DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2017.00639

Advances in Psychological Science (心理科学进展) 2017/25:4 PP.639-651

Power cognitions in intimate relationship

Power in intimate relationship refers to the ability or capacity of one individual in an intimate relationship to change the partner's thoughts, feelings, and/or behavior so they align with one's own desired preferences, along with the ability or capacity to resist influence attempts imposed by the partner. Two of the most recent theoretical advances in this area of research are the dyadic power-social influence model and the relationship stage model of power. Researchers usually measure power in intimate relationship through self-report, observational coding or experimental manipulating. The effects of power in intimate relationship include those on thoughts, feelings, as well as prosocial, aggressive and sexual behaviors. Future research should approach power in intimate relationship from the perspective of social relations and explore a number of issues. These issues include the relation between power in intimate relationship and general power, the impact of intimacy on the effects of power in intimate relationship, as well as the impact of relationship stages on influence tactics in intimate relationships.

Key words:power,intimate relationship,dyadic power-social influence model,relationship stage model of power

ReleaseDate:2017-05-12 17:00:06

蔡頠, 吴嵩, 寇彧. (2016). 权力对亲社会行为的影响: 机制及相关因素. 心理科学进展, 26, 120-131.

段锦云, 卢志巍, 沈彦晗. (2015). 组织中的权力: 概念、理论和效应. 心理科学进展, 23, 1070-1078.

恩格斯. (1972). 家庭、私有制和国家的起源 (中共中央马克思、恩格斯、列宁、斯大林著作编译局 译). 北京: 人民出版社.

刘爱玉, 佟新. (2014). 性别观念现状及其影响因素——基于第三期全国妇女地位调查. 中国社会科学, (2), 116-129.

谭洁, 郑全全. (2010). 目标追求过程中的权力效应. 心理科学进展, 18, 1782-1788.

韦庆旺, 俞国良. (2009). 权力的社会认知研究述评. 心理科学进展, 17, 1336-1343.

魏秋江, 段锦云, 范庭卫. (2012). 权力操作范式的分析与比较. 心理科学进展, 20, 1507-1518.

Anderson, C., John, O. P., & Keltner, D. (2012). The personal sense of power. Journal of Personality, 80, 313-344.

Aron, A., Lewandowski, G. W., Jr., Mashek, D., & Aron, E. N. (2013). The self-expansion model of motivation and cognition in close relationships. In J. A. Simpson & L. Campbell (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 90-115). New York: Oxford University Press.

Bass, B. M. (1960). Leadership, psychology, and organizational behavior. Oxford: Harper.

Bentley, C. G., Galliher, R. V., & Ferguson, T. J. (2007). Associations among aspects of interpersonal power and relationship functioning in adolescent romantic couples. Sex Roles, 57, 483-495.

Blader, S. L., Shirako, A., & Chen, Y.-R. (2016). Looking out from the top: Differential effects of status and power on perspective taking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 723-737.

Blood, R. O., & Wolfe, D. M. (1960). Husbands and wives: The dynamics of married living. New York: Free Press.

Cortina, L. M., Curtin, N., & Stewart, A. J. (2012). Where is social structure in personality research? A feminist analysis of publication trends. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36, 259-273.

Côté, S., Kraus, M. W., Cheng, B. H., Oveis, C., van der Löwe, I., Lian, H., & Keltner, D. (2011). Social power facilitates the effect of prosocial orientation on empathic accuracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 217-232.

Donnelly, K., Twenge, J. M., Clark, M. A., Shaikh, S. K., Beiler-May, A., & Carter, N. T. (2016). Attitudes toward women's work and family roles in the United States, 1976-2013. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40, 41-54.

Dunbar, N. E. (2004). Theory in progress: Dyadic power theory: Constructing a communication-based theory of relational power. Journal of Family Communication, 4, 235-248.

Dunbar, N. E. (2015). A review of theoretical approaches to interpersonal power. Review of Communication, 15, 1-18.

Dunbar, N. E., & Burgoon, J. K. (2005). Perceptions of power and interactional dominance in interpersonal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 207-233.

Edwards, G. L., Barber, B. L., & Dziurawiec, S. (2014). Emotional intimacy power predicts different sexual experiences for men and women. The Journal of Sex Research, 51, 340-350.

Farrell, A. K. (2016). Behavioral, affective, cognitive, and physiological consequences of relational power during conflict (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

Farrell, A. K., Simpson, J. A., & Rothman, A. J. (2015). The relationship power inventory: Development and validation. Personal Relationships, 22, 387-413.

