doi:

DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2010.100

Biodiversity Science (生物多样性) 2010/18:1 PP.100-107

A comparison of FAO and CITES aquatic species management regimes


Abstract:
The Food and Agriculture Organization(FAO) and the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora(CITES) are both involved in the protection of biodiversity.CITES is a mechanism which limits international trade in wildlife,while the FAO is more concerned with scientific management of the agricultural and fishery industries in order to promote their sustainable development.Consequently,these two organizations employ different goals and methodologies in their management of aquatic species,and their work is complementary.Over the past few years,the FAO has begun to cooperate with CITES on issues of aquatic species management.However,to date the organizations have not precisely defined their respective responsibilities,their technological standards are not coordinated,and the FAO has not assented to certain provisions in CITES on species management.This article compares FAO and CITES management of several important aquatic species,and offers several recommendations directed at improving Chinese conservation management of aquatic species and conformance to respective FAO and CITES management regimes,while preserving Chinese legal rights and interests.

Key words:convention,fishery,aquatic species,conservation,management

ReleaseDate:2015-03-11 14:47:19



Butterworth DS (2000) Possible interpretation problems for the current CITES listing criteria in the context of marine fish species under commercial harvest. Population Ecology, 42, 29-35.

CITES (1994) Conf. 9.24 (Rev. CoP13):Criteria for amendment of Appendices I and II adopted at the ninth meeting of the Conference of the Parties. Fort Lauderdale, United States of America, 7-18 November 1994. http://www.cites.org/eng/res/all/09/E09-24R13.pdf [accessed 2010-1-29].

CITES (2007a) CoP14 Doc. 62 annex1 adopted at the fourteenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties. The Hague, Netherlands, 3-15 June 2007. http://www.cites.org/eng/cop/14/doc/E14-62.pdf [accessed 2010-1-29].

CITES (2007b) Conf.14.2:CITES strategic vision:2008-2013 adopted at the fourteenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties. The Hague, Netherlands, 3-15 June 2007. http://www.cites.org/eng/res/all/14/E14-02.pdf [accessed 2010-1- 29].

Fan XG (樊祥国), Zhou YJ (周宇晶), Liu BX (刘宝祥), Feng GF (冯庚菲), Fan EY (樊恩源) (2008) Analysis and countermeasure on proposals for aquatic species in CITES. Biodiversity Science (生物多样性), 16, 516-524. (in Chinese with English abstract)

FAO (2001) COFI/2001/6:Review of the CITES listing criteria for species exploited by fisheries in marine and large freshwater bodies adopted at Twenty-forth Session of the Committee on Fisheries. Rome, Italy, 26 February-2 March 2001. http://www.fao.org/docrep/MEETING/003/X8772E.HTM [accessed 2010-1-29].

FAO (2003) Terms of reference for ad hoc expert advisory panel for assessment of proposals to CITES adopted at the twenty-fifth session of the Committee on Fisheries. Rome, Italy, 24-28 February. ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/010/a1143e/a1143e.pdf [accessed 2010-1-29].

FAO (2004a) Report of the Expert Consultation on Legal Issues Related to CITES and Commercially-Exploited Aquatic Species. Rome, Italy, 22-25 June 2004. http://www.fao.org/docrep/007/y5807e/y5807-e00.HTM [accessed 2010-1- 29].

FAO (2004b) Report of the Expert Consultation on Implementation Issues Associated with Listing CommerciallyExploited Aquatic Species on CITES Appendices. Rome, Italy 25-28 May 2004. http://www.fao.org/docrep/007/y5751e/y5751e00.HTM [accessed 2010-1-29]. FAO (2005) Report of the Expert Consultation on the Implementation of the FAO International Plan of Action for the Conservation and Management of Sharks. Rome, Italy, 6-8 December 2005. ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/009/a0523e/a0523e00.pdf. [accessed 2010-1-29].

Wang S (汪松), Xie Y (解焱) (2004) China Species Red List (中国物种红色名录). Higher Education Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)