DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2017.01441

Advances in Psychological Science (心理科学进展) 2017/25:9 PP.1441-1455

Is altruism just other-benefiting? A dual pathway model from an evolutionary perspective

Altruism is beneficial to its recipients and the whole society. By performing altruistic behaviors, individuals altogether enhance their group function and increase the group's chance of survival in the face of crisis, which further enable the maintenance and development of the human species. However, altruistic behaviors are costly to the actors per se. It seems that altruists are often put at a disadvantage in survival and reproduction, relative to other individuals, especially to those selfish counterparts. A fundamental problem is, if altruistic behaviors inevitably reduce the fitness of altruists, how come these behaviors were spreading from generation to generation? Scholars, from a range of fields, have built intense interests in this problem, and delivered sustained efforts to solve this puzzle over a lengthy period of time. We proposed a dual pathway model based on the review of representative evolutionary explanations for altruism (i.e. multilevel selection theory and competitive altruism) and recent empirical evidence. From the internal side of an individual, altruism evokes a self-incentive process, facilitating a positive interaction between the actors' psychological reactions and physiological experiences. Such internal benefits are critical to the altruist's survival under certain circumstances. From the external side, altruism serves as a signal in interpersonal interactions, conveying information about the actors' positive quality. Altruistic individuals get an easier access to cooperation opportunities, higher status, and more mate choices in the group, and thus can be benefitted from the long term. Taken together, altruists also reap potential fitness gains from their behaviors through internal and external pathways, beyond delivering direct and tangible benefits to others. Consequently, altruism will not disappear in the process of natural selection but will prevail in human beings. Future researchers could devote themselves to examining altruistic behaviors in a broader framework of mind-body relationships. Altruistic behaviors in the public should also be encouraged in order to create a positive spiral circle of altruism on both intra-personal and interpersonal levels.

Key words:altruism,self-incentive effect,mind-body relationship,fitness

ReleaseDate:2017-10-20 02:12:48

巴斯. (2007). 进化心理学:心理的新科学(熊哲宏, 张勇, 晏倩译, 第2版). 上海:华东师范大学出版社. (原书出版于1998年)

胡天翊. (2013). 义不容辞还是情有可原:危机情境中的道德判断(博士学位论文). 北京大学.

姜丽萍, 姚岚, 王玉玲, 王一婷, 金伟琼. (2008). 桑美台风灾害对幸存者心理影响的定性研究. 中国心理卫生杂志, 22, 929-933.

李建会. (2009). 自然选择的单位:个体、群体还是基因. 科学文化评论, 6(6), 19-29.

李靖宇. (2014). 低自我控制状态增加危机情景中的利他行为(硕士学位论文). 北京大学.

李可丰. (2014). 为什么受伤的总是你? 疼痛敏感性与不公平感的关系探究(硕士学位论文). 北京大学.

林靖. (2013). 利他缓解疼痛(硕士学位论文). 北京大学.

柳春香, 黄希庭. (2008). 特质焦虑大学生注意偏向的实验研究. 心理科学, 31, 1304-1307, 1300.

秦敏辉, 周卓钊, 钟毅平. (2015). 网络表情图片阈下情绪启动对认知偏向的影响. 心理研究, 8(3), 46-50.

申秀丽. (2014). 让我们眼中的他人更美好——危机情境中利他对于表情感知的影响(硕士学位论文). 北京大学.

孙晶尧. (2013). 不公平感影响疼痛知觉(学士学位论文). 北京大学.

王学义, 金圭星, 王青翠, 刘小玉, 李少成, 何林. (2003). SARS流行期不同人群心理状况调查分析. 健康心理学杂志, 11, 441-442.

徐超. (2014). 利他缓解疼痛及fMRI研究(硕士学位论文). 北京大学.

中国新闻网. (2013). 聚焦浙江救灾:政府挑起大梁灾民自救互助. 2013-10-12取自

莊雅婷. (2017). 人际公民行为与身心感受的关系:双螺旋模型 (博士学位论文). 北京大学.

Ackerman, J. M., Nocera, C. C., & Bargh, J. A. (2010). Incidental haptic sensations influence social judgments and decisions. Science, 328, 1712-1715.

Alvarez, K., & van Leeuwen, E. (2015). Paying it forward:How helping others can reduce the psychological threat of receiving help. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45, 1-9.

Barclay, P. (2010). Altruism as a courtship display:Some effects of third-party generosity on audience perceptions. British Journal of Psychology, 101, 123-135.

Bateson, M., Nettle, D., & Roberts, G. (2006). Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting. Biology Letters, 2, 412-414.

