doi:

DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2017.00404

Advances in Psychological Science (心理科学进展) 2017/25:3 PP.404-412

How do readers select the saccade targets?


Abstract:
How do readers select a landing position when they make a saccade is an interesting and important question in cognitive psychology research. For alphabetic languages (i.e., English and German) which use blank spaces to segment words, readers usually make saccades to the preferred viewing location (PVL), which is usually slightly to the left of the center of a word. For non-alphabetic languages like Chinese, however, the absence of obvious visual cues between words makes the selection of a landing position more complex. Recently, researchers have studied saccade target selection from the perspective of dynamic saccade adjustment based on foveal-parafoveal processing. They found that saccade lengths are influenced by the demands of on-going foveal and parafoveal processing. Moreover, the processing of parafoveal information directly determines the saccade lengths. However, more efforts are needed to understand precisely how saccade length is adjusted to accommodate foveal and parafoveal processing demands during the reading of both alphabetic and non-alphabetic languages.

Key words:saccade target selection,foveal-parafoveal processing,Chinese reading

ReleaseDate:2017-04-10 17:44:39



白学军, 李馨, 闫国利. (2015). 汉语阅读眼动控制:20年研究的总结. 心理发展与教育, 31, 85-91.

白学军, 孟红霞, 王敬欣, 田静, 臧传丽, 闫国利. (2011). 阅读障碍儿童与其年龄和能力匹配儿童阅读空格文本的注视位置效应. 心理学报, 43, 851-862.

李兴珊, 刘萍萍, 马国杰. (2011). 中文阅读中词切分的认知机理述评. 心理科学进展, 19, 459-470.

孟红霞. (2012). 中文阅读中注视位置效应研究(博士学位论文). 天津师范大学.

闫国利, 熊建萍, 臧传丽, 余莉莉, 崔磊, 白学军. (2013). 阅读研究中的主要眼动指标评述. 心理科学进展, 21, 589-605.

臧传丽, 孟红霞, 白学军, 闫国利. (2013). 阅读过程中的注视位置效应. 心理科学, 36(4), 770-775.

Chen, Q. R., Gu, W. T., & Scheepers, C. (2016). Effects of text segmentation on silent reading of Chinese regulated poems:Evidence from eye movements. The Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 44, 265-286.

Coëffé, C., & O'Regan, J. K. (1987). Reducing the influence of non-target stimuli on saccade accuracy:Predictability and latency effects. Vision Research, 27(2), 227-240.

Engbert, R., Longtin, A., & Kliegl, R. (2002). A dynamical model of saccade generation in reading based on spatially distributed lexical processing. Vision Research, 42(5), 621-636.

Fernández, G., Schumacher, M., Castro, L., Orozco, D., & Agamennoni, O. (2015). Patients with mild Alzheimer's disease produced shorter outgoing saccades when reading sentences. Psychiatry Research, 229(1-2), 470-478.

Hyönä, J., & Pollatsek, A. (1998). Reading Finnish compound words:Eye fixations are affected by component morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 24(6), 1612-1627.

Inhoff, A., Eiter, B., Radach, R., & Juhasz, B. (2003). Distinct subsystems for the parafoveal processing of spatial and linguistic information during eye fixations in reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 56(5), 803-827.

Inhoff, A. W., & Rayner, K. (1986). Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading:Effects of word frequency. Perception & Psychophysics, 40(6), 431-439.

Joseph, H. S. S. L., Liversedge, S. P., Blythe, H. I., White, S. J., & Rayner, K. (2009). Word length and landing position effects during reading in children and adults. Vision Research, 49(16), 2078-2086.

Juhasz, B. J., White, S. J., Liversedge, S. P., & Rayner, K. (2008). Eye movements and the use of parafoveal word length information in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 34(6), 1560-1579.

Lavigne, F., Vitu, F., & d'Ydewalle, G. (2000). The influence of semantic context on initial eye landing sites in words. Acta Psychologica, 104(2), 191-214.

Li, X. S., Bicknell, K., Liu, P. P., Wei, W., & Rayner, K. (2014). Reading is fundamentally similar across disparate writing systems:A systematic characterization of how words and characters influence eye movements in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 143(2), 895-913.

Li, X. S., Liu, P. P., & Rayner, K. (2011). Eye movement guidance in Chinese reading:Is there a preferred viewing location? Vision Research, 51(10), 1146-1156.

Li, X. S., Liu, P. P., & Rayner, K. (2015). Saccade target selection in Chinese reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(2), 524-530.

