DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1263.2011.00114

Journal of Geriatric Cardiology 2011/8:2 PP.114-120

Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in hospitalized elderly patients: Time to consider a MUST strategy

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the commonest cause of preventable death in hospitalized patients. Elderly patients have higher risk of VTE because of the high prevalence of predisposing comorbidities and acute illnesses. Clinical diagnosis of VTE in the elderly patient is particularly difficult and, as such, adequate VTE prophylaxis is of pivotal importance in reducing the mortality and morbidities of VTE. Omission of VTE prophylaxis is, however, very common despite continuous education. A simple way to overcome this problem is to implement universal VTE prophylaxis for all hospitalized elderly patients instead of selective prophylaxis for some patients only according to individual’s risk of VTE. Although pharmacological VTE prophylaxis is effective for most patients, a high prevalence of renal impairment and drug interactions in the hospitalized elderly patients suggests that a multimodality approach may be more appropriate. Mechanical VTE prophylaxis, including calf and thigh compression devices and/or an inferior vena cava filter, are often underutilized in hospitalized elderly patients who are at high-risk of bleeding and VTE. Because pneumatic compression devices and thigh length stockings are virtually risk free, mechanical VTE prophylaxis may allow early or immediate implementation of VTE prophylaxis for all hospitalized elderly patients, regardless of their bleeding and VTE risk. Although the cost-effectiveness of this Multimodality Universal STat (MUST) VTE prophylaxis approach for hospitalized elderly patients remains uncertain, this strategy appears to offer some advantages over the traditional selective and single-modal VTE prophylaxis approach, which often becomes hit or miss or not implemented promptly in many hospitalized elderly patients. A large clustered randomized controlled trial is, however, needed to assess whether early, multimodality, universal VTE prophylaxis can improve important clinical outcomes of hospitalized elderly patients.

Key words:age,bundle of care,deep vein thrombosis,prevention,pulmonary embolism

ReleaseDate:2014-07-21 15:50:40

1 Galson SK. The Surgeon General’s Call to Action to Prevent Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism. http://www. (accessed on 18 February, 2011).

2 National Quality Forum. National Voluntary Consensus Standards for Prevention and Care of Venous Thromboembolism: additional performance measures. Executive summary 2008. (accessed on 18 February, 2011).

3 Beckman MG, Hooper WC, Critchley SE, et al. Venous thromboembolism: a public health concern. Am J Prev Med 2010; 38: S495-501.

4 Cohen AT, Agnelli G, Anderson FA, et al. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in Europe. The number of VTE events and associated morbidity and mortality. Thromb Haemost 2007; 98: 756-764.

5 The burden of venous thromboembolism in Australia. Report by Access Economics Pty Limited for the Australian and New Zealand Working Party on the management and prevention of venous thromboembolism in Australia. 2008 May.

6 Engbers MJ, van Hylckama Vlieg A, Rosendaal FR. Venous thrombosis in the elderly: incidence, risk factors and risk groups. J Thromb Haemost 2010; 8: 2105-2112.

7 Lindblad B, Sternby NH, Bergqvist D. Incidence of venous thromboembolism verified by necropsy over 30 years. BMJ 1991; 302: 709-711.

8 Piazza G, Seddighzadeh A, Goldhaber SZ. Deep-vein thrombosis in the elderly. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2008; 14: 393-398.

9 Ho KM, Burrell M, Rao S, et al. Incidence and risk factors for fatal pulmonary embolism after major trauma: a nested cohort study. Br J Anaesth. 2010; 105: 596-602.

10 Pineda LA, Hathwar VS, Grant BJ. Clinical suspicion of fatal pulmonary embolism. Chest 2001; 120: 791-795.

11 Le Gal G, Righini M, Roy PM, et al. Differential value of risk factors and clinical signs for diagnosing pulmonary embolism according to age. J Thromb Haemost 2005; 3: 2457-2464.

12 Lippi G, Cervellin G, Franchini M, et al. Biochemical markers for the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism: the past, present and future. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2010; 30: 459-471.

13 Douma RA, le Gal G, Söhne M, et al. Potential of an age adjusted D-dimer cut-off value to improve the exclusion of pulmonary embolism in older patients: a retrospective analysis of three large cohorts. BMJ 2010; 340: c1475.

14 Cohen AT, Tapson VF, Bergmann JF, et al. Venous thromboembolism risk and prophylaxis in the acute hospital care setting (ENDORSE study): a multinational cross-sectional study. Lancet 2008; 371: 387-394.

15 Cohen AT. Prevention of postoperative venous thromboembolism. BMJ 2009; 339: b4477.

16 Barbar S, Noventa F, Rossetto V, et al. A risk assessment model for the identification of hospitalized medical patients at risk for venous thromboembolism: the Padua Prediction Score. J Thromb Haemost 2010; 8: 2450-2457.

17 Lassen MR, Borris LC, Backs S, et al. Clinical limitations of risk assessment models. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 1999; 10 Suppl 2: S45-51.

18 Joint Commission International. Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) measures. http://www.jointcommissioninternational. org/common/PDFs/JCI%20Standards/International_Library_of_Measures/VTE_Measures_and_Details_090810.pdf (accessed on 18 February, 2011).

19 Steele N, Dodenhoff RM, Ward AJ, et al. Thromboprophylaxis in pelvic and acetabular trauma surgery. The role of early treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87: 209-212.

20 Nathens AB, McMurray MK, Cuschieri J, et al. The practice of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in the major trauma patient. J Trauma 2007; 62: 557-562.

