doi:

DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.00120

Advances in Psychological Science (心理科学进展) 2016/24:1 PP.120-131

Power and prosocial behaviour: How and why power affects prosocial behaviour


Abstract:
Power is an asymmetric control over valued resources. The effects of power on individuals' prosocial behaviours depend on active goals. And both selective attention and social distance mediate this moderating process of power, active goals and prosocial behaviours. Prosocial behaviours could be promoted by increasing high-power individuals' prosocial goals from personal, institutional and cultural levels. Future studies are required to explore the effects of different power types, power and status, and culture on the relationship of power and prosocial behaviour, as well as the effects of group power on intergroup prosocial behaviours.

Key words:power,prosocial behaviour,selective attention,social distance,active goals

ReleaseDate:2016-12-19 16:07:45



寇彧, 付艳, 马艳. (2004). 初中生认同的亲社会行为的初步研究. 心理发展与教育, (4), 43-48.

寇彧, 付艳, 张庆鹏. (2007). 青少年认同的亲社会行为: 一项焦点群体访谈研究. 社会学研究, (3), 154-173.

谭洁, 郑全全. (2010). 目标追求过程中的权力效应. 心理科学进展, 18, 1782-1788.

王雪, 蔡頠, 孙嘉卿, 吴嵩, 封子奇, 金盛华. (2014). 社会心理学视角下权力理论的发展与比较. 心理科学进展, 22, 139-149, doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.00139.

韦庆旺, 俞国良. (2009). 权力的社会认知研究述评. 心理科学进展, 17, 1336-1343.

韦庆旺, 俞国良. (2010). 问责: 社会心理学不可忽视的概念. 黑龙江社会科学, (3), 133-136.

魏秋江, 段锦云, 范庭卫. (2012). 权力操作范式的分析与比较. 心理科学进展, 20, 1507-1518, doi: 10.3724/SP.J. 1042.2012.01507.

张兰鸽, 王磊, 张应兰, 寇彧. (2015). 自主定向与依赖定向的群际帮助在动机与后果上的差异. 心理科学进展, 23: 1658-1667, doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2015.01658.

Agerström, J., & Björklund, F. (2013). Why people with an eye toward the future are more moral: The role of abstract thinking. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 35, 373-381, doi: 10.1080/01973533.2013.803967.

Anderson, C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2006). Power, optimism, and risk-taking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 511-536, doi: 10.1002/ejsp.324.

Anderson, C., Hildreth, J. A. D., & Howland, L. (2015). Is the desire for status a fundamental human motive? A review of the empirical literature. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 574-601, doi: 10.1037/a0038781.

Bargh, J. A., Raymond, P., Pryor, J. B., & Strack, F. (1995). Attractiveness of the underling: An automatic power→sex association and its consequences for sexual harassment and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 768-781, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.68.5.768.

Batson, C. D., van Lange, P. A. M., Ahmad, N., & Lishner, D. A. (2003). Altruism and helping behavior. In M. A. Hogg & J. Cooper (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social psychology (pp. 279-295). London, England: Sage.

Bell, C. M., & Hughes-Jones, J. (2008). Power, self-regulation and the moralization of behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 503-514, doi: 10.1007/s10551-007-9635-6.

Boehm, C., & Flack, J. C. (2010). The emergence of simple and complex power structures through social niche construction. In A. Guinote & T. K. Vescio (Eds.), The social psychology of power (pp. 46-86). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Caprara, G. V., Alessandri, G., & Eisenberg, N. (2012). Prosociality: The contribution of traits, values, and self-efficacy beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1289-1303, doi: 10.1037/a0025626.

Cartwright, D. (1959). Power: A neglected variable in social psychology. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 1-14). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.

Chen, S., Lee-Chai, A. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (2001). Relationship orientation as a moderator of the effects of social power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 173-187, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.2.173.

Chiu, C.-Y., & Hong, Y.-Y. (2006). Social psychology of culture. New York, NY: Psychology Press.

Côté, S., Kraus, M. W., Cheng, B. H., Oveis, C., van der Löwe, I., Lian, H., & Keltner, D. (2011). Social power facilitates the effect of prosocial orientation on empathic accuracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 217-232, doi: 10.1037/a0023171.

de Cremer, D., & van Dijk, E. (2008). Leader—follower effects in resource dilemmas: The roles of leadership selection and social responsibility. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 11, 355-369, doi: 10.1177/1368430208090647.

de Dreu, C. K. W., & van Kleef, G. A. (2004). The influence of power on the information search, impression formation, and demands in negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 303-319, doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2003.07.004.

de Vries, R. E. (2012). Personality predictors of leadership styles and the self-other agreement problem. The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 809-821, doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.03.002.

