doi:

DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2017.01299

Advances in Psychological Science (心理科学进展) 2017/25:8 PP.1299-1309

Children's distributive justice:The role of Theory of Mind


Abstract:
Theory of Mind (ToM) plays an important role in children's development of distributive justice. The hypothesis of "multiple forces" posits that ToM can help children weigh the advantages and disadvantages of different motivations that underlie resource distribution, and find a balance between self-interest and the welfare of others. Children's ability to understand other people's desires, intentions and emotions are the three most important components of ToM that impact distributive justice in the Dictator Game, Ultimatum Game, and the Third-party Punishment Game. More empirical research is needed to support this hypothesis. Future research also should investigate whether and how different components of ToM influence different types of fair behavior. In addition, studies should explore the possible application of these research findings, such as for promoting children's distributive justice by fostering their ToM ability.

Key words:distributive justice,Theory of Mind,Dictator Game,Ultimatum Game,Third-party Punishment Game

ReleaseDate:2017-08-31 10:17:31



苏彦捷, 马天舒. (2014). 孤独症儿童的公平决策:心理理论和自我/他人情绪识别的作用. 心理科学, 37, 985-992.

王斯, 苏彦捷. (2011). 儿童面对不同对象的公平性选择:心理理论的作用. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 37(4), 26-32+233.

王斯, 苏彦捷. (2013). 从理解到使用:心理理论与儿童不同情境中的分配公平性. 心理学报, 45, 1242-1250.

于静, 朱莉琪. (2010). 儿童公平行为的发展——来自博弈实验的证据. 心理科学进展, 18, 1182-1188.

张雪, 刘文, 朱琳, 张玉. (2014). 基于贡献原则的幼儿分配公平性. 心理科学进展, 22, 1740-1746.

Almås, I., Cappelen, A. W., Sørensen, E. Ø., & Tungodden, B. (2010). Fairness and the development of inequality acceptance. Science, 328, 1176-1178.

Artinger, F., Exadaktylos, F., Koppel, H., & Sääksvuori, L. (2014). In others' shoes:Do individual differences in empathy and theory of mind shape social preferences? PLoS One, 9, e92844.

Barragan, R. C., & Dweck, C. S. (2014). Rethinking natural altruism:Simple reciprocal interactions trigger children's benevolence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 17071-17074.

Baumgartner, T., Nash, K., Hill, C., & Knoch, D. (2015). Neuroanatomy of intergroup bias:A white matter microstructure study of individual differences. NeuroImage, 122, 345-354.

Blake, P. R., & McAuliffe, K. (2011). "I had so much it didn't seem fair":Eight-year-olds reject two forms of inequity. Cognition, 120, 215-224.

Buckholtz, J. W., Asplund, C. L., Dux, P. E., Zald, D. H., Gore, J. C., Jones, O. D., & Marois, R. (2008). The neural correlates of third-party punishment. Neuron, 60, 930-940.

Castelli, I., Massaro, D., Bicchieri, C., Chavez, A., & Marchetti, A. (2014). Fairness norms and theory of mind in an ultimatum game:Judgments, offers, and decisions in school-aged children. PLoS One, 9, e105024.

Castelli, I., Massaro, D., Sanfey, A. G., & Marchetti, A. (2010). Fairness and intentionality in children's decision-making. International Review of Economics, 57, 269-288.

Cowell, J. M., Samek, A., List, J., & Decety, J. (2015). The curious relation between theory of mind and sharing in preschool age children. PLoS One, 10, e0117947.

Cushman, F., Dreber, A., Wang, Y., & Costa, J. (2009). Accidental outcomes guide punishment in a "trembling hand" game. PLoS One, 4, e6699.

Dawes, C. T., Fowler, J. H., Johnson, T., McElreath, R., & Smirnov, O. (2007). Egalitarian motives in humans. Nature, 446, 794-796.

de Quervain, D. J. F., Fischbacher, U., Treyer, V., Schellhammer, M., Schnyder, U., Buck, A., & Fehr, E. (2004). The neural basis of altruistic punishment. Science, 305, 1254-1258.

Edele, A., Dziobek, I., & Keller, M. (2013). Explaining altruistic sharing in the dictator game:The role of affective empathy, cognitive empathy, and justice sensitivity. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 96-102.

