doi:

DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1002.2008.00041

Journal of Systematics and Evolution 2008/46:1 PP.41-52

A hypothesis on cupule evolution and the evidence from molecular phylogenies and fossils


Abstract:
The cupule is the most distinguishable character of the Fagaceae and has been the focus of much research. Many hypotheses have been proposed for the origin, evolution and morphological features of the cupule. These were based on different types of evidence, but here we used molecular phylogenetic and fossil evidence. Our results supported the view that cupule valves originated from the outermost branches of the dichasium, and that cupules of the Fagaceae were distinct from other cupule-like organs with perianth origins in Fagales. There were three models of cupule evolution, each characterized by distinct evolutionary tendencies, single, dual and multi-directional respectively. Based on these models, we reconstructed the cupule's evolution using the consensus of four recent molecular phylogenies from different DNA fragments. Our results indicated that cupules had a monophyletic origin and that the Fagus cupule, with four cupule valves enclosing two triangular acorns, represented the ancestral type, the Trigonobalanus cupule was the inferior-ancestral type, and the Chrysolepis cupule which possesses inner valves, shared a common ancestor with other roundish cupules. Our conclusions are also unequivocally supported by fossil evidence, with affinity of extant homologous cupule. The consensus from four molecular phylogenetic hypotheses along with the age of fossil cupules that are similar to extant Fagaceae taxa indicate that the cupule evolved in multi-directions, and that the small triangular, narrow winged fruits surrounded by a dehiscent cupule was plesiomorphy, and that a bigger roundish fruit surrounded by an indehiscent cupule was apomorphy. All these results provide the new evidence to explore evolution and phylogeny of Fagaceae.

Key words:cupule, evolutionary hypotheses, Fagaceae, fossil, molecular phylogeny, origin.

ReleaseDate:2014-07-21 14:10:09



APG. 2003. http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/Research/Apweb.

Brett DW. 1964. The inflorescences of Fagus and Castanea, and the evolution of the cupules of the Fagaceae. New Phytologist 63: 96–118.

Cannon CH, Manos PS. 2003. Phylogeography of the Southeast Asian stone oaks (Lithocarpus). Journal of Biogeography 30: 211–226.

Celakovsky L. 1890. Ueber die Cupula von Fagus und Castanea. Jahrbücher für Wissenschaftliche Botanik 21: 128–162.

Chen Y-Q (陈亚琼). 2007. Phylogeny and Biogeography of Fagaceae (壳斗科的系统演化及生物地理). Ph.D. Dissertation. Kunming: Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences. 16–35.

Chiang T-Y, Hung K-H, Hsu T-W, Wu W-L. 2004. Lineage sorting and phylogeography in Lithocarpus formosanus and L. dodonaeifolius (Fagaceae) from Taiwan. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 91: 207–222.

Crepet WL, Nixon KC. 1989a. Earliest megafossil evidence of Fagaceae: phylogenetic and biogeographic implications. American Journal of Botany 76: 842–855.

Crepet WL, Nixon KC. 1989b. Extinct transitional Fagaceae from the Oligocene and their phylogenetic implications. American Journal of Botany 76: 1493–1505.

Fey BS, Endress PK. 1983. Development and morphological interpretation of the cupule in Fagaceae. Flora 173: 451–468.

Forman LL. 1966. On the evolution of cupules in the Fagaceae. Kew Bulletin 18: 385–419.

Herendeen PS, Crane PR, Drinnan AN. 1995. Fagaceous flowers, fruits, and cupules from the Campanian (Late Cretaceous) of central Georgia, USA. International Journal of Plant Sciences 156: 93–116.

Jenkins R. 1993. The origin of the Fagaceous cupule. Botanical Review 59: 81–111.

Kaul RB. 1985. Reproductive morphology of Quercus (Fagaceae). American Journal of Botany 72: 1962–1977.

Kaul RB. 1986. Evolution and reproductive biology of inflorescences in Lithocarpus, Castanopsis, Castanea, and Quercus (Fagaceae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 73: 284–296.

Kaul RB. 1988. Cupular structure in Paleotropical Castanopsis (Fagaceae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 75: 1480–1498.

Langdon LM. 1939. Ontogenetic and anatomical studies of the flower and fruit of the Fagaceae and Juglandaceae. Botanical Gazette 101: 301–327.

Li J, Bogle AL. 1995. Sequence analysis and phylogenetic reconstruction of rbcL gene in the subclass Hamamelididae. American Journal of Botany 82: 145.

Li RQ, Chen ZD, Lu AM, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Manos PS. 2004. Phylogenetic relationships in Fagales based on DNA sequences from three genomes. International Journal of Plant Sciences 165: 311–324.

MacDonald AD. 1979. Inception of the cupule in Quercus macrocarpa and Fagus grandiflora. Canadian Journal of Botany 57: 1777–1782.

Maddison WP, Maddison DR. 2006. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 1.12. http://mesquiteproject.org.

Manos PS, Nixon KC, Doyle JJ. 1993. Cladistic-analysis of restriction site variation within the chloroplast DNA inverted repeat region of selected Hamamelididae. Systematic Botany 18: 551–562.

Manos PS, Stanford AM. 2001. The historical biogeography of Fagaceae: Tracking the tertiary history of temperate and subtropical forests of the Northern Hemisphere. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162: S77–S93.

Manos PS, Steele KP. 1995. A phylogenetic analysis of “higher” Hamamelididae based on morphology and sequences from plastid and nuclear DNA. American Journal of Botany 82: 149.

Manos PS, Steele KP. 1996. A phylogenetic analysis of “higher” Hamamelididae based on sequences from nuclear ribosomal DNA. American Journal of Botany 83: 177.

Manos PS, Zhou ZK, Cannon CH. 2001. Systematics of Fagaceae: Phylogenetic tests of reproductive trait evolution. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162: 1361–1379.

Nixon KC, Crepet WL. 1989. Trigonobalanus (Fagaceae): Taxonomic status and phylogenetic relationships. American Journal of Botany 76: 828–841.

Okamoto M. 1989. New interpretation of the inflorescence of Fagus drawn from the developmental study of Fagus crenata, with description of an extremely monstrous cupule. American Journal of Botany 76: 14–22.

Rozefelds AC, Drinnan AN. 1997. Pistillate inflorescence architecture and morphology of the southern beeches (Nothofagus). American Journal of Botany 84: 54.

Rozefelds AC, Drinnan AN. 1998. Ontogeny and diversity in staminate flowers of Nothofagus (Nothofagaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 159: 906–922.

Sims HJ, Herendeen PS, Crane PR. 1998. New genus of fossil Fagaceae from the Santonian (Late Cretaceous) of central Georgia, USA. International Journal of Plant Sciences 159: 391–404.

Soepadmo E. 1968. A revision of the genus Quercus L. subgen. Cyclobalanopsis (Oersted) Schneider. Malesia Gard Bull Sing 22: 355–427.

Stanford AM, Parks CR, Harden R. 1997. Biogeography and phylogeny of Castanea, Fagus, and Juglans based on matK and ITS sequence data. American Journal of Botany 84: 234.

Takhtajan AL. 1997. Diversity and Classification of Flowering Plants. New York: Columbia University Press.

Thorne RF. 2000. The classification and geography of the flowering plants: Dicotyledons of the class Angiospermae. Botanical Reviews 66: 441–647.

van Steenis CGGJ. 1953. Results of the Archbold expeditions. Papuan Nothofagus. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 34: 301–374.

Zhou Z-K (周浙昆). 1999. Fossils of the Fagaceae and their implications in systematics and biogeography. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica (植物分类学报) 37: 369–385.

PDF