doi:

DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.00400

Advances in Psychological Science (心理科学进展) 2018/26:3 PP.400-410

The differentiation of employee followership from the perspective of regulatory focus:Influence mechanism of causes and effects


Abstract:
Followership refers to a polymorphic behavior orientated from the organizational aims of the followers who actively interact with leadership and organizational context. Studies of followership are still scarce in the academic community both at home and abroad. The aim of this study lies at inquiring the influence mechanism of causal analysis for the differentiation of employee followership from the perspective of regulatory focus theory in three parts. Firstly, the internal structure and measurement of employee followership are cleared and defined in view of two different regulatory focuses. Secondly, the antecedents and their influential mechanisms on the differentiation of employee followership are under review from three aspects including the characteristic's influence of leadership with its moderate effects of LMX, the organizational context's influence with its moderate effects of employees' perceived organizational justice, and the individual characteristic's influence with its moderate effects of leadership feedback based upon trait activation theory. Lastly, the way is explored as to how the differentiation of employee followership exerts influence on job performance. On account of these schemes established, the adaptation of the followership theory to the practice of organizational followership can be achieved.

Key words:regulatory focus theory,promotion followership,prevention followership,influence mechanism

ReleaseDate:2018-03-29 16:57:01



曹元坤, 黄晓波, 谭娟. (2008). 值得关注的管理学前沿:追随问题研究. 当代财经, (7), 118-123.

曹元坤, 许晟. (2013). 部属追随力:概念界定与量表开发. 当代财经, (3), 82-89.

程敏. (2015). 家长式领导对员工追随和绩效的影响:人际公平的调节作用(硕士学位论文). 浙江大学, 杭州.

丁桂凤, 张澎涛. (2013). 领导不当督导与追随者规范承诺:追随力的中介作用. 心理与行为研究, 11(6), 796-800.

段锦云. (2011). 中国背景下建言行为研究:结构、形成机制及影响. 心理科学进展, 19(2), 185-192.

樊景立, 郑伯埙. (2000). 华人组织的家长式领导:一项文化观点的分析. 本土心理学研究, (13), 127-180.

韩树杰. (2015). 追随力:一个值得深入研究的新领域. 中国人力资源开发, (15), 3.

姜定宇, 郑伯埙. (2003). 组织忠诚、组织承诺、及组织公民行为研究之回顾与前瞻. 应用心理研究, (19), 175-209.

李圭泉, 席酉民, 尚玉钒, 李磊. (2014). 领导反馈与知识共享:工作调节焦点的中介作用. 科技进步与对策, (4), 120-125.

李浩澜, 宋继文, 周文杰. (2015). 中国文化背景下变革型领导风格对员工追随力的作用机制. 中国人力资源开发, (15), 47-55.

李磊, 尚玉钒, 席酉民. (2010). 基于调节焦点理论的领导对下属影响机制研究. 外国经济与管理, 32(7), 49-56.

李磊, 尚玉钒, 席酉民. (2012). 基于调节焦点理论的领导语言框架对下属创造力的影响研究. 科研管理, 33(1), 127-137.

李燕萍, 涂乙冬. (2011). 与领导关系好就能获得职业成功吗? 一项调节的中介效应研究. 心理学报, 43(8), 941-952.

刘新民, 秦静, 黄腾. (2013). 内隐领导认知差异、领导效能与员工追随力关系——基于资源型企业的实证研究. 煤炭经济研究, 33(9), 43-48.

罗文豪. (2015). 追随研究的历史溯源、现实驱力与未来展望. 中国人力资源开发, (15), 6-15.

陶厚永, 李薇, 陈建安, 李玲. (2014). 领导-追随行为互动研究:对偶心理定位的视角. 中国工业经济, (12), 104-117.

王顼. (2011). 追随的内容结构及与绩效的关系研究(硕士学位论文). 浙江大学, 杭州.

吴敏, 黄旭, 徐玖平, 阎洪, 时勘. (2007). 交易型领导、变革型领导与家长式领导行为的比较研究. 科研管理, 28(3), 168-176.

徐行言. (2005). 中西文化比较. 北京:北京大学出版社.

许晟. (2014). 追随力对领导效能的作用机理研究. 北京:经济管理出版社.

杨国枢. (1991). 华人心理的本土化研究. 台北:台北桂冠图书公司.

姚艳虹, 韩树强. (2013). 组织公平与人格特质对员工创新行为的交互影响研究. 管理学报, 10(5), 700-707.

原涛, 凌文辁. (2010). 追随力研究述评与展望. 心理科学进展, 18(5), 769-780.

战伟萍. (2009). 芭芭拉.凯勒曼:《追随力:追随者们如何创造变革并改变领导者》. 公共管理评论, 8, 186-191.