Li, X. S., Rayner, K., & Cave, K. R. (2009). On the segmentation of Chinese words during reading. Cognitive Psychology, 58(4), 525-552.

Li, X. S., & Shen, W. (2013). Joint effect of insertion of spaces and word length in saccade target selection in Chinese reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 36, S64-S77.

Lin, N., Yu, X., Zhao, Y., & Zhang, M. (2016). Functional anatomy of recognition of Chinese multi-character words:Convergent evidence from effects of transposable nonwords, lexicality, and word frequency. PLoS One, 11(2), e0149583.

Liu, P. P., & Li, X. S. (2013). Optimal viewing position effects in the processing of isolated Chinese words. Vision Research, 81, 45-57.

Liu, P. P., & Li, X. S. (2014). Inserting spaces before and after words affects word processing differently in Chinese:Evidence from eye movements. British Journal of Psychology, 105(1), 57-68.

Liu, P. P., Li, W. J., Han, B. X., & Li, X. S. (2014). Effects of anomalous characters and small stroke omissions on eye movements during the reading of Chinese sentences. Ergonomics, 57(11), 1659-1669.

Liu, Y. P., Reichle, E. D., & Li, X. S. (2015). Parafoveal processing affects outgoing saccade length during the reading of Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(4), 1229-1236.

Liu, Y., Reichle, E. D., & Li, X. (2016). The effect of word frequency and parafoveal preview on saccade length during the reading of Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception & Performance, 42, 1008-1025.

Ma, G. J., Li, X. S., & Rayner, K. (2014). Word segmentation of overlapping ambiguous strings during Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 40(3), 1046-1059.

Ma, G. J., & Li, X. S. (2015). How character complexity modulates eye movement control in Chinese reading. Reading and Writing, 28(6), 747-761.

Ma, G. J, Li, X. S, & Rayner, K. (2015). Readers extract character frequency information from nonfixated-target word at long pretarget fixations during Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 41(5), 1409-1419.

Ma, G. J., Li, X. S., & Pollatsek, A. (2015). There is no relationship between preferred viewing location and word segmentation in Chinese reading. Visual Cognition, 23(3), 399-414.

McConkie, G. W., Kerr, P. W., Reddix, M. D., & Zola, D. (1988). Eye movement control during reading:I. The location of initial eye fixations on words. Vision Research, 28(10), 1107-1118.

Morris, R. K., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1990). Eye movement guidance in reading:The role of parafoveal letter and space information. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 16(2), 268-281.

Onnis, L., & Thiessen, E. (2013). Language experience changes subsequent learning. Cognition, 126(2), 268-284.

O'Regan, J. K., & Jacobs, A. M. (1992). Optimal viewing position effect in word recognition:A challenge to current theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 18(1), 185-197.

Pan, J. E., Yan, M., Laubrock, J., Shu, H., & Kliegl, R. (2014). Saccade-target selection of dyslexic children when reading Chinese. Vision Research, 97, 24-30.

Paterson, K. B., Almabruk, A. A. A., McGowan, V. A., White, S. J., & Jordan, T. R. (2015). Effects of word length on eye movement control:The evidence from Arabic. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(5), 1443-1450.

Paterson, K. B., McGowan, V. A., & Jordan, T. R. (2013). Aging and the control of binocular fixations during reading. Psychology and Aging, 28(3), 789-795.

Perea, M., & Acha, J. (2009). Space information is important for reading. Vision Research, 49(15), 1994-2000.

Perea, M., Panadero, V., Moret-Tatay, C., & Gómez, P. (2012). The effects of inter-letter spacing in visual-word recognition:Evidence with young normal readers and developmental dyslexics. Learning and Instruction, 22(6), 420-430.

Plummer, P., & Rayner, K. (2012). Effects of parafoveal word length and orthographic features on initial fixation landing positions in reading. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 74(5), 950-963.

Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1982). Eye movement control in reading:The role of word boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 8(6), 817-833.

Radach, R., Inhoff, A., & Heller, D. (2004). Orthographic regularity gradually modulates saccade amplitudes in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(1-2), 27-51.

Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7(1), 65-81.

Rayner, K. (1979). Eye Guidance in Reading:Fixation Locations within Words. Perception, 8(1), 21-30.

Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing:20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372-422.

Rayner, K., Ashby, J., Pollatsek, A., & Reichle, E. D. (2004). The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading:Implications for the E-Z Reader model. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 30(4), 720-732.