21 Nendaz MR, Chopard P, Lovis C, et al. Adequacy of venous thromboprophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients (IMPART): multisite comparison of different clinical decision support systems. J Thromb Haemost 2010; 8: 1230-1234.

22 Goldhaber SZ. Eradication of hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism. Thromb Haemost 2010; 104: 1089-1092.

23 Kucher N, Koo S, Quiroz R, et al. Electronic alerts to prevent venous thromboembolism among hospitalized patients. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 969-977.

24 Kakkar AK, Davidson BL, Haas SK et al. Compliance with recommended prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism: improving the use and rate of uptake of clinical practice guidelines. J Thromb Haemost 2004; 2: 221-227.

25 Ginzburg E, Dujardin F. Physicians' perceptions of the definition of major bleeding in major orthopedic surgery: results of an international survey. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2011; 31: 188-195.

26 Tapson VF, Decousus H, Pini M, et al; IMPROVE Investigators. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in acutely ill hospitalized medical patients: findings from the International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism. Chest 2007; 132: 936-945.

27 Vasco B, Villalba JC, Lopez-Jimenez L, et al. Venous thromboembolism in nonagenarians. Findings from the RIETE Registry. Thromb Haemost 2009; 101: 1112-1118.

28 López-Jiménez L, Montero M, González-Fajardo JA, et al.Venous thromboembolism in very elderly patients: findings from a prospective registry (RIETE). Haematologica 2006; 91: 1046-1051.

29 Decousus H, Tapson VF, Bergmann JF, et al. Factors at admission associated with bleeding risk in medical patients: findings from the IMPROVE investigators. Chest 2011; 139: 69-79.

30 Nieto JA, Bruscas MJ, Ruiz-Ribo D, et al. Acute venous thromboembolism in patients with recent major bleeding. The influence of the site of bleeding and the time elapsed on outcome. J Thromb Haemost 2006; 4: 2367-2372.

31 Hamilton MG, Yee WH, Hull RD, et al. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients undergoing cranial neurosurgery: A Systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurgery 2011; 68: 571-581.

32 Geerts WH, Bergqvist D, Pineo GF, et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 2008; 133: 381S-453S.

33 Tincani E, Crowther MA, Turrini F, et al. Prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism in the elderly patient. Clin Interv Aging 2007; 2: 237-246.

34 Eikelboom JW, Quinlan DJ, O'Donnell M. Major bleeding, mortality, and efficacy of fondaparinux in venous thromboembolism prevention trials. Circulation 2009; 120: 2006-2011.

35 Selby R, Geerts W. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: consensus, controversies, and challenges. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2009: 286-292.

36 Cohen AT, Davidson BL, Gallus AS, et al. Efficacy and safety of fondaparinux for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in older acute medical patients: randomised placebo controlled trial. BMJ 2006; 332: 325-329.

37 Samama MM, Cohen AT, Darmon JY, et al. A comparison of enoxaparin with placebo for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients. Prophylaxis in Medical Patients with Enoxaparin Study Group. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 793-800.

38 Samama MM, Kleber FX. An update on prevention of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized acutely ill medical patients. Thromb J 2006; 4: 8.

39 Sherman DG, Albers GW, Bladin C, et al. The efficacy and safety of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after acute ischaemic stroke (PREVAIL Study): an open-label randomised comparison. Lancet 2007; 369: 1347-1355.

40 Wein L, Wein S, Haas SJ, et al. Pharmacological venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in hospitalized medical patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med 2007; 167: 1476-1486.

41 Limpus A, Chaboyer W, McDonald E, et al. Mechanical thromboprophylaxis in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Crit Care 2006; 15: 402-410.

42 Chiasson TC, Manns BJ, Stelfox HT. An economic evaluation of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis strategies in critically ill trauma patients at risk of bleeding. PLoS Med 2009; 6: e1000098.

43 CLOTS (Clots in Legs Or sTockings after Stroke) Trial Collaboration. Thigh-length versus below-knee stockings for deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis after stroke: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2010; 153: 553-562.

44 Serin K, Yanar H, Ozdenkaya Y, et al. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis methods in trauma and emergency surgery intensive care unit patients: low molecular weight heparin versus elastic stockings + intermittent pneumatic compression. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2010; 16: 130-134.

45 Orken DN, Kenangil G, Ozkurt H, et al. Prevention of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurologist 2009; 15: 329-331.

46 Colwell CW Jr, Froimson MI, Mont MA, et al. Thrombosis prevention after total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized trial comparing a mobile compression device with low-molecular-weight heparin. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92: 527-535.

47 Wille-Jørgensen P, Rasmussen MS, Andersen BR, et al. Heparins and mechanical methods for thromboprophylaxis in colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; (4): CD001217.

48 Romera-Villegas A, Cairols-Castellote MA, Vila-Coll R, et al. Early mobilisation in patients with acute deep vein thrombosis does not increase the risk of a symptomatic pulmonary embolism. Int Angiol 2008; 27: 494-499.

49 Partsch H, Kaulich M, Mayer W. Immediate mobilisation in acute vein thrombosis reduces post-thrombotic syndrome. Int Angiol 2004; 23: 206-212.

50 Trujillo-Santos AJ, Martos-Pérez F, Perea-Milla E. Bed rest or early mobilization as treatment of deep vein thrombosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Clin (Barc) 2004; 122: 641-647.

51 Fanikos J, Piazza G, Zayaruzny M, et al. Long-term complications of medical patients with hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism. Thromb Haemost 2009; 102: 688-693.