DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2014.00714
Acta Psychologica Sinica (心理学报) 2014/46:5 PP.714-726
Abstract：
Mediation and moderation models are frequently used in the research of psychology and many other social science disciplines. Mediation indicates that the effect of an independent variable on a dependent variable is transmitted through a third variable, namely a mediator. For example, students' gratitude promoted their academic achievement medially by increasing everyday academic resilience. Moderation occurs when the effect of an independent variable on a dependent variable varies according to the level of a third variable, which interacts with the independent variable. For instance, adolescents' perceptions of their teachers' authoritative teaching moderated the effect of antisocial disruption on peer acceptance.
It is not uncommon for hypotheses about moderation and mediation relationships to occur in the same context where more than three variables are involved. When a mediation effect is moderated by a moderator, the effect is termed moderated mediation and the model is moderated mediation model. For example, everyday academic resilience acts as a mediator between gratitude and academic achievement, and this mediation process is moderated by stressful life events.
There are several methods for testing moderated mediation models. The moderated mediation models being used for proposed testing methods are different. We are wondering whether different testing methods are competitors, or some of them are only backups.
We discussed the different testing methods based on the most general type of model. The traditional testing method is the moderated causal steps approach, in which the regression coefficients are tested in sequence. Modern methods include the testing of the products of coefficients by using Bootstrap method or MCMC method, and testing of the difference between the maximum and minimum of the mediation effects. On the basis of the previous studies it can be summarized that the power of test with the moderated causal steps approach is the lowest among the three testing methods, whereas the testing of the difference between the maximum and minimum of the mediation effects has the highest power of test.
After comparing significant results of the three testing methods by reviewing the simplification, implication, information, and explanation, we concluded that the moderated causal steps approach should be recommended first; testing of the products of coefficients by using Bootstrap method or MCMC method should be treated as a backup; testing of the difference between the maximum and minimum of the mediation effects should be the final choice.
We proposed a hierarchical procedure for testing moderated mediation models as follows:
Step 1. Adopt the moderated causal steps approach to test the model. If the significant result is obtained from the test, the mediating effect is moderated. Otherwise, go to Step 2.
Step 2. Test the products of coefficients by using Bootstrap method or MCMC method. If any product is significantly different from zero, the mediating effect is moderated. Otherwise, go to Step 3.
Step 3. Test the difference between the maximum and minimum of the mediation effects. If the difference is significant, the mediating effect is moderated. Otherwise, the mediating effect is not moderated.
As an illustration, the procedure was applied to an empirical study in which everyday academic resilience played the role of a mediator between gratitude and academic achievement, and this mediation process moderated by stressful life events.
The relationship and difference between moderated mediation models and mediated moderation models were also discussed.
ReleaseDate：2016-12-20 17:21:50
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and medation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12, 1-22.
Ellis, P. D. (2010). The essential guide to effect sizes: Statistical power, meta-analysis, and the interpretation of research results. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Fang, J., & Zhang, M. Q. (2010).Assessing point and interval estimation for the mediating effect: Distribution of the product, nonparametric bootstrap and Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. Acta Psychologica Sinica,44, 1408-1420.
[方杰, 张敏强. (2012). 中介效应的点估计和区间估计: 乘积分布法、非参数Bootstrap和MCMC法. 心理学报, 44, 1408-1420.]
Fritz, M. S., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2007). Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychological Science, 18, 233-239.
Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76, 408-420.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). An introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.
Liu, D., Zhang, Z., & Wang, M. (2012).Moderated mediation and mediated moderation: Theory construction and model checking (Gao, Z. H Trans.). In P. X. Cheng, Y. S. Xu, & L. J. Fan (Eds.), Empirical methods in organization and management research (2nd ed, pp. 553-587). Beijing: Peking University Press.
[刘东, 张震, 汪默. (2012). 被调节的中介和被中介的调节: 理论构建与模型检验(高中华译). 见: 陈晓萍, 徐淑英, 樊景立 (编). 组织与管理研究的实证方法(第二版, pp. 553-587). 北京: 北京大学出版社.]
MacKinnon, D. P. (2008).Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Earlbaum.
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. A. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects.Psychological Methods, 7, 83-104.
MacKinnon, D. P., Warsi, G., & Dwyer, J. H. (1995). A simulation study of mediated effect measures.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 41-62.
Muller, D., Judd, C. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 852-863.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004).SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,36, 717-731.
Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185-227.
Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence interval for indirect effects in structural equation models.In S. Leinhardt.(Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290-312). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
Wen, Z., Chang, L, & Hau, K. T. (2006). Mediated moderator and moderated mediator. Acta Psychologica Sinica,38, 448-452.
[温忠麟, 张雷, 侯杰泰. (2006). 有中介的调节变量和有调节的中介变量. 心理学报, 38, 448-452.]
Wen, Z., Chang, L, Hau, K. T., & Liu, H. (2004). Testing and application of the mediating effects. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 36, 614-620.
[温忠麟, 张雷, 侯杰泰, 刘红云. (2004). 中介效应检验程序及其应用. 心理学报, 36, 614-620.]
Wen, Z., Hau, K. T., & Chang, L. (2005). A comparison of moderator and mediator and their applications. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 37, 268-274.
[温忠麟, 侯杰泰, 张雷. (2005). 调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用. 心理学报, 37, 268-274.]
Wen, Z., Liu, H., & Hau, K. T. (2012). Analyses of moderating and mediating effects. Beijing: Educational Science Publishing House.
[温忠麟, 刘红云, 侯杰泰. (2012). 调节效应和中介效应分析. 北京: 教育科学出版社.]
Ye, B., & Wen, Z. (2013). A discussion on testing methods for mediated moderation models: Discrimination and integration. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 45, 1050-1060.
[叶宝娟, 温忠麟. (2013). 有中介的调节模型检验方法: 甄别和整合. 心理学报,45, 1050-1060.]
Ye, B., Yang, Q., & Hu, Z. (2012). The effect mechanism of parental control, deviant peers and sensation seeking on drug Use among reform school students. Psychological Development and Education, 28, 641-650.
[叶宝娟, 杨强, 胡竹菁. (2012). 父母控制、不良同伴和感觉寻求对工读生毒品使用的影响机制, 心理发展与教育, 28, 641-650.]
Ye, B., Yang, Q., & Hu, Z. (2013). Effect of gratitude on adolescents' academic achievement: Moderated mediating effect.Psychological Development and Education, 29, 192-199.
[叶宝娟, 杨强, 胡竹菁. (2013).感恩对青少年学业成就的影响: 有调节的中介效应, 心理发展与教育, 29, 192-199.]
Yuan, Y., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2009). Bayesian mediation analysis. Psychological Methods, 14, 301-322.