doi:

DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2017.00511

Advances in Psychological Science (心理科学进展) 2017/25:3 PP.511-522

The attitude-behavior gap of ethical consumers: From the perspective of construal level


Abstract:
Ethical consumption refers to that consumers should consider the impact of their consumption choices upon the environment, animals and society in the acquisition, use or disposal of products. Despite embracing the values of ethical consumerism, most consumers rarely support their beliefs at the check-out counter, which is considered to be the attitude-behavior gap. This study shed light on the attitude-behavior gap of ethical consumers from the perspective of construal level. From the temporal dimension, ethical consumer is in high construal level when evaluating ethical products, since he or she is far from ethical products in psychological distance, but in purchasing stage, ethical consumer is near from ethical products, so he or she is in low construal level. There are many differences in motivation and cognition under different construal levels, which lead to the attitude-behavior gap. Future research needs to focus on how to transfer this kind of support into truly positive purchasing behavior.

Key words:ethical consumption,attitude-behavior gap,construal level

ReleaseDate:2017-04-10 17:44:43



邓新明. (2014). 消费者为何喜欢"说一套, 做一套"——消费者伦理购买"意向-行为"差距的影响因素. 心理学报, 46(7), 1014-1031.

杜伟强, 曹花蕊. (2013). 基于自身短期与社会长远利益两难选择的绿色消费机制. 心理科学进展, 21(5), 775-784.

李雁晨, 周庭锐, 周琇. (2009). 解释水平理论:从时间距离到心理距离. 心理科学进展, 17(4), 667-677.

王财玉, 雷雳. (2015). 社会责任消费的结构、形成机制及企业响应. 心理科学进展, 23(7), 1245-1257.

吴波, 李东进. (2014). 伦理消费研究述评与展望. 外国经济与管理, 36(3), 20-28, 47.

严进, 楼春华. (2013). 伦理诱惑的识解水平. 心理科学进展, 21(11), 2047-2056.

Agerström, J., & Björklund, F. (2009). Moral concerns are greater for temporally distant events and are moderated by value strength. Social Cognition, 27(2), 261-282.

Akehurst, G., Afonso, C., & Gonçalves, H. M. (2012). Re-examining green purchase behaviour and the green consumer profile:New evidences. Management Decision, 50(5), 972-988.

Andorfer, V. A., & Liebe, U. (2015). Do information, price, or morals influence ethical consumption? A natural field experiment and customer survey on the purchase of Fair Trade coffee. Social Science Research, 52, 330-350.

Anderson, W. T. Jr., Henion, K. E., & Cox, E. P. (1974). Socially versus ecologically responsible consumers. American Marketing Association, Combined Conference Proceedings, 36, 304-311.

Antil, J. H. (1984). Socially responsible consumers:P rofile and implications for public policy. Journal of Macromarketing, 4(2), 18-39.

Auger, P., & Devinney, T. M. (2007). Do what consumers say matter? The misalignment of preferences with unconstrained ethical intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 76, 361-383.

Belk, R. W., Devinney, T., & Eckhardt, G. (2005). Consumer ethics across cultures. Consumption, Markets and Culture, 8(3), 275-289.

Bickart, B. A., & Ruth, J. A. (2012). Green eco-seals and advertising persuasion. Journal of Advertising, 41(4), 51-67.

Boulstridge, E., & Carrigan, M. (2000). Do consumers really care about corporate responsibility? Highlighting the attitude-behavior gap. Journal of Communication Management, 4(4), 355-368.

Bray, J., Johns, N., & Kilburn, D. (2011). An exploratory study into the factors impeding ethical consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(4), 597-608.

Carrigan, M., & Attalla, A. (2001). The myth of the ethical consumer-Do ethics matter in purchase behavior? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(7), 560-578.

Carrington, M. J., Neville, B. A., & Whitwell, G. J. (2014). Lost in translation:Exploring the ethical consumer intention-behavior gap. Journal of Business Research, 67, 2759-2767.

Carrington, M. J., Neville, B. A., & Whitwell, G. J. (2010). Why ethical consumers don't walk their talk:Towards a framework for understanding the gap between the ethical purchase intentions and actual buying behaviour of ethically minded consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 139-158.

Chen, M. F., & Tung, P. J. (2014). Developing an extended Theory of Planned Behavior model to predict consumers' intention to visit green hotels. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 36, 221-230.

Davies, I. A., Lee, Z., & Ahonkhai, I. (2012). Do consumers care about ethical-luxury? Journal of Business Ethics, 106(1), 37-51.

De Pelsmacker, P., Driesen, L., & Rayp, G. (2005). Do consumers care about ethics? Willingness to pay for fair-trade coffee. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39(2), 363-385.

Deng, X. M. (2012). Understanding consumer's responses to enterprise's ethical behaviors:An Investigation in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(2), 159-181.

Dhar, R., & Kim, E. Y. (2007). Seeing the forest or the trees:Implications of construal level theory for consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 96-100.

Ehrich, K. R., & Irwin, J. R. (2005). Willful ignorance in the request for product attribute information. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(3), 266-277.

Ellen, P. S., Webb, D. J., & Mohr, L. A. (2006). Building corporate associations:Consumer attributions for corporate socially responsible programs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 147-157.

Etim, F. (2012). Environmental philosophy for sustainable development. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 2(4), 479-487.

Eyal, T., Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Walther, E. (2004). The pros and cons of temporally near and distant action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(6), 781-795.