Fiske, S. T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48, 621-628.

Fitzsimons, G. M., Finkel, E. J., & vanDellen, M. R. (2015). Transactive goal dynamics. Psychological Review, 122, 648-673.

French, J. R. P., Jr., & Raven, B. H. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150-167). Oxford, England: University of Michigan Press.

Furman, W., & Shomaker, L. B. (2008). Patterns of interaction in adolescent romantic relationships: Distinct features and links to other close relationships. Journal of Adolescence, 31, 771-788.

Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Magee, J. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 453-466.

Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Inesi, M. E., & Gruenfeld, D. H. (2006). Power and perspectives not taken. Psychological Science, 17, 1068-1074.

Galliher, R. V., Rostosky, S. S., Welsh, D. P., & Kawaguchi, M. C. (1999). Power and psychological well-being in late adolescent romantic relationships. Sex Roles, 40, 689-710.

Gordon, A. M., & Chen, S. (2013). Does power help or hurt? The moderating role of self-other focus on power and perspective-taking in romantic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1097-1110.

Gordon, R. (2011). Leadership and power. In A. Bryman, D. Collinson, K. Grint, B. Jackson, & M. Uhl-Bien (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of leadership (pp. 195-202). Los Angeles: SAGE.

Grabe, S., Grose, R. G., & Dutt, A. (2015). Women's land ownership and relationship power: A mixed methods approach to understanding structural inequities and violence against women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39, 7-19.

Grose, R. G., & Grabe, S. (2014). The explanatory role of relationship power and control in domestic violence against women in Nicaragua: A feminist psychology analysis. Violence against Women, 20, 972-993.

Guinote, A. (2007a). Behaviour variability and the situated focus theory of power. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 256-295.

Guinote, A. (2007b). Power and goal pursuit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1076-1087.

Handwerker, W. (1998). Why violence? A test of hypotheses representing three discourses on the roots of domestic violence. Human Organization, 57, 200-208.

Inesi, M. E., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Galinsky, A. D. (2012). How power corrupts relationships: Cynical attributions for others' generous acts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 795-803.

Jewkes, R. K., Dunkle, K., Nduna, M., & Shai, N. (2010). Intimate partner violence, relationship power inequity, and incidence of HIV infection in young women in South Africa: A cohort study. The Lancet, 376, 41-48.

Karney, B. R., Hops, H., Redding, C. A., Reis, H. T., Rothman, A. J., & Simpson, J. A. (2010). A framework for incorporating dyads in models of HIV-prevention. AIDS and Behavior, 14, 189-203.

Karremans, J. C., & Smith, P. K. (2010). Having the power to forgive: When the experience of power increases interpersonal forgiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1010-1023.

Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: Wiley.

Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265-284.

Kershaw, T., Murphy, A., Divney, A., Magriples, U., Niccolai, L., & Gordon, D. (2013). What's love got to do with it: Relationship functioning and mental and physical quality of life among pregnant adolescent couples. American Journal of Community Psychology, 52, 288-301.

Kifer, Y., Heller, D., Perunovic, W. Q. E., & Galinsky, A. D. (2013). The good life of the powerful: The experience of power and authenticity enhances subjective well-being. Psychological Science, 24, 280-288.

Kuehn, M. M., Chen, S., & Gordon, A. M. (2015). Having a thicker skin: Social power buffers the negative effects of social rejection. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6, 701-709.

Lammers, J., Stoker, J. I., & Stapel, D. A. (2009). Differentiating social and personal power: Opposite effects on stereotyping, but parallel effects on behavioral approach tendencies. Psychological Science, 20, 1543-1549.

Laurin, K., Fitzsimons, G. M., Finkel, E. J., Carswell, K. L., vanDellen, M. R., Hofmann, W., ... Brown, P. C. (2016). Power and the pursuit of a partner's goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 840-868.

Lee, L. A., & Sbarra, D. A. (2013). The predictors and consequences of relationship dissolution: Breaking down silos. In C. Hazan & M. I. Campa (Eds.), Human bonding: The science of affectional ties (pp. 308-342). New York: Guilford Press.

Lemay, E. P., Jr., & Dobush, S. (2015). When do personality and emotion predict destructive behavior during relationship conflict? The role of perceived commitment asymmetry. Journal of Personality, 83, 523-534.

