA模型的开发. 心理学报, 42(10), 1011-1020.]
von Davier, M. (2008). A general diagnostic model applied to language testing data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61(2), 287-307.
Wang, D.-X., Gao, X.-L., Cai, Y., & Tu, D.-B. (2018). A new Q-matrix estimation method:ICC based on ideal response. Journal of Psychological Science, 41(2), 466-474.
[汪大勋, 高旭亮, 蔡艳, 涂冬波. (2018). 一种非参数化的Q矩阵估计方法:ICC-IR方法开发. 心理科学, 41(2), 466-474.]
Wang, D.-X., Gao, X.-L., Han, Y.-T., & Tu, D.-B. (2018). A simple and effective Q-matrix estimation method:from non-parametric perspective. Journal of Psychological Science, 41(1), 180-188.
[汪大勋, 高旭亮, 韩雨婷, 涂冬波. (2018). 一种简单有效的Q矩阵估计方法开发:基于非参数化方法视角. 心理科学, 41(1), 180-188.]
Xu, G. & Shang, Z. (2018). Identifying latent structures in restricted latent class models. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2017.1340889.