DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1263.2012.05021

Journal of Geriatric Cardiology 2012/9:4 PP.336-343

Incomplete revascularization in the drug eluting stent era permits meaningful long-term (12-78 months) outcomes in patients ≥ 75 years with acute coronary syndrome

Objective To compare long-term prognosis between complete revascularization (CR) and incomplete revascularization (IR) in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods We prospectively enrolled patients ≥ 75 years with ACS and multi-lesion disease between January 2005 and December 2010 at our center (Institute of Geriatric Cardiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital). Baseline clinical characteristics, PCI parameters and long-term (12 to 78 months) outcomes including main adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE) were compared between CR and IR groups. We used the Kaplan-Meier curve to describe the survival rates, and variables reported to be associated with prognosis were included in Cox regression. Results Of the 502 patients, 230 patients obtained CR, and the other 272 patients underwent IR. Higher SYNTAX score was an independent predictor of IR [Odds ratio (OR): 1.141, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.066–1.221, P = 0.000]. A total of 429 patients (85.5%) were followed with a duration ranging from 12 months to 78 months. There were no significant differences in cumulative survival rates and event free survival rates between the two groups, even for patients with multi-vessel disease. Older age (OR: 1.079, 95% CI: 1.007–1.157, P = 0.032), prior myocardial infarction (OR: 1.440, 95% CI: 1.268–2.723, P = 0.001) and hypertension (OR: 1. 653, 95% CI: 1.010–2.734, P = 0.050) were significant independent predictors of long-term MACCE. Conclusions Given that both clinical and coronary lesion characteristics are much more complex in patients ≥75 years with ACS and multi-lesion disease, IR may be an option allowing low risk hospital results and meaningful long-term (12 to 78 months) outcomes.

Key words:Elderly patients,Percutaneous Coronary Intervention,Incomplete Revascularization,Long-term Prognosis

ReleaseDate:2014-07-21 16:32:08

1 Zimarino M, Calafiore AM, De Caterina R. Complete myocardial revascularization: between myth and reality. Eur Heart J 2005; 26: 1824-1830.

2 Hannan EL, Wu C, Walford G, et al. Incomplete revascularization in the era of drug-eluting stents: impact on adverse outcomes. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2009; 2: 17-25.

3 Williams B, Menon M, Satran D, et al. Patients with coronary artery disease not amenable to traditional revascularization: prevalence and 3-year mortality. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 75: 886-891.

4 Synnergren MJ, Ekroth R, Oden A, et al. Incomplete revascularization reduces survival benefit of coronary artery bypass grafting: role of off-pump surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008; 136: 29-36.

5 Guerra M, Mota JC. Impact of incomplete surgical revascularization on survival. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2012; 14: 176-182

6 Mohr FW, Rastan AJ, Serruys PW, et al. Complex coronary anatomy in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: impact of complex coronary anatomy in modern bypass surgery? Lessons learned from the SYNTAX trial after two years. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011; 141: 130-140.

7 Wu C, Dyer AM, King SB, et al. Impact of incomplete revascularization on long-term mortality after coronary stenting. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2011; 4: 413-421.

8 Kim YH, Park DW, Lee JY, et al. Impact of angiographic complete revascularization after drug-eluting stent implantation or coronary artery bypass graft surgery for multivessel coronary artery disease. Circulation 2011; 123: 2373-2381.

9 Yang HH, Chen Y, Gao CY. The influence of complete coronary revascularization on long-term outcomes in patients with multivessel coronary heart disease undergoing successful percutaneous coronary intervention. J Int Med Res 2010; 38: 1106-1112.

10 He J, Gu DF, Wu XG, et al. Major causes of death among men and women in China. N Engl J Med 2005; 353: 1124- 1134.

11 Yusuf S, Reddy S, Ounpuu S, et al. Global burden of cardiovascular diseases: part I: general considerations, the epidemiologic transition, risk factors, and impact of urbanization. Circulation 2001; 104: 2746-2753.

12 Yach D, Hawkes C, Gould CL, et al. The global burden of chronic diseases: overcoming impediments to prevention and control. JAMA 2004; 291: 2616-2622.

13 Ezzati M, Lopez AD, Rodgers A, et al. Selected major risk factors and global and regional burden of disease. Lancet 2002; 360: 1347-1360.