张厚粲, 杨玉芳, 孙健敏. (2015). 人力资源管理. 北京:中国人民大学出版社.

赵慧军. (2013). 追随行为的探索性研究. 经济与管理研究, (4), 106-110.

郑伯埙. (1999). 企业组织中上下属的信任关系. 社会学研究, (2), 69-78.

郑伯埙, 黄美萍, 周丽芳. (2002). 家长式领导及其效能:华人企业团队的证据. 香港华人心理学报, 3(1), 85-112.

周浩, 龙立荣. (2005). 恩威并施, 以德服人——家长式领导研究述评. 心理科学进展, 13(2), 227-238.

周文杰, 宋继文, 李浩澜. (2015). 中国情境下追随力的内涵、结构与测量. 管理学报, 12(3), 355-363.

朱立言, 雷强. (2000). 论领导者与追随者. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版), (4), 1-6, 18.

Amabile, T. M., & Conti, R. (1999). Changes in the work environment for creativity during downsizing. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 630-640.

Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior:A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 103-118.

Bennis, W. (2010). Art of followership. Leadership Excellence Essentials, 27, 3-4.

Carsten, M. K., Uhl-Bien, M., West, B. J., Patera, J. L., & McGregor, R. (2010). Exploring social constructions of followership:A qualitative study. The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 543-562.

Carsten. M. K., & Uhl-Bien, M. (2013). Ethical followership:An examination of followership beliefs and crimes of obedience. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 20, 49-61.

Chaleff, I. (2008). Creating new ways of following. In R. Riggio, I. Chaleff, & J. Lipman-Blumen (Eds.), The art of followership:How great followers create great leaders and organizations (pp. 67-87). San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.

Costa, P. T., & McCrae. R. R. (1989). The NEO-PI/NEO-FFI manual supplement. Odessa:Psychological Assessment Resources.

Dixon, G., & Westbrook, J. (2003). Followers revealed. Engineering Management Journal, 15, 19-26.

Farh, J. L., Zhong, C. B., & Organ, D. W. (2004). Organizational citizenship behavior in the People's Republic of China. Organization Science, 15, 241-253.

Foti, R., Hansbrough, T. K., Epitropaki, O., & Coyle, P. (2014). Special issue:Dynamic viewpoints on implicit leadership and followership theories. The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 411-412.

Gardner, W. L., Avolio, B. J., Luthans, F., May, D. R., & Walumbwa, F. (2005). "Can you see the real me?" A self-based model of authentic leader and follower development. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 343-372.

Gilbert, G. R., & Hyde, A. C. (1988). Followership and the federal worker. Pubic Administration Review, 48, 962-968.

Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280-1300.

Higgins. E. T. (2000). Making a good decision:value form fit. American Psychologist, 55, 1217-1230.

Hunt, J. G. (1999). Transformational/charismatic leadership's tranformation of the field:An historical essay. The Leadership Quarterly, 10, 129-144.

Jehn, K. A., & Bezrukova, K. (2004). A field study of group diversity, workgroup context, and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 703-729.

Kellerman, B. (2008). Followership:How followers are creating change and changing leaders. Boston:Harvard Business Press.

Kelley, R. E. (1988). In praise of followers. Harvard Business Review, 66, 142-148.

Kelley, R. E. (2008). Rethinking followership. In R. Riggio, I. Chaleff, & J. Lipman-Blumen (Eds.), The art of followership:How great followers create great leaders and organizations (pp. 5-15). San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.

Latour, S. M., & Rast, V. J. (2004). Dynamic followership:The prerequisite for effective leadership. Air & Space Power Journal, 18, 102-110.

Liang, J., Farh, C. I. C. & Farh, J. L. (2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice:A two-wave examination. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 71-92.

Scandura, T. A. (1999). Rethinking leader-member exchange:An organizational justice perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 10, 25-40.

Seibert. S. E., Crant. J. M., & Kraimer, M. L. (1999). Proactive personality and career success. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 416-427.

Strauss, A. (2002). Basics of qualitative research:Grounded theory Procedures and techniques. Newburry Park:Stage.

Tett, R. P., & Burnett, D. D. (2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 500-517.

Uhl-Bien, M., Riggio, R.. E., Lowe, K. B., & Carsten, M. K. (2014). Followership theory:A review and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 83-104.

Wee, E. X. M., Liao, H., Liu, D., & Liu, J. (2017). Moving from abuse to reconciliation:A power-dependency perspective on when and how a follower can break the spiral of abuse. Academy of Management Journal, doi:10.5465/amj.2015.0866.

Zaleznik, A. (1977). Managers and leaders:Are they different?. Harvard Business Review, 55, 67-78.

Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity:Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 682-696.