DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1263.2012.01312

Journal of Geriatric Cardiology 2012/9:2 PP.192-196

Acute coronary syndromes: an old age problem

The increasing population in older age will lead to greater numbers of them presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). This has implications on global healthcare resources and necessitates better management and selection for evidenced-based therapies. The elderly are a high risk group with more significant treatment benefits than younger ACS. Nevertheless, age related inequalities in ACS care are recognised and persist. This discrepancy in care, to some extent, is explained by the higher frequency of atypical and delayed presentations in the elderly, and less diagnostic electrocardiograms at presentation, potentiating a delay in ACS diagnosis. Under estimation of mortality risk in the elderly due to limited consideration for physiological frailty, co-morbidity, cognitive/psychological impairment and physical disability, less input by cardiology specialists and lack of randomised, controlled trials data to guide management in the elderly may further confound the inequality of care. While these inequalities exist, there remains a substantial opportunity to improve age related ACS outcomes. The selection of elderly patients for specific therapies and medication regimens are unanswered. There is a growing need for randomised, controlled trial data to be more representative of the population and enroll those of advanced age with co-morbidity. A lack of reporting of adverse events, such as renal impairment post coronary angiography, in the elderly further limit risk benefit decisions. Substantial improvements in care of elderly ACS patients are required and should be advocated. Ultimately, these improvements are likely to lead to better outcomes post ACS. However, the improvement in outcome is not infinite and will be limited by non-modifiable factors of age-related risk.

Key words:Acute coronary syndromes,Elderly patients,Inequalities of care,Evidenced-based treatments

ReleaseDate:2014-07-21 16:18:40

1 Van de Werf F, Bax J, Betriu A, et al. ESC guidelines on management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation. Rev Esp Cardiol 2009; 62: 293, E1-E47.

2 Hamm CW, Bassand JP, Agewall S, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2011; 32: 2999-3054.

3 Wright RS, Anderson JL, Adams CD, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Unstable Angina/Non-ST- Elevation Myocardial Infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines developed in collaboration with the American Academy of Family Physicians, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 57: E215-E367.

4 Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction-executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1999 guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44: 671-719.

5 The World Health Organisation. The Global Health Observatory, 2011. (Accessed in December, 2011).

6 Fox KA, Goodman SG, Klein W, et al. Management of acute coronary syndromes. Variations in practice and outcome; findings from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE). Eur Heart J 2002; 23: 1177-1189.

7 Mandelzweig L, Battler A, Boyko V, et al. The second Euro Heart Survey on acute coronary syndromes: Characteristics, treatment, and outcome of patients with ACS in Europe and the Mediterranean Basin in 2004. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 2285-2293.

8 Jha AK, Li Z, Orav EJ, et al. Care in U.S. Hospitals--the Hospital Quality Alliance program. N Engl J Med 2005; 353: 265-274.

9 Birkhead JS, Weston C, Lowe D. Impact of specialty of admitting physician and type of hospital on care and outcome for myocardial infarction in England and Wales during 2004-5: observational study. BMJ 2006; 332: 1306-1311.

10 Gale CP, Cattle BA, Woolston A, et al. Resolving inequalities in care? Reduced mortality in the elderly after acute coronary syndromes. The Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project 2003-2010. Eur Heart J 2012; 33: 630-639.

11 Avezum A, Makdisse M, Spencer F, et al. Impact of age on management and outcome of acute coronary syndrome: Observations from the global registry of acute coronary events (GRACE). Am Heart J 2005; 149: 67-73.

12 Collinson J, Bakhai A, Flather MD, et al. The management and investigation of elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST elevation: an evidence-based approach? Results of the Prospective Registry of Acute Ischaemic Syndromes in the United Kingdom (PRAIS-UK). Age and Ageing 2005; 34: 61-66.

13 Fox KAA, Anderson FA, Dabbous OH, et al. Intervention in acute coronary syndromes: do patients undergo intervention on the basis of their risk characteristics? The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE). Heart 2007; 93: 177-182.

14 Gabriel Steg P, Iung B, Feldman LJ, et al. Determinants of use and outcomes of invasive coronary procedures in acute coronary syndromes: results from ENACT. Eur Heart J 2003; 24: 613-622.

