doi:

DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1085.2013.00258

Advances in Polar Science 2013/24:4 PP.258-264

Ice concentration assimilation in a regional ice-ocean coupled model and its application in sea ice forecasting


Abstract:
A reasonable initial state of ice concentration is essential for accurate short-term forecasts of sea ice using ice-ocean coupled models.In this study,sea ice concentration data are assimilated into an operational ice forecast system based on a combined optimal interpolation and nudging scheme.The scheme produces a modeled sea ice concentration at every time step,based on the difference between observational and forecast data and on the ratio of observational error to modeled error.The impact and the effectiveness of data assimilation are investigated.Significant improvements to predictions of sea ice extent were obtained through the assimilation of ice concentration,and minor improvements through the adjustment of the upper ocean properties.The assimilation of ice thickness data did not significantly improve predictions.Forecast experiments show that the forecast accuracy is higher in summer,and that the errors on five-day forecasts occur mainly around the marginal ice zone.

Key words:ice concentration assimilation,combined optimal interpolation and nudging,sea ice forecast,skills core

ReleaseDate:2015-04-16 13:27:17



1 Comiso J C, Parkinson C L, Gersten R, et al. Accelerated decline in the Arctic sea ice cover. Geophys Res Lett, 2008, 35(L01703), doi: 10. 1029/2007GL031972.

2 Comiso J C. Large decadal decline of the arctic multiyear ice cover. J Climate, 2012, 25(4): 1176-1193.

3 ACIA. Impact of a warming Arctic: Arctic climate impact assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

4 Massonnet F, Fichefet T, Goosse H, et al. On the influence of model physics on simulations of Arctic and Antarctic sea ice. The Cryosphere,2011, 5(2): 1167-1200.

5 Mathiot P, Konig B, Fichefet T, et al. Better constraints on the sea-ice state using global sea-ice data assimilation. Geosc Model Devel Discus,2012, 5(2): 1627-1667.

6 Lis祀ter K, Rosanova J, Evensen G Assimilation of ice concentration in a coupled ice-ocean model, using the Ensemble Kalman filter. Ocean Dyn, 2003, 53(4): 368-388, doi: 10.1007/s10236-003-0049-4.

7 Lindsay R W, Zhang J. Assimilation of ice concentration in an ice-ocean model. J Atmos Oceanic Technol, 2006, 23(5): 742-749.

8 Wang K, Debernard J, Sperrevik A K, et al. A combined optimal rnterpo-lation and nudging scheme to assimilate OSISAF sea ice concentration into ROMS. Ann Glaciol, 2013, 64(62): 8-12.

9 Stark J D, Ridley J, Martin M, et al. Sea ice concentration and motion assimilation in a sea ice-ocean model. J Geophys Res, 2008, 113(C05S91), doi: 10.1029/2007JC004224.

10 Murphy A H. Skill scores based on the mean square error and their relationships to the correlation coefficient. Mon Wea Rev, 1988, 116(12): 2417-2424.

11 Menemenlis D, Campin J, Heimbach P, et al. ECCO2: High resolution global ocean and sea ice data synthesis. Mercator Ocean Quarterly Newsletter, 2008, 31: 13-21.

12 MITgcm-Group. MITgcm Release 1 Manual, Online documentation. Cambridge, USA: MIT/EAPS. 2002.

13 Hibler WD III. A dynamic thermodynamic sea ice model. J Phys Ocean-ogr, 1979, 9(4): 815-846.

14 Hibler WD III. Modeling a variable thickness sea ice cover. Mon Wea Rev, 1980, 108(12): 1943-1973.

15 Zhang J L, Rothrock D. A thickness and enthalpy distribution sea-ice model. J Phys Oceanogr, 2001, 31(10): 2986-3001.

16 Semtner A J Jr. A model for the thermodynamic growth of sea ice in numerical investigations of climate. J Phys Oceanogr, 1976, 6(3): 379-389.

17 Winton M. A reformulated three-layer sea ice model. J Atmos Oceanic Technol, 2000, 17(4): 525-531.

18 Maksym T, Jeffries M O. A one-dimensional percolation model of flooding and snow ice formation on Antarctic sea ice. J Geophys Res, 2000, 105(C11): 26313-26331.

19 Yang Q H, Liu J P, Zhang Z H, et al. A preliminary study of the arctic sea ice numerical forecasting: Coupled sea ice-ocean modeling experiments based on MITgcm. Chinese J Atmos Sci, 2011, 35(3): 473-482.

20 Nguyen A T, Menemenlis D, Kwok R. Arctic ice-ocean simulation with optimized model parameters: Approach and assessment. J Geophys Res, 2011, 116(C04025), doi: 10.1029/2010JC006573.

21 Deutsch R. Estimation Theory. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1965.

22 Rothrock D A, Percival D B, Wensnahan M. The decline in arctic sea-ice thickness: Separating the spatial, annual, and interannual variability in a quarter century of submarine data. J Geophys Res, 2008, 113(C05003), doi: 10.1029/2007JC004252.

23 Johnson M, Proshutinsky A, Aksenov Y, et al. Evaluation of Arctic sea ice thickness simulated by Arctic Ocean Model Intercomparison Project models. J Geophys Res, 2012, 117(C00D13), doi: 10.1029/2011JC 007257.

24 Kwok R, Rothrock D A. Decline in Arctic sea ice thickness from submarine and ICESat records: 1958-2008. Geophys Res Lett, 2009, 36(L15501), doi: 10.1029/2009GL039035.

25 Schweiger A, Lindsay R, Zhang J L, et al. Uncertainty in modeled Arctic sea ice volume. J Geophys Res, 2011, 116(C00D06), doi: 10.1029/2011 JC007084.

26 Preller R H, Posey P G, Maslowski W, et al. Navy sea ice prediction system. Oceanography, 2002, 15(1): 44-56.