DeCelles, K. A., DeRue, D. S., Margolis, J. D., & Ceranic, T. L. (2012). Does power corrupt or enable? When and why power facilitates self-interested behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 681-689, doi: 10.1037/a0026811.

Dépret, E., & Fiske, S. T. (1999). Perceiving the powerful: Intriguing individuals versus threatening groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 461-480, doi: 10.1006/jesp.1999.1380.

Dubois, D., Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2015). Social class, power, and selfishness: When and why upper and lower class individuals behave unethically. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 436-449, doi: 10.1037/pspi0000008.

Eagly, A. H. (2009). The his and hers of prosocial behavior: An examination of the social psychology of gender. American Psychologist, 64, 644-658, doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.64.8.644.

Earle, W. B., Giuliano, T., & Archer, R. L. (1983). Lonely at the top: The effect of power on information flow in the dyad. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 629-637, doi: 10.1177/0146167283094012.

Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Spinrad, T. L. (2006). Prosocial development. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., Vol. 3, pp. 646-718). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Eyal, T., & Liberman, N. (2012). Morality and psychological distance: A construal level theory perspective. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil (pp. 185-202). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Fiske, S. T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48, 621-628, doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.48.6.621.

Fiske, S. T., & Dépret, E. (1996). Control, interdependence and power: Understanding social cognition in its social context. European Review of Social Psychology, 7, 31-61, doi: 10.1080/14792779443000094.

Gable, P. A., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2008). Approach-motivated positive affect reduces breadth of attention. Psychological Science, 19, 476-482, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008. 02112.x.

Gable, P. A., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2010). The motivational dimensional model of affect: Implications for breadth of attention, memory, and cognitive categorisation. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 322-337, doi: 10.1080/02699930903378 305.

Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Inesi, M. E., & Gruenfeld, D. H. (2006). Power and perspectives not taken. Psychological Science, 17, 1068-1074, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01824.x.

Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Rus, D., Rothman, N. B., & Todd, A. R. (2014). Acceleration with steering: The synergistic benefits of combining power and perspective-taking. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 627-635, doi: 10.1177/1948550613519685.

Galinsky, A. D., Rus, D., & Lammers, J. (2011). Power: A central force governing psychological, social, and organizational life. In D. de Cremer, R. van Dick, & J. K. Murnighan (Eds.), Social psychology and organizations (pp. 17-38). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Goodwin, S. A., Gubin, A., Fiske, S. T., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2000). Power can bias impression processes: Stereotyping subordinates by default and by design. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 3, 227-256, doi: 10.1177/136843 0200003003001.

Gordon, A. M., & Chen, S. (2013). Does power help or hurt? The moderating role of self-other focus on power and perspective-taking in romantic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1097-1110, doi: 10.1177/0146167213490031.

Graziano, W. G., Habashi, M. M., Sheese, B. E., & Tobin, R. M. (2007). Agreeableness, empathy, and helping: A person× situation perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 583-599, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.583.

Greenberg, J. (1978). Effects of reward value and retaliative power on allocation decisions: Justice, generosity, or greed? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 367-379, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.36.4.367.

Gruenfeld, D. H., Inesi, M. E., Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Power and the objectification of social targets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 111-127, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.111.

Guinote, A. (2007a). Behaviour variability and the situated focus theory of power. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 256-295, doi: 10.1080/10463280701692813.

Guinote, A. (2007b). Power affects basic cognition: Increased attentional inhibition and flexibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 685-697, doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2006.06.008.

Guinote, A. (2007c). Power and goal pursuit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1076-1087, doi: 10.1177/0146167207301011.

Guinote, A. (2008). Power and affordances: When the situation has more power over powerful than powerless individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 237-252, doi: 10.1037/a0012518.

Guinote, A. (2010). The situated focus theory of power. In A. Guinote & T. K. Vescio (Eds.), The social psychology of power (pp. 141-173): New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Guinote, A. (2013). Social power and cognition. In D. Carlston (Ed.), The oxford handbook of social cognition (pp. 575-589). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Gwinn, J. D., Judd, C. M., & Park, B. (2013). Less power = less human? Effects of power differentials on dehumanization. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 464-470, doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.01.005.

Handgraaf, M. J. J., van Dijk, E., Vermunt, R. C., Wilke, H. A. M., & de Dreu, C. K. W. (2008). Less power or powerless? Egocentric empathy gaps and the irony of having little versus no power in social decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1136-1149, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1136.

Hays, N. A. (2013). Fear and loving in social hierarchy: Sex differences in preferences for power versus status. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 1130-1136, doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.08.007.

Hirsh, J. B., Galinsky, A. D., & Zhong, C. B. (2011). Drunk, powerful, and in the dark: How general processes of disinhibition produce both prosocial and antisocial behavior. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 415-427, doi: 10.1177/1745691611416992.

Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values (Vol. 5). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Inesi, M. E., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Galinsky, A. D. (2012). How power corrupts relationships: Cynical attributions for others' generous acts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 795-803, doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.01.008.

Karremans, J. C., & Smith, P. K. (2010). Having the power to forgive: When the experience of power increases interpersonal forgiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1010-1023, doi: 10.1177/0146167210376761.

Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265-284, doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.110.2.265.

Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., Galinsky, A., & Kraus, M. W. (2010). Paradoxes of power: Dynamics of the acquisition, experience, and social regulation of social power. In A. Guinote & T. K. Vescio (Eds.), The social psychology of power (pp. 177-208). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Kipnis, D. (1972). Does power corrupt? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 33-41, doi: 10.1037/h0033390.

Kipnis, D., Castell, J., Gergen, M., & Mauch, D. (1976). Metamorphic effects of power. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 127-135, doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.61.2.127.

Kipnis, D., & Cosentino, J. (1969). Use of leadership powers in industry. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 460-466, doi: 10.1037/h0028668.

Kraus, M. W., Chen, S., & Keltner, D. (2011). The power to be me: Power elevates self-concept consistency and authenticity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 974-980, doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.017.

Lammers, J., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009). The conceptualization of power and the nature of interdependency: The role of legitimacy and culture. In D. Tjosvold & B. Wisse (Eds.), Power and interdependence in organizations (pp. 67-82). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Lammers, J., Galinsky, A. D., Gordijn, E. H., & Otten, S. (2008). Illegitimacy moderates the effects of power on approach. Psychological Science, 19, 558-564, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02123.x.

Lammers, J., Galinsky, A. D., Gordijn, E. H., & Otten, S. (2012). Power increases social distance. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 282-290, doi: 10.1177/1948550611418679.

Lammers, J., & Stapel, D. A. (2011). Power increases dehumanization. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14, 113-126, doi: 10.1177/1368430210370042.

Lammers, J., Stapel, D. A., & Galinsky, A. D. (2010). Power increases hypocrisy: Moralizing in reasoning, immorality in behavior. Psychological Science, 21, 737-744, doi: 10.1177/0956797610368810.

Lammers, J., Stoker, J. I., & Stapel, D. A. (2009). Differentiating social and personal power: Opposite effects on stereotyping, but parallel effects on behavioral approach tendencies. Psychological Science, 20, 1543-1548, doi: 10.1111/ j.1467-9280.2009.02479.x.

Lee, F., & Tiedens, L. Z. (2001). Is it lonely at the top?: The independence and interdependence of power holders. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 43-91, doi: 10.1016/S0191-3085(01)23003-2.

Lerner, J. S., & Tetlock, P. E. (1999). Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 255-275, doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.255.

Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. The Academy of Management Annals, 2, 351-398, doi: 10.1080/19416520802211628.

Magee, J. C., & Langner, C. A. (2008). How personalized and socialized power motivation facilitate antisocial and prosocial decision-making. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1547-1559, doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2008.07.009.

Magee, J. C., & Smith, P. K. (2013). The social distance theory of power. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 158-186, doi: 10.1177/1088868312472732.

Maner, J. K., Gailliot, M. T., Butz, D. A., & Peruche, B. M. (2007). Power, risk, and the status quo: Does power promote riskier or more conservative decision making? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(4), 451-462, doi: 10.1177/0146167206297405.

Mitchell, T. R., Hopper, H., Daniels, D., Falvy, J. G., & Ferris, G. R. (1998). Power, accountability, and inappropriate actions. Applied Psychology, 47, 497-517, doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.1998.tb00040.x.

Nadler, A. (2002). Inter-group helping relations as power relations: Maintaining or challenging social dominance between groups through helping. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 487-502, doi: 10.1111/1540-4560.00272.

Nadler, A., & Chernyak-Hai, L. (2014). Helping them stay where they are: Status effects on dependency/autonomy- oriented helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 58-72, doi: 10.1037/a0034152.

Overbeck, J. R., & Droutman, V. (2013). One for all: Social power increases self-anchoring of traits, attitudes, and emotions. Psychological Science, 24, 1466-1476, doi: 10.1177/0956797612474671.

Overbeck, J. R., & Park, B. (2001). When power does not corrupt: Superior individuation processes among powerful perceivers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 549-565, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.4.549.

Overbeck, J. R., & Park, B. (2006). Powerful perceivers, powerless objects: Flexibility of powerholders' social attention. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99, 227-243, doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.10.003.

Penner, L. A., Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., & Schroeder, D. A. (2005). Prosocial behavior: Multilevel perspectives. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 365-392, doi: 10.1146/ annurev.psych.56.091103.070141.

Pitesa, M., & Thau, S. (2013). Masters of the universe: How power and accountability influence self-serving decisions under moral hazard. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 550-558, doi: 10.1037/a0031697.

