doi:

DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2017.01512

Advances in Psychological Science (心理科学进展) 2017/25:9 PP.1512-1520

The mechanism of the retrieval practice effect:From encoding, retrieval to integration of both


Abstract:
Retrieval Practice Effect (RPE) means that compared with restudy in the same amount of time, retrieval practice (even without feedback) can effectively help people achieve a better performance in the final memory test. In the early researches, RPE was explained from either encoding or retrieval, and basically those explanations focused on describing RPE in different experimental designs. Recently, researchers integrated encoding and retrieval, the full memory process, to investigate the mechanism of the RPE, and has been supported by more and more research evidences. The article discussed current hypotheses of the RPE, then specifically differentiated the elaborative retrieval hypothesis and the episodic context account, and pointed out the advantage of the latter. Further work could use cognitive neuroscience technique to provide more direct proof for episodic context account. The controversy about the promoting effect of retrieval practice in the short-term and long-term memory remains to be further explained. Meanwhile, the way to put it into use effectively remains to be discovered in practice.

Key words:retrieval practice effect,mechanism,encoding,retrieval

ReleaseDate:2017-10-20 02:12:50



周爱保, 马小凤, 李晶, 崔丹. (2013). 提取练习在记忆保持与迁移中的优势效应:基于认知负荷理论的解释. 心理学报, 45, 849-859.

Bai, C. H., Bridger, E. K., Zimmer, H. D., & Mecklinger, A. (2015). The beneficial effect of testing:An event-related potential study. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, 248.

Barbey, A. K., Koenigs, M., & Grafman, J. (2013). Dorsolateral prefrontal contributions to human working memory. Cortex, 49, 1195-1205.

Benjamin, A. S., & Tullis, J. (2010). What makes distributed practice effective? Cognitive Psychology, 61, 228-247.

Bjork, R. A. (1975). Retrieval as a memory modifier:An interpretation of negative recency and related phenomena. In R. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition:The Loyola symposium (pp. 123-144). Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.

Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1992). A new theory of disuse and an old theory of stimulus fluctuation. In A. Healy, S. Kosslyn, & R. Shiffrin (Eds.), From learning processes to cognitive processes:Essays in honor of William K. Estes (Vol. 2, pp. 35-67). Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.

Blunt, J. R., & Karpicke, J. D. (2014). Learning with retrieval-based concept mapping. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 849-858.

Borst, J. P., & Anderson, J. R. (2013). Using model-based functional MRI to locate working memory updates and declarative memory retrievals in the fronto-parietal network. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110, 1628-1633.

Butler, A. C. (2010). Repeated testing produces superior transfer of learning relative to repeated studying. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1118-1133.

Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L. Ⅲ. (2007). Testing improves long-term retention in a simulated classroom setting. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 514-527.

Cabeza, R., Ciaramelli, E., Olson, I. R., & Moscovitch, M. (2008). The parietal cortex and episodic memory:An attentional account. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9, 613-625.

Carpenter, S. K. (2009). Cue strength as a moderator of the testing effect:The benefits of elaborative retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1563-1569.

Carpenter, S. K. (2011). Semantic information activated during retrieval contributes to later retention:Support for the mediator effectiveness hypothesis of the testing effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1547-1552.

Carpenter, S. K., & DeLosh, E. L. (2005). Application of the testing and spacing effects to name learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 619-636.

Carpenter, S. K., & DeLosh, E. L. (2006). Impoverished cue support enhances subsequent retention:Support for the elaborative retrieval explanation of the testing effect. Memory & Cognition, 34(2), 268-276.

Carpenter, S. K., & Kelly, J. W. (2012). Tests enhance retention and transfer of spatial learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 443-448.

Chan, J. C. K., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L. Ⅲ. (2006). Retrieval-induced facilitation:Initially nontested material can benefit from prior testing of related material. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 135, 553-571.

Coppens, L. C., Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L., & Rikers, R. M. J. P. (2011). Learning adinkra symbols:The effect of testing. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23, 351-357.

Dudukovic, N. M., DuBrow, S., & Wagner, A. D. (2009). Attention during memory retrieval enhances future remembering. Memory & Cognition, 37, 953-961.

Gaspelin, N., Ruthruff, E., & Pashler, H. (2013). Divided attention:An undesirable difficulty in memory retention. Memory & Cognition, 41, 978-988.

Glover, J. A. (1989). The "testing" phenomenon:Not gone but nearly forgotten. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 392-399.

Halamish, V., & Bjork, R. A. (2011). When does testing enhance retention? A distribution-based interpretation of retrieval as a memory modifier. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 801-812.

Hogan, R. M., & Kintsch, W. (1971). Differential effects of study and test trials on long-term recognition and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 562-567.

Howard, M. W., & Kahana, M. J. (2002). A distributed representation of temporal context. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 46, 269-299.

Kang, S. H. K. (2010). Enhancing visuospatial learning:The benefit of retrieval practice. Memory & Cognition, 38, 1009-1017.

