DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1219.2013.00742
Information and Control (信息与控制) 2013/42:6 PP.742-749
Abstract：
The robust model prediction algorithm based on linear matrix inequality breaks into two parts- online and offline. In order to improve the response speed and control accuracy of system, the upper bound of objective function obtained by offline algorithm is set as a known parameter and reoptimization is carried out to get a sequence of asymptotically stable invariant ellipsoid sets. The state variables can be determined-lying between two ellipsoid sets within the ellipsoid set sequence, on the basis of online measured state variables. The state variables can be accurately located and the system control variable can be obtained by adding an adjacent small elliptical set and optimizing with three ellipsoid sets. The online optimization is theoretically proved. Simulation results indicate that the control effect of the proposed algorithm is better than conventional algorithms. Taking fan control system in variable air volume (VAV) air-conditioning system as an example, the results verify the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm.
ReleaseDate：2015-04-15 18:52:44
[1] Kothare M, Balakrishnan V, Morari M. Robust constrained model predictive control using linear matrix inequalities[J]. Automatica, 1996, 32(10): 1361-1379.
[2] Cuzzola F A, Geromel J C. An improved approach for constrained robust model predictive control[J] . Automatica, 2002, 14(8): 1183-1189.
[3] Zheng A. Reducing on-line computational demands in model predictive control by approximating QP constraints[J]. Journal of Process Control, 1999, 9(4): 279-290.
[4] Van Antwerp J G, Braatz R D. Fast model predictive control of sheet and film processes[J]. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2000, 8(3): 408-417.
[5] Wan Z Y, Kothare M V. An efficient off-line formulation of robust model predictive control using linear matrix inequalities [J]. Automatica, 2003, 39(5): 837-846.
[6] Ding B C, Xi Y G, Cychowskic M T, et al. A synthesis approach for output feedback robust constrained model predictive control[J]. Automatica, 2008, 44(1): 258-264.
[7] Huang G S. Model predictive control of VAV zone thermal systems concerning bi-linearity and gain nonlinearity[J]. Control Engineering Practice, 2011, 19(7): 700-710.
[8] Wan Z Y, Kothare M V. Robust output feedback model predictive control using off-line linear matrix inequalities[J]. Journal of Process Control, 2002, 12(5): 763-774.
[9] Ding B C, Xi Y G, Cychowskic M T, et al. Improving off-line approach to robust MPC based-on nominal performance cost[J]. Automatica, 2007, 43(1): 158-163.
[10] Wan Z Y, Kothare M V. Efficient robust constrained model predictive control with a time varying terminal constraint set[J]. Systems & Control Letters, 2003, 48(5): 375-383.
[11] Ding B C, Xi Y G, Li S Y. A synthesis approach of online constrained robust model predictive control[J]. Automatica, 2004, 40(1): 163-167.
[12] Lee Y I, Kouvaritakis B. Constrained robust model predictive control based on periodic invariance[J]. Automatica, 2006, 42(12): 2175-2181.
[13] Li D W, Xi Y G. Design of robust model predictive control based on multi-step control set[J]. Automatica, 2009, 35(4): 433-437.
[14] Huang G S, Wang S W. Use of uncertainty polytope to describe constraint processes with uncertain time-delay for robust model predictive control applications[J]. ISA Transactions, 2009, 48(1): 503-511.
[15] Huang G S, Wang S W. Two-loop robust MPC for the temperature control of air-handling units[J]. HVAC&R Research, 2008, 14(4): 565-580.
[16] Huang G S, Wang S W, Xu X H. Robust model predictive control of VAV air-handling units concerning uncertainties and constraints[J]. HVAC&R Research, 2010, 16(1): 15-33.