Rhee, E., Uleman, J. S., Lee, H. K., & Roman, R. J. (1995). Spontaneous self-descriptions and ethnic identities in individualistic and collectivistic cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 142-152, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.1.142.

Rucker, D. D., Dubois, D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2011). Generous paupers and stingy princes: Power drives consumer spending on self versus others. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 1015-1015, doi: 10.1086/657162.

Rus, D., van Knippenberg, D., & Wisse, B. (2010). Leader power and leader self-serving behavior: The role of effective leadership beliefs and performance information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 922-933, doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.06.007.

Rus, D., van Knippenberg, D., & Wisse, B. (2012). Leader power and self-serving behavior: The moderating role of accountability. The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 13-26, doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.11.002.

Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1977). Who gets power — and how they hold on to it: A strategic-contingency model of power. Organizational Dynamics, 5(3), 3-21, doi: 10.1016/0090-2616(77)90028-6.

Siegel-Jacobs, K., & Yates, J. F. (1996). Effects of procedural and outcome accountability on judgment quality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 1-17, doi: 10.1006/obhd.1996.0001.

Singh, S., & Teoh, V. Y. (2014). Enhancing pro-social behavior among college students: Exploring the role of abstract mindset. Journal of Law and Social Sciences, 3(2), 28-32, doi: 10.5176/2251-2853_3.2.154.

Small, D. A., & Loewenstein, G. (2003). Helping a victim or helping the victim: Altruism and identifiability. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 26, 5-16, doi: 10.1023/A:1022299422 219.

Smith, P. K., & Trope, Y. (2006). You focus on the forest when you're in charge of the trees: Power priming and abstract information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 578-596, doi: 10.1037/ 0022-3514.90.4.578.

Snyder, C. R., & Fromkin, H. L. (1980). Uniqueness: The human pursuit of difference. New York, NY: Plenum Press.

Tetlock, P. E. (1983). Accountability and complexity of thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 74-83, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.45.1.74.

Tetlock, P. E., & Kim, J. I. (1987). Accountability and judgment processes in a personality prediction task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 700-709, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.52.4.700.

Thau, S., Derfler-Rozin, R., Pitesa, M., Mitchell, M. S., & Pillutla, M. M. (2014). Unethical for the sake of the group: Risk of social exclusion and pro-group unethical behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 98-113, doi: 10.1037/a0036708.

Tjosvold, D. (1985). Power and social context in superior- subordinate interaction. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 281-293, doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(85)90025-1.

Tjosvold, D., & Sagaria, S. D. (1978). Effects of relative power on cognitive perspective-taking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 256-259, doi: 10.1177/014616727800400217.

Torelli, C. J., & Shavitt, S. (2010). Culture and concepts of power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 703-723, doi: 10.1037/a0019973.

Tost, L. P., Wade-Benzoni, K. A., & Johnson, H. H. (2015). Noblesse oblige emerges (with time): Power enhances intergenerational beneficence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 128, 61-73, doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.03.003.

van Kleef, G. A., de Dreu, C. K. W., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2004). The interpersonal effects of anger and happiness in negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 57-76, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.57.

van Kleef, G. A., de Dreu, C. K. W., Pietroni, D., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2006). Power and emotion in negotiation: Power moderates the interpersonal effects of anger and happiness on concession making. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 557-581, doi: 10.1002/ejsp.320.

Vescio, T. K., & Guinote, A. (2010). Power: New understandings and future directions. In A. Guinote & T. K. Vescio (Eds.), The social psychology of power (pp. 428-454). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Vescio, T. K., Sechrist, G. B., & Paolucci, M. P. (2003). Perspective taking and prejudice reduction: The mediational role of empathy arousal and situational attributions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 455-472, doi: 10.1002/ejsp.163.

Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization (A. M. Henderson & T. Parsons, Trans.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1915)

Whitson, J. A., Liljenquist, K. A., Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Cadena, B. (2013). The blind leading: Power reduces awareness of constraints. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 579-582, doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.10.009.

Willer, D., Lovaglia, M. J., & Markovsky, B. (1997). Power and influence: A theoretical bridge. Social Forces, 76, 571-603, doi: 10.1093/sf/76.2.571.

Williams, M. J. (2014). Serving the self from the seat of power: Goals and threats predict leaders' self-interested behavior. Journal of Management, 40, 1365-1395, doi: 10.1177/0149206314525203.

Winter, D. G. (1973). The power motive. New York, NY: Free Press.

Zhong, C. B., Magee, J. C., Maddux, W. W., & Galinsky, A. D. (2006). Power, culture, and action: Considerations in the expression and enactment of power in east asian and western societies. In E. A. Mannix, M. A. Neale, & Y. Chen (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams (Vol. 9, pp. 53-73). Greenwich, CT: Elsevier Science Press.