Lennon, C. A., Stewart, A. L., & Ledermann, T. (2013). The role of power in intimate relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 95-114.

Madsen, C. A. (2012). The impact of marital power on relational aggression (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Kansas State University, Manhattan.

Magee, J. C., & Smith, P. K. (2013). The social distance theory of power. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 158-186.

Menesini, E., Nocentini, A., Ortega-Rivera, F. J., Sanchez, V., & Ortega, R. (2011). Reciprocal involvement in adolescent dating aggression: An Italian-Spanish study. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 8, 437-451.

Oka, M., Brown, C. C., & Miller, R. B. (2016). Attachment and relational aggression: Power as a mediating variable. American Journal of Family Therapy, 44, 24-35.

Overall, N. C., Fletcher, G. J., Simpson, J. A., & Sibley, C. G. (2009). Regulating partners in intimate relationships: The costs and benefits of different communication strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 620-639.

Overall, N. C., Hammond, M. D., McNulty, J. K., & Finkel, E. J. (2016). When power shapes interpersonal behavior: Low relationship power predicts men's aggressive responses to low situational power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 195-217.

Ponzi, D., Klimczuk, A. C. E., Traficonte, D. M., & Maestripieri, D. (2015). Perceived dominance in young heterosexual couples in relation to sex, context, and frequency of arguing. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 9, 43-54.

Pratto, F., Lee, I., Tan, J. Y., & Pitpitan, E. V. (2011). Power basis theory: A psycho-ecological approach to power. In D. Dunning (Ed.), Social motivation (pp. 191-222). New York: Psychology Press.

Pulerwitz, J., Gortmaker, S. L., & DeJong, W. (2000). Measuring sexual relationship power in HIV/STD research. Sex Roles, 42, 637-660.

Righetti, F., Luchies, L. B., van Gils, S., Slotter, E. B., Witcher, B., & Kumashiro, M. (2015). The prosocial versus proself power holder: How power influences sacrifice in romantic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 779-790.

Rucker, D. D., Galinsky, A. D., & Dubois, D. (2012). Power and consumer behavior: How power shapes who and what consumers value. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22, 352-368.

Rusbult, C. E., Agnew, C., & Arriaga, X. (2012). The investment model of commitment processes. In P. A. M. van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 218-231). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.

Schmid Mast, M., Jonas, K., & Hall, J. A. (2009). Give a person power and he or she will show interpersonal sensitivity: The phenomenon and its why and when. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 835-850.

Simpson, J. A., Farrell, A. K., Oriña, M. M., & Rothman, A. J. (2015). Power and social influence in relationships. In M. Mikulincer, P. R. Shaver, J. A. Simpson, & J. F. Dovidio (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Volume 3: Interpersonal relations (pp. 393-420). Washington: American Psychological Association.

Simpson, J. A., Griskevicius, V., & Rothman, A. J. (2012). Consumer decisions in relationships. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22, 304-314.

Sprecher, S. (in press). Inequity leads to distress and a reduction in satisfaction: Evidence from a priming experiment. Journal of Family Issues.

Sprecher, S., & Felmlee, D. (1997). The balance of power in romantic heterosexual couples over time from “his” and “her” perspectives. Sex Roles, 37, 361-379.

Sprecher, S., Schmeeckle, M., & Felmlee, D. (2006). The principle of least interest: Inequality in emotional involvement in romantic relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 27, 1255-1280.

Squires, E. C. (2014). Moving beyond betrayal: How meaning-making and power promote forgiveness following infidelity (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Carleton University, Ottawa.

Sturm, R. E., & Antonakis, J. (2015). Interpersonal power: A review, critique, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 41, 136-163.

Tschann, J. M., Adler, N. E., Millstein, S. G., Gurvey, J. E., & Ellen, J. M. (2002). Relative power between sexual partners and condom use among adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 31, 17-25.

VanderDrift, L. E., Agnew, C. R., Harvey, S. M., & Warren, J. T. (2013). Whose intentions predict? Power over condom use within heterosexual dyads. Health Psychology, 32, 1038-1046.

Viejo, C., Monks, C. P., Sánchez, V., & Ortega-Ruiz, R. (2016). Physical dating violence in Spain and the United Kingdom and the importance of relationship quality. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31, 1453-1475.

Waller, W. (1938). The family: A dynamic interpretation. Oxford: Cordon. Wang, Y. N. (2015). Power, communion and satisfaction: Authenticity as a common mediator in China. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 76-82.