Rayner, K., Binder, K. S., Ashby, J., & Pollatsek, A. (2001). Eye movement control in reading:Word predictability has little influence on initial landing positions in words. Vision Research, 41(7), 943-954.

Rayner, K., Fischer, M. H., & Pollatsek, A. (1998). Unspaced text interferes with both word identification and eye movement control. Vision Research, 38(8), 1129-1144.

Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1981). Eye movement control during reading:Evidence for direct control. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A-Human Experimental Psychology, 33(4), 351-373.

Rayner, K., Sereno, S. C., & Raney, G. E. (1996). Eye movement control in reading:A comparison of two types of models. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 22(5), 1188-1200.

Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2012). Using E-Z Reader to simulate eye movements in nonreading tasks:A unified framework for understanding the eye-mind link. Psychological Review, 119(1), 155-185.

Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1999). Eye movement control in reading:Accounting for initial fixation locations and refixations within the E-Z Reader model. Vision Research, 39(26), 4403-4411.

Reingold, E. M., Reichle, E. D., Glaholt, M. G., & Sheridan, H. (2012). Direct lexical control of eye movements in reading:Evidence from a survival analysis of fixation durations. Cognitive Psychology, 65(2), 177-206.

Schad, D. J., & Engbert, R. (2012). The zoom lens of attention:Simulating shuffled versus normal text reading using the SWIFT model. Visual Cognition, 20(4-5), 391-421.

Schotter, E. R., Angele, B., & Rayner, K. (2012). Parafoveal processing in reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(1), 5-35.

Shu, H., Zhou, W., Yan, M., & Kliegl, R. (2011). Font size modulates saccade-target selection in Chinese reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(2), 482-490.

Slattery, T. J., Schotter, E. R., Berry, R. W., & Rayner, K. (2011). Parafoveal and foveal processing of abbreviations during eye fixations in reading:Making a case for case. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(4), 1022-1031.

Velan, H., Deutsch, A., & Frost, R. (2013). The flexibility of letter-position flexibility:Evidence from eye movements in reading Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 39(4), 1143-1152.

Vorstius, C., Radach, R., & Lonigan, C. J. (2014). Eye movements in developing readers:A comparison of silent and oral sentence reading. Visual Cognition, 22(3-4), 458-485.

Wei, W., Li, X. S., & Pollatsek, A. (2013). Word properties of a fixated region affect outgoing saccade length in Chinese reading. Vision Research, 80, 1-6.

White, S. J. (2008). Eye movement control during reading:Effects of word frequency and orthographic familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 34(1), 205-223.

White, S. J., & Liversedge, S. P. (2006). Foveal processing difficulty does not modulate non-foveal orthographic influences on fixation positions. Vision Research, 46(3), 426-437.

Whitford, V., O'Driscoll, G. A., Pack, C. C., Joober, R., Malla, A., & Titone, D. (2013). Reading impairments in schizophrenia relate to individual differences in phonological processing and oculomotor control:Evidence from a gaze-contingent moving window paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 142(1), 57-75.

Williams, C. C., Perea, M., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2006). Previewing the neighborhood:The role of orthographic neighbors as parafoveal previews in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 32(4), 1072-1082.

Yan, G. L., Bai, X. J., Zang, C. L., Bian, Q., Cui, L., Qi, W.,... Liversedge, S. P. (2012a). Using stroke removal to investigate Chinese character identification during reading:Evidence from eye movements. Reading and Writing, 25(5), 951-979.

Yan, M., Kliegl, R., Richter, E. M., Nuthmann, A., & Shu, H. (2010a). Flexible saccade-target selection in Chinese reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(4), 705-725.

Yan, M., Kliegl, R., Shu, H., Pan, J. E., & Zhou, X. L. (2010). Parafoveal load of word N+1 modulates preprocessing effectiveness of word N+2 in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 36(6), 1669-1676.

Yan, M., Zhou, W., Shu, H., & Kliegl, R. (2012). Lexical and sublexical semantic preview benefits in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(4), 1069-1075.

Yan, M., Zhou, W., Shu, H., Yusupu, R., Miao, D. X., Krügel, A., & Kliegl, R. (2014). Eye movements guided by morphological structure:Evidence from the Uighur language. Cognition, 132(2), 181-215.

Zang, C. L., Liang, F. F., Bai, X. J., Yan, G. L., & Liversedge, S. P. (2013). Interword spacing and landing position effects during Chinese reading in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 39(3), 720-734.