doi:

DOI:

Advances in Psychological Science (心理科学进展) 2018/26:5 PP.789-795

Text-belief consistent effect and the way of avoidance


Abstract:
Prior beliefs that people already have would lead to a biased process of new information.The text-belief consistent effect demonstrates that the process of text which is inconsistent with prior beliefs is better than the process of text which is consistent in text base;in situation model,however,the process of the text which is consistent is better than the process of text which is not.The text-belief consist effect can partly be explained by the combination of the plausibility evaluation theory and the dual processing models of cognition.The way to eliminate the negative impact of the text-belief consistent effect,such as manipulate the presentation of text,is also discussed and prospected in this paper.

Key words:prior beliefs,text-belief consistent effect,plausibility evaluation theory,dual processing models of cognition

ReleaseDate:2018-07-02 16:10:47



Andiliou, A., Ramsay, C. M., Murphy, P. K., & Fast, J. (2012). Weighing opposing positions:Examining the effects of intratextual persuasive messages on students' knowledge and beliefs. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37(2), 113-127.

Beker, K., Jolles, D., Lorch, R. F., Jr., & van den Broek, P. (2016). Learning from texts:Activation of information from previous texts during reading. Reading and Writing, 29(6), 1161-1178.

Bohn-Gettler, C. M., & McCrudden, M. T. (2017). Effects of task relevance instructions and topic beliefs on reading processes and memory. Discourse Processes, doi:10.1080/0163853X.2017.1292824.

Bråten, I., Salmerón, L., & Strømsø, H. I. (2016). Who said that? Investigating the plausibility-induced source focusing assumption with Norwegian undergraduate readers. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 46, 253-262.

Britt, M. A., & Rouet, J. F. (2012). Learning with multiple documents:Component skills and their acquisition. In Enhancing the quality of learning:Dispositions, instruction, and learning processes (pp. 276-314). Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

de Pereyra, G., Britt, M. A., Braasch, J. L. G., & Rouet, J. F. (2014). Reader's memory for information sources in simple news stories:Effects of text and task features. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26(2), 187-204.

Gawronski, B., & Strack, F. (2012). Cognitive consistency as a basic principle of social information processing. In Cognitive consistency:A fundamental principle in social cognition (pp. 1-18). New York:Guilford Press.

Kaakinen, J. K., & Hyönä, J. (2005). Perspective effects on expository text comprehension:Evidence from think-aloud protocols, eyetracking, and recall. Discourse Processes, 40(3), 239-257.

Kaakinen, J. K., Hyönä, J., & Keenan, J. M. (2002). Perspective effects on online text processing. Discourse Processes, 33(2), 159-173.

Kadash, C. M., & Howell, K. L. (2000). Effects of epistemological beliefs and topic-specific beliefs on undergraduates' cognitive and strategic processing of dual-positional text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 524-535.

Kahan, D. M., Peters, E., Wittlin, M., Slovic, P., Ouellette, L. L., Braman, D., & Mandel, G. (2012). The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nature Climate Change, 2(10), 732-735.

Kendeou, P., Walsh, E. K., Smith, E. R., & O'Brien, E. J. (2014). Knowledge revision processes in refutation texts. Discourse Processes, 51(5-6), 374-397.

Lombardi, D., Nussbaum, E. M., & Sinatra, G. M. (2016). Plausibility judgments in conceptual change and epistemic cognition. Educational Psychologist, 51(1), 35-56.

Maier, J., & Richter, T. (2013). Text belief consistency effects in the comprehension of multiple texts with conflicting information. Cognition and Instruction, 31(2), 151-175.

Maier, J., & Richter, T. (2014). Fostering multiple text comprehension:How metacognitive strategies and motivation moderate the text-belief consistency effect. Metacognition and Learning, 9(1), 51-74.

Maier, J., & Richter, T. (2016). Effects of text-belief consistency and reading task on the strategic validation of multiple texts. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 31(4), 479-497.

Murphy, P. K., & Mason, L. (2006). Changing knowledge and beliefs. In Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 305-324). Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias:A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2, 175-220.

Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Toplak, M. E. (2013). Myside bias, rational thinking, and intelligence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(4), 259-264.

Strømsø, H. I., Bråten, I., & Stenseth, T. (2017). The role of students' prior topic beliefs in recall and evaluation of information from texts on socio-scientific issues. Nordic Psychology, 69(3), 127-142.

van Strien, J. L. H., Brand-Gruwel, S., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2014). Dealing with conflicting information from multiple nonlinear texts:Effects of prior attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 101-111.

van Strien, J. L. H., Kammerer, Y., Brand-Gruwel, S., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2016). How attitude strength biases information processing and evaluation on the web. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 245-252.

Wiley, J. (2005). A fair and balanced look at the news:What affects memory for controversial arguments? Journal of Memory and Language, 53(1), 95-109.

Wolfe, M. B., & Kurby, C. A. (2017). Belief in the claim of an argument increases perceived argument soundness. Discourse Processes, 54(8), 599-617.

Wolfe, M. B., Tanner, S. M., & Taylor, A. R. (2013). Processing and representation of arguments in one-sided texts about disputed topics. Discourse Processes, 50(7), 457-497.