14 Chen Q, Yang Y, Liu Y, et al. Safety and effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in elderly patients. a 5-year consecutive study of 201 cases with PCI. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2010; 51: 312-316.

15 Wang TY, Gutierrez A, Peterson ED. Percutaneous coronary intervention in the elderly. Nat Rev Cardiol 2010; 8: 79-90.

16 Wiemer M, Langer C, Kottmann T, et al. Outcome in the elderly undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with sirolimus-eluting stents: results from the prospective multicenter German Cypher Stent Registry. Am Heart J 2007; 154: 682–687.

17 Varani E, Aquilina M, Balducelli M, et al. Percutaneous coronary interventions in octogenarians: Acute and 12 month results in a large single-centre experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2009; 73: 449-454.

18 Gerardo OZ, Leandro IL, Fernando K, et al. Culprit-Only or multivessel percutaneous coronary stenting in patients with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: One- Year Follow-Up. J Interv Cardiol 2009; 22: 329-335.

19 Harold LD. Reasonable Incomplete Revascularization. Circulation 2011; 123: 2337-2340.

20 Philippe G, Tullio P, Adriano C, et al. Quantification and impact of untreated coronary artery disease after percutaneous coronary intervention (The Residual SYNTAX (Synergy Between PCI With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) Score). JACC. 2012; 59: 1-10.

21 Dacey LJ, Likosky DS, Ryan TJ, et al. Long-term survival after surgery versus percutaneous intervention in octogenarians with multivessel coronary disease. Ann Thorac Surg 2007; 84: 1904-1911.

22 Anstrom KJ, Kong DF, Shaw LK, et al. Long-term clinical outcomes following coronary stenting. Arch Intern Med 2008; 168: 1647-1655.

23 Serruys PW, Unger F, Sousa JE, et al. Comparison of coronary-artery bypass surgery and stenting for the treatment of multivessel disease. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 1117–1124.

24 Priebe HJ. The aged cardiovascular risk patient. Br J Anaesth 2000; 85: 763-778.

25 Alexander KP, Newby LK, Cannon CP, et al. Acute coronary care in the elderly, part I: Non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology: in collaboration with the Society of Geriatric Cardiology. Circulation 2007; 115: 2549–2569.

26 Alexander KP, Newby LK, Armstrong PW, et al. Acute coronary care in the elderly, part II: ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology: in collaboration with the Society of Geriatric Cardiology. Circulation 2007; 115: 2570-2589.

27 Douglas PS, Brennan JM, Anstrom KJ, et al. Clinical effecttiveness of coronary stents in elderly persons: results from 262,700 Medicare patients in the American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53: 1629-1641.

28 Daniel EF, David AC, Stephen GE, et al. Long-term paclitaxel-eluting stent outcomes in elderly patients. Circulation: Cardiovasc interv 2009; 2: 178-187.

29 Glaser R, Selzer F, Faxon DP, et al. Clinical progression of incidental, asymptomatic lesions discovered during culprit vessel coronary intervention. Circulation 2005; 111: 143-149.

30 Schwarz AK, Zahn R, Hochadel M, et al. Age-related differences in antithrombotic therapy, success rate and in- hospital mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: Results of the quality control registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausarzte (ALKK). Clin Res Cardiol 2011; 100: 773-780.

31 Gharacholou SM, Lopes RD, Alexander KP, et al. Age and outcomes in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention: findings from the APEX-AMI trial. Arch Intern Med 2011; 171: 559-567.

32 Nguyen HL, Goldberg RJ, Gore JM, et al. Age and sex differences, and changing trends, in the use of evidence-based therapies in acute coronary syndromes: perspectives from a multinational registry. Coron Artery Dis 2010; 21: 336-344.

33 Hlatky MA, Boothroyd DB, Bravata DM, et al. Coronary artery bypass surgery compared with percutaneous coronary interventions for multivessel disease: a collaborative analysis of individual patient data from ten randomised trials. Lancet 2009; 373: 1190-1197.

34 Liu M, Zhang P, Chen M, et al. Aging might increase myocardial ischemia/reperfusion-induced apoptosis in humans and rats. Age 2012; 34: 621-632.