Falk, A., Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2003). On the nature of fair behavior. Economic Inquiry, 41, 20-26.

Fehr, E., Bernhard, H., & Rockenbach, B. (2008). Egalitarianism in young children. Nature, 454, 1079-1083.

Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2004). Third-party punishment and social norms. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 63-87.

Frith, C. D., & Singer, T. (2008). The role of social cognition in decision making. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B:Biological Sciences, 363, 3875-3886.

Fu, G. Y., Xiao, W. S., Killen, M., & Lee, K. (2014). Moral judgment and its relation to second-order theory of mind. Developmental Psychology, 50, 2085-2092.

Gallagher, H. L., & Frith, C. D. (2003). Functional imaging of ‘theory of mind’. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 77-83.

Glass, L., Moody, L., Grafman, J., & Krueger, F. (2016). Neural signatures of third-party punishment:Evidence from penetrating traumatic brain injury. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11, 253-262.

Grecucci, A., Giorgetta, C., Bonini, N., & Sanfey, A. G. (2012). Living emotions, avoiding emotions:Behavioral investigation of the regulation of socially driven emotions. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 616.

Grecucci, A., Giorgetta, C., van't Wout, M., Bonini, N., & Sanfey, A. G. (2013). Reappraising the ultimatum:An fMRI study of emotion regulation and decision making. Cerebral Cortex, 23, 399-410.

Gummerum, M., Hanoch, Y., & Keller, M. (2008). When child development meets economic game theory:An interdisciplinary approach to investigating social development. Human Development, 51, 235-261.

Gummerum, M., Keller, M., Takezawa, M., & Mata, J. (2008). To give or not to give:Children's and adolescents' sharing and moral negotiations in economic decision situations. Child Development, 79, 562-576.

Güroğlu, B., van den Bos, W., & Crone, E. A. (2009). Fairness considerations:Increasing understanding of intentionality during adolescence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 104, 398-409.

Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., & Smith, V. (2000). The impact of exchange context on the activation of equity in ultimatum games. Experimental Economics, 3, 5-9.

Hsu, M., Anen, C., & Quartz, S. R. (2008). The right and the good:Distributive justice and neural encoding of equity and efficiency. Science, 320, 1092-1095.

Imuta, K., Henry, J. D., Slaughter, V., Selcuk, B., & Ruffman, T. (2016). Theory of mind and prosocial behavior in childhood:A meta-analytic review. Developmental Psychology, 52, 1192-1205.

Jordan, J., McAuliffe, K., & Rand, D. (2016). The effects of endowment size and strategy method on third party punishment. Experimental Economics, 19, 741-763.

Kenward, B., & Östh, T. (2012). Enactment of third-party punishment by 4-year-olds. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 373.

Kenward, B., & Östh, T. (2015). Five-year-olds punish antisocial adults. Aggressive Behavior, 41, 413-420.

Klapwijk, E. T., Lelieveld, G. J., Aghajani, M., Boon, A. E., van der Wee, N. J. A., Popma, A., … Colins, O. F. (2016). Fairness decisions in response to emotions:A functional MRI study among criminal justice-involved boys with conduct disorder. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11, 674-682.

Kogut, T., Slovic, P., & Västfjäll, D. (2016). The effect of recipient identifiability and neediness on children's sharing behavior. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 29, 353-362.

Krasnow, M. M., Delton, A. W., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2016). Looking under the hood of third-party punishment reveals design for personal benefit. Psychological Science, 27, 405-418.

Liu, B. Y., Huang, Z. L., Xu, G. F., Jin, Y., Chen, Y. J., Li, X. H.,... Jing, J. (2016). Altruistic sharing behavior in children:Role of theory of mind and inhibitory control. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 141, 222-228.

Lu, H. J., & Chang, L. (2016). Resource allocation to kin, friends, and strangers by 3-to 6-year-old children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 150, 194-206.

McAuliffe, K., Jordan, J. J., & Warneken, F. (2015). Costly third-party punishment in young children. Cognition, 134, 1-10.

Moore, C., Barresi, J., & Thompson, C. (1998). The cognitive basis of future-oriented prosocial behavior. Social Development, 7, 198-218.