15 Hasdai D, Holmes J, Criger DA, et al. Age and outcome after acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST-segment elevation. Am Heart J 2000; 139: 858-866.

16 Rosengren A, Wallentin L, Simoons M, et al. Age, clinical presentation, and outcome of acute coronary syndromes in the Euroheart acute coronary syndrome survey. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 789-795.

17 Tran CTT, Laupacis A, Mamdani MM, et al. Effect of age on the use of evidence-based therapies for acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 2004; 48: 834-841.

18 Eagle KA, Lim MJ, Dabbous OH, et al. A validated prediction model for all forms of acute coronary syndrome. JAMA 2004; 291: 2727-2733.

19 Elbarouni B, Goodman SG, Yan RT, et al. Validation of the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Event (GRACE) risk score for in-hospital mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome in Canada. Am Heart J 2009; 158: 392-399.

20 Gale CP, Manda SO, Weston CF, et al. Evaluation of risk scores for risk stratification of acute coronary syndromes in the Myocardial Infarction National Audit Project (MINAP) Database. Heart 2009; 95: 221-227.

21 Kozieradzka A, Kaminski KA, Maciorkowska D, et al. GRACE, TIMI, Zwolle and CADILLAC risk scores-Do they predict 5-year outcomes after ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated invasively? Int J Cardiol 2011; 148: 70-75.

22 Life Expectancies; UK National Statistics 2011. http://www. (accessed in December, 2011)

23 Alexander KP, Newby LK, Cannon CP, et al. Acute Coronary Care in the Elderly, Part I. Circulation 2007; 115: 2549-2569.

24 Alexander KP, Newby LK, Armstrong PW, et al. Acute Coronary Care in the Elderly, Part II. Circulation 2007; 115: 2570-2589.

25 Alter DA, Manuel DG, Gunraj N, et al. Age, risk-benefit trade-offs, and the projected effects of evidence-based therapies. Am J Med 2004; 116: 540-545.

26 Fox KAA, Steg PG, Eagle KA, et al. Decline in Rates of Death and Heart Failure in Acute Coronary Syndromes, 1999- 2006. JAMA 2007; 297: 1892-1900.

27 Yan AT, Yan RT, Tan M, et al. Optimal medical therapy at discharge in patients with acute coronary syndromes: temporal changes, characteristics, and 1-year outcome. Am Heart J 2007; 154: 1108-1115.

28 Peterson ED, Shah BR, Parsons L, et al. Trends in quality of care for patients with acute myocardial infarction in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction from 1990 to 2006. Am Heart J 2008; 56: 1045-1055.

29 Brieger D, Eagle KA, Goodman SG, et al. Acute coronary syndromes without chest pain, an underdiagnosed and undertreated high-risk group: insights from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events. Chest 2004; 126: 461-469.

30 Gale CP, Metcalfe E, West RM, et al. An assessment of the concentration-related prognostic value of cardiac troponin I following acute coronary syndrome. Am J Cardiol 2011; 108: 1259-1265.

31 Cusack BJ. Pharmacokinetics in older persons. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother 2004; 2: 274-302.

32 Alexander KP, Chen AY, Roe MT, et al. Excess dosing of antiplatelet and antithrombin agents in the treatment of non- ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. JAMA 2005; 294: 3108-3116.

33 Yang X, Alexander KP, Chen AY, et al. The implications of blood transfusions for patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: results from the CRUSADE National Quality Improvement Initiative. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 1490-1495.

34 Halon DA, Adawi S, Dobrecky-Mery I, et al. Importance of increasing age on the presentation and outcome of acute coronary syndromes in elderly patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43: 346-352.

35 Devlin G, Gore JM, Elliott J, et al. Management and 6-month outcomes in elderly and very elderly patients with high-risk non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events. Eur Heart J 2008; 29: 1275-1282.

36 Yan RT, Yan AT, Tan M, et al. Age-related differences in the management and outcome of patients with acute coronary syndromes. Am Heart J 2006; 151: 352-359.

37 Department of Health. The National Service Framework for coronary heart disease: modern standards and service models, 2000. chdexecsum. pdf (Accessed on November 1, 2011).