Fujita, K., Eyal, T., Chaiken, S., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2008). Influencing attitudes toward near and distant objects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(3), 562-572.

Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., & van den Bergh, B. (2010). Going green to be seen:Status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 392-404.

Gupta, R., & Sen, S. (2013). The effect of evolving resource synergy beliefs on the intentions-behavior discrepancy in ethical consumption. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(1), 114-121.

Han, H., Hsu, L. T., & Sheu, C. (2010). Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior to green hotel choice:Testing the effect of environmental friendly activities. Tourism Management, 31, 325-334.

Herzog, S. M., Hansen, J., & Wänke, M. (2007). Temporal distance and ease of retrieval. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(3), 483-488.

Irwin, J. R., & Baron, J. (2001). Response mode effects and moral values. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84(2), 177-197.

Jang, S. Y., Chung, J. Y., & Kim, Y. G. (2015). Effects of environmentally friendly perceptions on customers' intentions to visit environmentally friendly restaurants:An extended theory of planned behavior. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 20(6), 599-618.

Kivetz, Y., & Tyler, T. R. (2007). Tomorrow I'll be me:The effect of time perspective on the activation of idealistic versus pragmatic selves. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102(2), 193-211.

Kotler, P. (2011). Reinventing marketing to manage the environmental imperative. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 132-135.

Kronrod, A., Grinstein, A., & Wathieu, L. (2012). Go green! Should environmental messages be so assertive? Journal of Marketing, 76(1), 95-102.

Ledgerwood, A., & Callahan, S. P. (2012). The social side of abstraction:Psychological distance enhances conformity to group norms. Psychological Science, 23, 907-913.

Lee, A. Y., Keller, P. A., & Sternthal, B. (2010). Value from regulatory construal fit:The persuasive impact of fit between consumer goals and message concreteness. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 735-747.

Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions:A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 5-18.

Lin, Y. C., & Chang, C. C. A. (2012). Double standard:The role of environmental consciousness in green product usage. Journal of Marketing, 76(5), 125-134.

Luchs, M. G., Naylor, R. W., Irwin, J. R., & Raghunathan, R. (2010). The sustainability liability:Potential negative effects of ethicality on product preference. Journal of Marketing, 74(5), 18-31.

Lynch, J. G., Jr, & Zaubennan, G. (2007). Construing consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 107-112.

Milkman, K. L., Rogers, T., & Bazerman, M. H. (2010). Highbrow films gather dust:Time-inconsistent preferences and online DVD rentals. Management Science, 55(6), 1047-1059.

Newman, G. E., Gorlin, M., & Dhar, R. (2014). When going green backfires:How firm intentions shape the evaluation of socially beneficial product enhancements. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(3), 823-839.

Pyone, J. S., & Isen, A. M. (2011). Positive affect, intertemporal choice, and levels of thinking:Increasing consumers' willingness to wait. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(3), 532-543.

Rogers, T., & Bazerman, M. H. (2008). Future lock-in:Future implementation increases selection of ‘should’ choices. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 106(1), 1-20.

Roberts, J. A. (1995). Profiling levels of socially responsible consumer behavior:A cluster analytic approach and its implications for marketing. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 3(4), 97-117.

Seiders, K., Voss, G. B., Grewal, D., & Godfrey, A. L. (2005). Do satisfied customers buy more? Examining moderating influences in a retailing context. Journal of Marketing, 69(4), 26-43.

Shaw, D., Shiu, E., Hassan, L., Bekin, C., & Hogg, G. (2007). Intending to be ethical:An examination of consumer choice in sweatshop avoidance. Advances in Consumer Research, 34, 31-38.

Song, H. J., Lee, C. K., Kang, S. K., & Boo, S. J. (2012). The effect of environmentally friendly perceptions on festival visitors' decision-making process using an extended model of goal-directed behavior. Tourism Management, 33, 1417-1428.

Szmigin, I., Carrigan, M., & McEachern, M, G. (2009). The conscious consumer:Taking a flexible approach to ethical behavior. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33(2), 224-231.

Todorov, A., Goren, A., & Trope, Y. (2007). Probability as a psychological distance:Construal and preferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(3), 473-482.

Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2000). Temporal construal and time-dependent changes in preference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 876-889.

Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1989). Levels of personal agency:Individual variation in action identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4), 660-671.

van Houwelingen, G., van Dijke, M., & De Cremer, D. (2015). Getting it done and getting it right:Leader disciplinary reactions to Followers' moral transgressions are determined by construal level mindset. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(5), 878-891.

Vantomme, D., Geuens, M., De Houwer, J., & De Pelsmacker, P. (2005). Implicit attitudes toward green consumer behaviour. Psychologica Belgica, 45(4), 217-239.

Wakslak, C. J., Nussbaum, S., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2008). Representations of the self in the near and distant future. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(4), 757-773.

Webb, D. J., Mohr, L. A., & Harris, K. E. (2008). A re-examination of socially responsible consumption and its measurement. Journal of Business Research, 61(2), 91-98.

Wesley, S. C., Lee, M. Y., & Kim, E. Y. (2012). The role of perceived consumer effectiveness and motivational attitude on socially responsible purchasing behavior in South Korea. Journal of Global Marketing, 25, 29-44.

White, K., MacDonnell, R., & Dahl, D. W. (2011). It's the Mind-Set that Matters:The role of construal level and Message Framing in influencing consumer efficacy and conservation Behaviors. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(6), 472-485.