Bereczkei, T., Birkas, B., & Kerekes, Z. (2010). Altruism towards strangers in need:Costly signaling in an industrial society. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 95-103.

Boehm, C. (1997). Impact of the human egalitarian syndrome on Darwinian selection mechanics. The American Naturalist, 150(Suppl. 1), S100-S121.

Cai, F. Y., Yang, Z. Y., Wyer, R. S., Jr., & Xu, A. J. (2017). The interactive effects of bitter flavor and mood on the decision to spend or save money. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 48-58.

Cameron, C. D., & Payne, B. K. (2011). Escaping affect:How motivated emotion regulation creates insensitivity to mass suffering. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 1-15.

Clavien, C., & Chapuisat, M. (2016). The evolution of utility functions and psychological altruism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C:Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 56, 24-31.

Crocker, J., Canevello, A., & Brown, A. A. (2017). Social motivation:Costs and benefits of selfishness and otherishness. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 299-325.

Darwin, C. R. (1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London:John Murray.

Dawkins, R. (2006). The selfish gene (30th ed.). New York:Oxford University Press.

Eldakar, O. T., & Wilson, D. S. (2011). Eight criticisms not to make about group selection. Evolution, 65, 1523-1526.

Farrelly, D., Clemson, P., & Guthrie, M. (2016). Are women's mate preferences for altruism also influenced by physical attractiveness? Evolutionary Psychology, 14, doi:10.1177/1474704915623698.

Fehrler, S., & Przepiorka, W. (2013). Charitable giving as a signal of trustworthiness:Disentangling the signaling benefits of altruistic acts. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34, 139-145.

Frey, B. S., Savage, D. A., & Torgler, B. (2010). Interaction of natural survival instincts and internalized social norms exploring the Titanic and Lusitania disasters. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 4862-4865.

Haley, K. J., & Fessler, D. M. T. (2005). Nobody's watching?:Subtle cues affect generosity in an anonymous economic game. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 245-256.

Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1-16.

Harbaugh, W. T., Mayr, U., & Burghart, D. R. (2007). Neural responses to taxation and voluntary giving reveal motives for charitable donations. Science, 316, 1622-1625.

Hardy, C. L., & van Vugt, M. (2006). Nice guys finish first:The competitive altruism hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1402-1413.

Harel, I., & Kogut, T. (2015). Visceral needs and donation decisions:Do people identify with suffering or with relief? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 56, 24-29.

Harlow, H. F. (1958). The nature of love. American Psychologist, 13, 673-685.

Hauser, D. J., Preston, S. D., & Stansfield, R. B. (2014). Altruism in the wild:When affiliative motives to help positive people overtake empathic motives to help the distressed. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 143, 1295-1305.

Hirschberger, G., Ein-Dor, T., & Almakias, S. (2008). The self-protective altruist:Terror management and the ambivalent nature of prosocial behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 666-678.

Hu, T. Y., Li, J. Y., Jia, H. Y., & Xie, X. F. (2016). Helping others, warming yourself:Altruistic behaviors increase warmth feelings of the ambient environment. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1349.

Huneke, M., & Pinel, E. C. (2016). Fostering selflessness through I-sharing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 63, 10-18.

Ijzerman, H., Coan, J. A., Wagemans, F. M. A., Missler, M. A., van Beest, I., Lindenberg, S., & Tops, M. (2015). A theory of social thermoregulation in human primates. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 464.

Jordan, J. J., Hoffman, M., Nowak, M. A., & Rand, D. G. (2016). Uncalculating cooperation is used to signal trustworthiness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, 8658-8663.

Kogut, T., & Ritov, I. (2007). "One of us":Outstanding willingness to help save a single identified compatriot. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 104, 150-157.

Kurzban, R., Burton-Chellew, M. N., & West, S. A. (2015). The evolution of altruism in humans. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 575-599.

Lacetera, N., & Macis, M. (2010). Social image concerns and prosocial behavior:Field evidence from a nonlinear incentive scheme. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 76, 225-237.

Li, X. L., & Xie, X. F. (2017). The helping behavior helps lighten physical burden. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, doi:10.1080/01973533.2017.1320762.

Li, Y. Y., Li, H., Decety, J., & Lee, K. (2013). Experiencing a natural disaster alters children's altruistic giving. Psychological Science, 24, 1686-1695.

Lin-Healy, F., & Small, D. A. (2013). Nice guys finish last and guys in last are nice:The clash between doing well and doing good. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 692-698.

Liu, W., & Aaker, J. (2008). The happiness of giving:The time-ask effect. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 543-557.

Madan, C. R., Spetch, M. L., & Ludvig, E. A. (2015). Rapid makes risky:Time pressure increases risk seeking in decisions from experience. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27, 921-928.