Mulvey, K. L., Buchheister, K., & McGrath, K. (2016). Evaluations of intergroup resource allocations:The role of theory of mind. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 142, 203-211.

Nelson, W. R., Jr. (2002). Equity or intention:It is the thought that counts. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 48, 423-430.

Paulus, M., & Moore, C. (2015). Preschool children's anticipation of recipients' emotions affects their resource allocation. Social Development, 24, 852-867.

Pelligra, V., Isoni, A., Fadda, R., & Doneddu, G. (2015). Theory of mind, perceived intentions and reciprocal behaviour:Evidence from individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Economic Psychology, 49, 95-107.

Radke, S., Güroğlu, B., & de Bruijn, E. R. (2012). There's something about a fair split:Intentionality moderates context-based fairness considerations in social decision-making. PLoS One, 7, e31491.

Rajhans, P., Altvater-Mackensen, N., Vaish, A., & Grossmann, T. (2016). Children's altruistic behavior in context:The role of emotional responsiveness and culture. Scientific Reports, 6, 24089.

Riedl, K., Jensen, K., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2012). No third-party punishment in chimpanzees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 14824-14829.

Rilling, J. K., Sanfey, A. G., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural correlates of theory of mind within interpersonal interactions. NeuroImage, 22, 1694-1703.

Robbins, E., & Rochat, P. (2011). Emerging signs of strong reciprocity in human ontogeny. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 353.

Rochat, P., Dias, M. D. G., Liping, G., Broesch, T., Passos-Ferreira, C., Winning, A., & Berg, B. (2009). Fairness in distributive justice by 3-and 5-year-olds across seven cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40, 416-442.

Sally, D., & Hill, E. (2006). The development of interpersonal strategy:Autism, theory-of-mind, cooperation and fairness. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27, 73-97.

Schug, J., Takagishi, H., Benech, C., & Okada, H. (2016). The development of theory of mind and positive and negative reciprocity in preschool children. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 888.

Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Suleiman, R., Aharon-Peretz, J., Gohary, R., & Hirschberger, G. (2012). Sensitivity to fairness and intentions of others in the ultimatum game in patients with ventromedial prefontal lesions. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 18, 952-961.

Sher, I., Koenig, M., & Rustichini, A. (2014). Children's strategic theory of mind. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 13307-13312.

Slaughter, V., Peterson, C. C., & Mackintosh, E. (2007). Mind what mother says:Narrative input and theory of mind in typical children and those on the autism spectrum. Child Development, 78, 839-858.

Smetana, J. G., Jambon, M., Conry-Murray, C., & Sturge-Apple, M. L. (2012). Reciprocal associations between young children's developing moral judgments and theory of mind. Developmental Psychology, 48, 1144-1155.

Takagishi, H., Kameshima, S., Schug, J., Koizumi, M., & Yamagishi, T. (2010). Theory of mind enhances preference for fairness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105, 130-137.

Takagishi, H., Koizumi, M., Fujii, T., Schug, J., Kameshima, S., & Yamagishi, T. (2014). The role of cognitive and emotional perspective taking in economic decision making in the ultimatum game. PLoS One, 9, e108462.

Weiland, S., Hewig, J., Hecht, H., Mussel, P., & Miltner, W. H. (2012). Neural correlates of fair behavior in interpersonal bargaining. Social Neuroscience, 7, 537-551.

Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001). Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development:The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72, 655-684.

Wellman, H. M., Fang, F. X., Liu, D. Q., Zhu, L. Q., & Liu, G. X. (2006). Scaling of theory-of-mind understandings in Chinese children. Psychological Science, 17, 1075-1081.

Wu, Z., & Su, Y. J. (2014). How do preschoolers' sharing behaviors relate to their theory of mind understanding? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 120, 73-86.

Xiong, M. R., Shi, J. N., Wu, Z., & Zhang, Z. (2016). Five-year-old preschoolers' sharing is influenced by anticipated reciprocation. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 460.

Yagmurlu, B. (2014). Relations among sociocognitive abilities and prosocial behavior. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 23, 591-603.

Yu, J., Zhu, L., & Leslie, A. M. (2016). Children's sharing behavior in mini-dictator games:The role of in-group favoritism and theory of mind. Child Development, 87, 1747-1757.