Karpicke, J. D. (2009). Metacognitive control and strategy selection:Deciding to practice retrieval during learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 138, 469-486.

Karpicke, J. D., & Bauernschmidt, A. (2011). Spaced retrieval:Absolute spacing enhances learning regardless of relative spacing. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1250-1257.

Karpicke, J. D., & Blunt, J. R. (2011). Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. Science, 331, 772-775.

Karpicke, J. D., & Grimaldi, P. J. (2012). Retrieval-based learning:A perspective for enhancing meaningful learning. Educational Psychology Review, 24, 401-418.

Karpicke, J. D., Lehman, M., & Aue, W. R. (2014). Retrieval-based learning:An episodic context account. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (vol. 61, pp. 237-284). San Diego, CA:Elsevier Academic Press.

Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L. Ⅲ. (2008). The critical importance of retrieval for learning. Science, 319, 966-968.

Karpicke, J. D., & Smith, M. A. (2012). Separate mnemonic effects of retrieval practice and elaborative encoding. Journal of Memory and Language, 67, 17-29.

Karpicke, J. D., & Zaromb, F. M. (2010). Retrieval mode distinguishes the testing effect from the generation effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 227-239.

Kornell, N. (2015). If it is stored in my memory I will surely retrieve it:Anatomy of a metacognitive belief. Metacognition and Learning, 10, 279-292.

Kornell, N., Bjork, R. A., & Garcia, M. A. (2011). Why tests appear to prevent forgetting:A distribution-based bifurcation model. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 85-97.

Kornell, N., & Finn, B. (2016). Self-regulated learning:An overview of theory and data. In J. Dunlosky & S. K. Tauber (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of metamemory. Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.

Kornell, N., & Vaughn, K. E. (2016). How retrieval attempts affect learning:A review and synthesis. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 65, 183-215.

Landauer, T. K., & Bjork, R. A. (1978). Optimum rehearsal patterns and name learning. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory (pp. 625-632). London, UK:Academic Press.

Lehman, M., & Karpicke, J. D. (2016). Elaborative retrieval:Do semantic mediators improve memory? Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42, 1573-1591.

Lehman, M., & Malmberg, K. J. (2013). A buffer model of memory encoding and temporal correlations in retrieval. Psychological Review, 120, 155-189.

Lehman, M., Smith, M. A., & Karpicke, J. D. (2014). Toward an episodic context account of retrieval-based learning:Dissociating retrieval practice and elaboration. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 1787-1794.

Martin, E. (1968). Stimulus meaningfulness and paired-associate transfer:An encoding variability hypothesis. Psychological Review, 75, 421-441.

McDaniel, M. A., & Masson, M. E. J. (1985). Altering memory representations through retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 371-385.

Melton, A. W. (1970). The situation with respect to the spacing of repetitions and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 596-606.

Pashler, H., Zarow, G., & Triplett, B. (2003). Is temporal spacing of tests helpful even when it inflates error rates? Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 1051-1057.

Pyc, M. A., & Rawson, K. A. (2010). Why testing improves memory:Mediator effectiveness hypothesis. Science, 330, 335.

Raaijmakers, J. G. W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1981). Search of associative memory. Psychological Review, 88, 93-134.

Rawson, K. A., Vaughn, K. E., & Carpenter, S. K. (2015). Does the benefit of testing depend on lag, and if so, why? Evaluating the elaborative retrieval hypothesis. Memory & Cognition, 43, 619-633.

Roediger, H. L. Ⅲ., & Butler, A. C. (2011). The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 20-27.

Roediger, H. L. Ⅲ., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). The power of testing memory basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 181-210.

Rosburg, T., Johansson, M., Weigl, M., & Mecklinger, A. (2015). How does testing affect retrieval-related processes? An event-related potential (ERP) study on the short-term effects of repeated retrieval. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 15, 195-210.

Slamecka, N. J., & Katsaiti, L. T. (1988). Normal forgetting of verbal lists as a function of prior testing. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 716-727.

Smith, M. A., Roediger, H. L. Ⅲ., & Karpicke, J. D. (2013). Covert retrieval practice benefits retention as much as overt retrieval practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 1712-1725.

Surprenant, A. M., & Neath, I. (2009). Principles of memory. New York, NY:Psychology Press.

Thompson, C. P., Wenger, S. K., & Bartling, C. A. (1978). How recall facilitates subsequent recall:A reappraisal. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Learning and Memory, 4, 210-221.

Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Schmidt, H. G. (2004). Detrimental influence of contextual change on spacing effects in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 796-800.

Wagner, A. D., Shannon, B. J., Kahn, I., & Buckner, R. L. (2005). Parietal lobe contributions to episodic memory retrieval. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 445-453.

Whiffen, J. W., & Karpicke, J. D. (2017). The role of episodic context in retrieval practice effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, doi:10.1037/xlm0000379. (in Press)