Mogilner, C., Chance, Z., & Norton, M. I. (2012). Giving time gives you time. Psychological Science, 23, 1233-1238.

Moore, D., Wigby, S., English, S., Wong, S., Székely, T., & Harrison, F. (2013). Selflessness is sexy:Reported helping behaviour increases desirability of men and women as long-term sexual partners. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 13, 182.

Nowak, M. A., & Sigmund, K. (1998). Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring. Nature, 393, 573-577.

Nowak, M. A., & Sigmund, K. (2005). Evolution of indirect reciprocity. Nature, 437, 1291-1298.

Proffitt, D. R. (2006). Embodied perception and the economy of action. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 110-122.

Reed, A., Aquino, K., & Levy, E. (2007). Moral identity and judgments of charitable behaviors. Journal of Marketing, 71, 178-193.

Roberts, G. (1998). Competitive altruism:From reciprocity to the handicap principle. Proceedings of the Royal Society B:Biological Sciences, 265, 427-431.

Roberts, G. (2015). Human cooperation:The race to give. Current Biology, 25, R425-R427.

Saqib, N. U., & Chan, E. Y. (2015). Time pressure reverses risk preferences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 130, 58-68.

Schnall, S., Roper, J., & Fessler, D. M. T. (2010). Elevation leads to altruistic behavior. Psychological Science, 21, 315-320.

Smith, J. M. (1982). Evolution and the theory of games. New York:Cambridge University Press.

Sober, E., & Wilson, D. S. (1998). Unto others:The evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior. Cambridge, Mass:Harvard University Press.

Sober, E., & Wilson, D. S. (2002). Perspectives and parameterizations commentary on Benjamin Kerr and peter Godfrey-Smith's "individualist and multi-level perspectives on selection in structured populations". Biology and Philosophy, 17, 529-537.

Sylwester, K., & Roberts, G. (2010). Cooperators benefit through reputation-based partner choice in economic games. Biology Letters, 6, 659-662.

Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 35-57.

Turvey, M. T., Shockley, K., & Carello, C. (1999). Affordance, proper function, and the physical basis of perceived heaviness. Cognition, 73, B17-B26.

van Doesum, N. J., Tybur, J. M., & van Lange, P. A. (2017). Class impressions:Higher social class elicits lower prosociality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 68, 11-20.

van Lange, P. A. M., Joireman, J., Parks, C. D., & van Dijk, E. (2013). The psychology of social dilemmas:A review. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120, 125-141.

van Vugt, M., Roberts, G., & Hardy, C. (2007). Competitive altruism:Development of reputation-based cooperation in groups. In R. Dunbar & L. Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 531-540). Oxford:Oxford University Press.

Wang, H. X., Li, K. F., & Xie, X. F. (2017). Individual differences in pain sensitivity predict the experience of unfairness. Journal of Health Psychology, doi:10.1177/1359105316685902.

West, S. A., & Gardner, A. (2013). Adaptation and inclusive fitness. Current Biology, 23, R577-R584.

Williams, G. C. (1966). Adaptation and natural selection:A critique of some current evolutionary thought. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.

Williams, L. E., & Bargh, J. A. (2008). Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth. Science, 322, 606-607.

Wilson, D. S. (1975). A theory of group selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 72, 143-146.

Wilson, D. S. (1997). Altruism and organism:Disentangling the themes of multilevel selection theory. The American Naturalist, 150(Suppl. 1), S122-S134.

Wilson, D. S. (2009). Truth and reconciliation for group selection XIX:Happily ever after. Retrieved November 17, 2009, from

Wilson, D. S. (2010). Truth and reconciliation for group selection. Retrieved November 19, 2010, from

Wilson, D. S., & Wilson, E. O. (2007). Rethinking the theoretical foundation of sociobiology. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 82, 327-348.

Wilson, E. O. (1978). On human nature. Cambridge:Harvard University Press.

Yang, A. X., Hsee, C. K., & Urminsky, O. (2014). Eager to help yet reluctant to give:How pro-social effort and pro-social choices diverge. Online working paper.

Yoeli, E., Hoffman, M., Rand, D. G., & Nowak, M. A. (2013). Powering up with indirect reciprocity in a large-scale field experiment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(Suppl. 2), 10424-10429.

Zahavi, A. (1975). Mate selection-a selection for a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 53, 205-214.

Zahavi, A., & Zahavi, A. (1997). The handicap principle:A missing piece of Darwin's puzzle. New York:Oxford University Press.

Zhong, C. B., Bohns, V. K., & Gino, F. (2010). Good lamps are the best police:Darkness increases dishonesty and self-interested behavior. Psychological Science, 21, 311-314.